- Joined
- Apr 29, 2018
- Messages
- 12,719
- Reaction score
- 16,557
In this past event Bellator 198 Fedor vs Mir we saw Bellator implement a formula that Scott Coker has mentioned before:
The idea of putting on a strong main event fight with two marquee names and then filling up the rest of the card with young talented prospects who will benefit from the attention drawn by the main event. This is different formula from a typical ufc ppv which looks to put on a marquee name main and co main event, and then fill up the rest of the card with filler matches that sometimes have divisional relevance and sometimes doesn’t.
In your opinion (and hopefully Bellator has people who pay attention to the opinions on these forums and take it into account)...What is the best formula for success when creating a Bellator card? Regardless of costs, if you were Rich Chou matchmaker of Bellator - how would the upcoming Fedor vs. Sonnen card look like?
My main card formula would look like this:
Main event
Fedor vs Sonnen (hw gran prix seminfinal match)
Freak show/old timers’ fight
Royce Gracie vs ken shamrock rematch
Or
Chuck Liddell vs Tito Ortiz
2 Bellator vs ufc filler bouts
(The Bellator vs ufc rivalry/narrative is a great idea to push in order to show that Bellator is no longer the Bush leagues and to determine the difference between organizational talent so mma fans can have a clear picture of where the best talent really lies)
In other words put on a lesser known but established Bellator name vs a former ufc fighter. Rory McDonald vs Douglas Lima is an example of this. Make it the new pride vs ufc of now.
Prospect growing Opening bout (prospect Dillon Danis or Aaron pico vs “x fighter that is the next step up in competition”)
Whether economically feasible or not I believe this is the correct formula for Bellator to rise up and become the clear tie for number one org. instead of a distant second place. If they follow this formula every single card while reducing overall cards to once a month/month and a half or so, they will prosper and grow the brand. Create artificial demand through lack of supply and consistent quality.
The idea of putting on a strong main event fight with two marquee names and then filling up the rest of the card with young talented prospects who will benefit from the attention drawn by the main event. This is different formula from a typical ufc ppv which looks to put on a marquee name main and co main event, and then fill up the rest of the card with filler matches that sometimes have divisional relevance and sometimes doesn’t.
In your opinion (and hopefully Bellator has people who pay attention to the opinions on these forums and take it into account)...What is the best formula for success when creating a Bellator card? Regardless of costs, if you were Rich Chou matchmaker of Bellator - how would the upcoming Fedor vs. Sonnen card look like?
My main card formula would look like this:
Main event
Fedor vs Sonnen (hw gran prix seminfinal match)
Freak show/old timers’ fight
Royce Gracie vs ken shamrock rematch
Or
Chuck Liddell vs Tito Ortiz
2 Bellator vs ufc filler bouts
(The Bellator vs ufc rivalry/narrative is a great idea to push in order to show that Bellator is no longer the Bush leagues and to determine the difference between organizational talent so mma fans can have a clear picture of where the best talent really lies)
In other words put on a lesser known but established Bellator name vs a former ufc fighter. Rory McDonald vs Douglas Lima is an example of this. Make it the new pride vs ufc of now.
Prospect growing Opening bout (prospect Dillon Danis or Aaron pico vs “x fighter that is the next step up in competition”)
Whether economically feasible or not I believe this is the correct formula for Bellator to rise up and become the clear tie for number one org. instead of a distant second place. If they follow this formula every single card while reducing overall cards to once a month/month and a half or so, they will prosper and grow the brand. Create artificial demand through lack of supply and consistent quality.
Last edited: