What is a globalist?

[Blackened]

Power and wealth concentrate and it's true that the majority of those interested in extreme accumulation tend to be of a certain personality type; a type that would pursue gain at the expense of the greater good, usually with no existential perspective. However, I find it difficult to believe those types of personalities are capable of forming oligarchies concentrated on a collective goal. History is rife with example of how those types of personalities react to others when they have great power and wealth: typically with paranoia, seclusion and an overriding urge to exert primacy.

Right, sociopaths working together would be a nightmare.

I remember asking my psych professor about how two people of this personality type would respond in a relationship and he laughed saying he really doubts they would get passed the 'hello' before it crumbled (obvious hyperbole).

 

[JaPo]

I may do that at some point. Problem is it requires a lot of time to go through all the works and evidence. It's an entire body of knowledge.

any single piece of the puzzle can fit with a number of possible explanations. Only when the pieces come together it is proof.

It's a classic problem of how to present a complex picture. That's why people write books or create documentaries. There are countless of those already in circulation.

So, we are left to discuss which I like doing.

We can see the consolidation of power happening, we can see the wealth disparity, we can see the global institutions, we can see the creation of a trading block in the EU, we can see the mass immigration policies, we can see the private banks creating money, we can see China rising as a result of trade policies, we can see the economic interdependencies increasing, etc etc.

the globalists are up there making it all happen.

Most people would rather talk about someone saying something racist though

It's because you don't actually have enough faith in your intelligence or the strength of the evidence to do credit to this crackpot 'puzzle' you've apparently based so much of your life around. It's easier for you to make vague, rambling, irrelevant posts in pretty much every single thread on this forum, hoping through their repetition and ubiquity that someday you will fool people into believing you. No-one does though. You aren't the only one who 'gets it'. You're not better attuned to the workings of the world than the next man, nor any better equipped to 'cross-reference' and sift through information.

 

[cabal]

Just like the devil, globalist elite don't like people talks about them

 

[panamaican]

Well let's see. IF there was such a network, what sort of evidence would you be interested in? Honest question, because it's a puzzle I wonder about sometimes.

I know what it is like being on the other side and the only reason I know about it was because I didn't really buy the main stream explanations for what is happening in the world, and was curious about it.

Evidence would be a specific act (even if it failed) tied to specific people. Not conferences or parties or anything irrelevant like that. All acts of strategized globalism.

You may not like mainstream explanations but just because there's an alternative theory doesn't make that theory the truth.

 

[IDL]

Evidence would be a specific act (even if it failed) tied to specific people. Not conferences or parties or anything irrelevant like that. All acts of strategized globalism.

You may not like mainstream explanations but just because there's an alternative theory doesn't make that theory the truth.

The creation of the Federal Reserve is a good one. Many books about how that all came about. I'll see if I can show something in a small amount of space.

Completely agree about alternative explainations.

 

[IDL]

It's because you don't actually have enough faith in your intelligence or the strength of the evidence to do credit to this crackpot 'puzzle' you've apparently based so much of your life around. It's easier for you to make vague, rambling, irrelevant posts in pretty much every single thread on this forum, hoping through their repetition and ubiquity that someday you will fool people into believing you. No-one does though. You aren't the only one who 'gets it'. You're not better attuned to the workings of the world than the next man, nor any better equipped to 'cross-reference' and sift through information.

I'm not saying I'm better at anything, it's just a different body of knowledge that most people don't enter into, that's all.

It contradicts a lot of what people think about how the world works, so it's uncomfortable territory for most.

 

[afrdzak]

The creation of the Federal Reserve is a good one. Many books about how that all came about. I'll see if I can show something in a small amount of space.

Completely agree about alternative explainations.

What role do you think the US Federal Reserve plays regarding the global economy?

 

[IDL]

What role do you think the US Federal Reserve plays regarding the global economy?

