What is a UFC "Robbery" where you think the judges were actually right.

[DoctorStoppage]

Aldo-Moraes. Moraes pretty clearly won 2-1

 

[HereticBD]

GSP/Hendricks

 

[Andy Capp]

What is a robbery that you think either wasn't a robbery or was closer than people think.

I'm gonna go first with GSP vs Hendricks. That fight was actually extremely close when you look at the score cards and it literally could have went either way. I feel people think it was a robbery more do to the fact that Hendricks was his hardest fight and won his rounds more convincingly.
http://ufcstats.com/fight-details/7ff036c99621eb1c

GSP won 3 and 5 convincingly and Hendricks won 2 and 4 pretty convincingly (although 2 was very close but I gave it to Hendricks because he wobbled Georges)
It only came down to the first round where the stats were almost exactly even except GSP had a submission attempt so I honestly would either give the round to GSP or make it a Draw.

Name some fights you think were not really a robbery but others do.

Opened the thread because of the title to post exactly what you did, funny enough.

That's the only one that comes to mind for me and I would have been fine with a draw also. So, not much to add, I'm afraid.