International When Grifters Wilfully Misunderstand Basic Censorship: Musk Edition

Siver!

Mystic Siver!
Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2024
Messages
7,768
Reaction score
20,242

Elon Musk has said that critics of his social media site X are looking for "any excuse for censorship", amid reports that X's artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot Grok was creating non-consensual sexualised images of people, including children.
Ofcom says it is conducting an urgent assessment of X in response, which has been backed by Technology Secretary Liz Kendall.
She described the sexual manipulation of images of women and children as "despicable and abhorrent", adding that she would expect to see an update from Ofcom in "days".
X has now limited the use of AI image function to those who pay a monthly fee, a change dubbed by Downing Street as "insulting" to victims of sexual violence.
The BBC has seen several examples of the free AI tool undressing women and putting them in sexual situations without their consent.
Ashley St Clair, the mother of one of Elon Musk's children, told BBC Newshour that Grok had generated sexualised photos of her as a child.
The conservative influencer said her image had been "stripped" to appear "basically nude, bent over", despite her telling Grok that she did not consent to the sexualised images.
St Clair, who filed a lawsuit against Musk last year seeking sole custody of their child, accused the social media site of "not taking enough action" to tackle illegal content, including child sexual abuse imagery. "This could be stopped with a singular message to an engineer," she said.
As of Friday morning, Grok was telling users asking it to alter images uploaded to X that "image generation and editing are currently limited to paying subscribers", adding users "can subscribe to unlock these features".
An Ofcom spokesperson said: "We urgently made contact [with X] on Monday and set a firm deadline of today [Friday] to explain themselves, to which we have received a response."
"We're now undertaking an expedited assessment as a matter of urgency and will provide further updates shortly."
Ofcom's powers under the Online Safety Act include being able to seek a court order to prevent third parties from helping X raise money or be accessed in the UK - should the firm refuse to comply.
Kendall has said that Ofcom will have the government's full support if it makes the decision to block X in the UK.

The use of Grok to generate non-consensual sexualised images has been condemned by politicians on all sides:
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer calling it "disgraceful" and "disgusting"
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said it was "horrible in every way" and that X "needs to go further" than the changes it had made to Grok on Friday, but he added that banning the platform would be an attack on free speech
The Liberal Democrats called for access to X to be temporarily restricted in the UK while the social media site was investigated.

---

Digitally manipulating pictures of girls and children for sexual gratification...

Yeah, Elon, child pornography isn't kosher anywhere in the world, you useless turd.

Imagine him defending this in the name of "being against censorship".

Creeps gonna creep.
 
Wouldn't be difficult to create a watch list for people asking AI to generate these images.

Personally im pretty anti Grok, seems like the darkest version of what large scale AI can be.
 
I'll take that as long as you're not American but if you are American maybe sort the Epstein files out.
Those files won't be out for decades if ever.
I don't know the programming well enough for from to cover it but couldnt a person just do this with ms paint or Photoshop. It's a program.
I don't know this is out of my realm. If you reprogrammed grok you'd have to hit ms paint, photo shop everything that can drawl.
I don't know im an actual conservative not a regressive (republican) or a liberal I tend to err on the side of liberty. I'm probably missing something.
 
Lol at the left talking about anyone deliberately misunderstanding anything. Its been your entire gameplan for the past 15 years.

Just making sure you're aware you're in a thread where the issue is censoring making AI altered pornographic images of real women and children so you're absolutely sure which side you want to take.
 
Those files won't be out for decades if ever.
I don't know the programming well enough for from to cover it but couldnt a person just do this with ms paint or Photoshop. It's a program.
I don't know this is out of my realm. If you reprogrammed grok you'd have to hit ms paint, photo shop everything that can drawl.
I don't know im an actual conservative not a regressive (republican) or a liberal I tend to err on the side of liberty. I'm probably missing something.

Wouldn't making AI porn of kids on Photoshop require obtaining actual naked images of children to use to make the edits with?
 
Wouldn't making AI porn of kids on Photoshop require obtaining actual naked images of children to use to make the edits with?
Not really. Grok could use art, sculptures, pre-existing semi nudes etc. if I was programming it to to make naked women I wouldn't need nude photos, I'd feed it art. Trumps a PDF and sob, im just adding that on so you get my feeling about him.
 
Not really. Grok could use art, sculptures, pre-existing semi nudes etc. if I was programming it to to make naked women I wouldn't need nude photos, I'd feed it art. Trumps a PDF and sob, im just adding that on so you get my feeling about him.

Grok can do it without you needing anything. I'm asking about Photoshop because people are talking as if it's the same thing when I don't think it is.
 
not defending grok, but i prefer creeps get their rocks off to AI rather than real photos
 
Just making sure you're aware you're in a thread where the issue is censoring making AI altered pornographic images of real women and children so you're absolutely sure which side you want to take.
Just making sure you know this is a thread about international use of ai images, since you brought up America and Epstein
 
Back
Top