It's part of a much larger network, but since the US is the most influential country and economy and power over the money supply awards a great deal of influence over it I'd say it is a very powerful entity in terms of global influence.

I noted earlier that Paul Warburg, one of the founders, also was one of the founders of the CFR. This is just one of many suggestions that there are ties between banking and politics. There are many resources and books examining these relationships.

Most people assume politics trumps bankers, but I have found that it is the other way around.

So, they can game the system, influence politicians to set various policies, move large amounts of money around, collect interest from Taxpayers work, etc. They can work with fellow friends in the network to coordinate the markets and whatnot. It's a license to print money and buy more and more power.

There is a private central bank in almost every country on earth that is part of the same network.

 

[afrdzak]

It's part of a much larger network, but since the US is the most influential country and economy and power over the money supply awards a great deal of influence over it I'd say it is a very powerful entity in terms of global influence.

I noted earlier that Paul Warburg, one of the founders, also was one of the founders of the CFR. This is just one of many suggestions that there are ties between banking and politics. There are many resources and books examining these relationships.

Most people assume politics trumps bankers, but I have found that it is the other way around.

Thanks.
I have always wondered about the US dollar and the part it plays globally....and what role the Fed plays in keeping it propped up.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Thanks.
I have always wondered about the US dollar and the part it plays globally....and what role the Fed plays in keeping it propped up.

Yeah, it was nice of IDL to clear that up for everyone.

 

[IDL]

Thanks.
I have always wondered about the US dollar and the part it plays globally....and what role the Fed plays in keeping it propped up.

the US dollar is extremely important globally since it is being used as the primary international trading currency.

There are trillions of USD outside of the US and many nations rely on it for trade (including oil). This adds to the leverage of the people who control it, which in turn affects global politics.

I think it is propped up by peoples reliance on it, and the faith that people have for it. They are just paper notes, after all. No real value. Or, bytes on a computer these days..

In order to keep it propped up, people need to keep using it for trade. So if some leader somewhere wanted to stop using the dollar and instead trade oil in something else, you can count on some very powerful people taking notice..

 

[Heefer Madness]

It's part of a much larger network, but since the US is the most influential country and economy and power over the money supply awards a great deal of influence over it I'd say it is a very powerful entity in terms of global influence.

I noted earlier that Paul Warburg, one of the founders, also was one of the founders of the CFR. This is just one of many suggestions that there are ties between banking and politics. There are many resources and books examining these relationships.

Most people assume politics trumps bankers, but I have found that it is the other way around.

Of course there are "ties between banking and politics", not a single person in the world denies that. It doesn't mean there's a centralized plan and agreement between all these sociopaths to "global domination" or whatever. The world is much more complicated than this. Coordination and consensus are extremely difficult to attain and maintain, especially when it comes to mischievous crooks like the ones you describe. Just think about the logistics and the amount of people that would need to be involved for such a plan to work.

 

[afrdzak]

the US dollar is extremely important globally since it is being used as the primary international trading currency.

There are trillions of USD outside of the US and many nations rely on it for trade (including oil). This adds to the leverage of the people who control it, which in turn affects global politics.

I think it is propped up by peoples reliance on it, and the faith that people have for it. They are just paper notes, after all. No real value.

In order to keep it propped up, people need to keep using it for trade. So if some leader somewhere wanted to stop using the dollar and instead trade oil in something else, you can count on some very powerful people taking notice..

Why the dollar? As opposed to the Yuan? Or even Bitcoin as Sir Richard Branson has suggested.

 

[IDL]

Of course there are "ties between banking and politics", not a single person in the world denies that. It doesn't mean there's a centralized plan and agreement between all these sociopaths to "global domination" or whatever. The world is much more complicated than this. Coordination and consensus are extremely difficult to attain and maintain, especially when it comes to mischievous crooks like the ones you describe. Just think about the logistics and the amount of people that would need to be involved for such a plan to work.

