What do you prefer...

[Wrath of Foamy]

There is a lot more raw talent nowadays then there was in the past brand split, but there is another reason why I would do a split if I was in charge and that is simply size and style.

NXT is without a doubt the best show WWE has going for it, but I would like Smackdown to be live and to take its place.

I'd also like Smackdown to be a home for the talented, but who do not really fit the mold of superstar. So really, to get an idea I'll list a few names for each show off the back of my head...

Raw: John Cena, HHH, Big Show, Brock Lesnar, Roman Reigns, Sheamus, Alberto Del Rio, Ryback, Nikki Bella, Alicia Fox, Summer Rae and the rest of the Total Diva cast.
Smackdown: Cesaro, AJ Styles, Seth Rollins, Kevin Owens, Wade Barrett, Rusev, Hideo Itami, Finn Balor, Baron Corbin, Asuka, Bayley and non Total Diva wrestlers.

Only one world title, fought once a month on PPV.

There is a lot of great talent, but wrestling is storytelling and stories have to be realistic (hence why Tyler Breeze is doing poorly on the main roster). My idea of a draft would reduce that by keeping the older way of WWE thinking and the newer, Indy style of thinking separate.

 

[D.R.H.]

I'd prefer a hard brand split if they could commit to making both shows equal.

 

[GearSolidMetal]

The amount of quality talent on the roster isn't even close to the level needed to make an argument for another brand split.

And the brand split felt extrememly manufacturered, like it was supposed to replicate the WCW/WWE feud within the company. Came off like a complete joke.