Certainly it seems difficult to think that they could be that coordinated, since they are human after all. I was as skeptical as anyone else.

There are many layers to how this system is run and how it came about. The top players are not like you and me they are born into it and are in that sort of environment all the time. The ones that weren't are accepted based on certain criteria (loyalty being one of them). So applying common assumptions doesn't always apply to the operation of such a high up system.

The best analogy for how to visualize it is a sort of cross between a military and a mafia.

Military command structure can include in theory, an infinite number of people. Do they all get along? Probably not. But they listen to hierarchy and direction from above and if they don't they will be reprimanded. There is also a sense of loyalty to the group which is instilled. Same with the mafia and how they are part of the family, or brotherhood. At the top there is much more to it, but in general it applies.

That and most people within the system only know what they need to know based on position and hierarchy. People with jobs..

It IS very complicated, but it is also very explainable and well understood by a lot of researchers.

 

[Shartnado]

Globalist want a one world power with a one world currency.

Hence the Trans Pacific Partnership agreement

 

[IDL]

Why the dollar? As opposed to the Yuan? Or even Bitcoin as Sir Richard Branson has suggested.

The dollar is sort of an extension of the US empire and it makes sense that it would be the one chosen due to the power of the US at the time.

Some of it is described here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system

As for current day, I think the biggest reason is because it is entrenched in the system and the powers behind it want to keep it that way at least for the short term. There are moves being made by other countries, and some political rhetoric to match, that indicate the desire to get away from it. If that happens, it will have big repercussions to the global financial system and the USD.

And if that does happen, it will have been planned that way by the global banking network

 

[afrdzak]

The dollar is sort of an extension of the US empire and it makes sense that it would be the one chosen due to the power of the US at the time.

Some of it is described here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system

As for current day, I think the biggest reason is because it is entrenched in the system and the powers behind it want to keep it that way at least for the short term. There are moves being made by other countries, and some political rhetoric to match, that indicate the desire to get away from it. If that happens, it will have big repercussions to the global financial system and the USD.

And if that does happen, it will have been planned that way by the global banking network

Does the Global Banking Network profit or otherwise gain from disparate world currencies (on the exchange market or currency fixing) or would they prefer one, singular currency?

 

[IDL]

Does the Global Banking Network profit or otherwise gain from disparate world currencies (on the exchange market or currency fixing) or would they prefer one, singular currency?

I would say both are true.

In the end, they want a centrally managed global currency but they also can make money from fluctuations which they can rig (see LIBOR)

It's more about power than it is about money.

 

[Jack V Savage]

the US dollar is extremely important globally since it is being used as the primary international trading currency.

There are trillions of USD outside of the US and many nations rely on it for trade (including oil). This adds to the leverage of the people who control it, which in turn affects global politics.

This is not even even close to being true. In the whole world *including the U.S.* all physical cash adds up to a little less than $2T. Also, what "leverage" do "the people who control it" (who?) have, and how are they using it?

 

[panamaican]

It's part of a much larger network, but since the US is the most influential country and economy and power over the money supply awards a great deal of influence over it I'd say it is a very powerful entity in terms of global influence.

I noted earlier that Paul Warburg, one of the founders, also was one of the founders of the CFR. This is just one of many suggestions that there are ties between banking and politics. There are many resources and books examining these relationships.

Most people assume politics trumps bankers, but I have found that it is the other way around.

So, they can game the system, influence politicians to set various policies, move large amounts of money around, collect interest from Taxpayers work, etc. They can work with fellow friends in the network to coordinate the markets and whatnot. It's a license to print money and buy more and more power.

There is a private central bank in almost every country on earth that is part of the same network.

That's hardly what I'm asking for. I don't need evidence of ties between banking and politics or any other industry and politics. I need evidence of a cabal and that the cabal has a specific agenda, followed by an example of something the cabal attempted to do, including how we know it was the cabal and not some other force at work.

That's all I'm looking for.