War Room Lounge v98: “Yes I’m a gangster and I committed that crime.”

[MVelsor]

buts thats why it works so well as the de facto insult.

you can plainly see that grown straight males are completely insecure in all facets and fucked up as often as anyone else. they're already failing at all their other "manly" standards, so it's the perfect extra needle point out that everyone can see it too.

Yeah, perhaps. On another note, I'm far less inclined to pile on the "classic case" of the outwardly homophobic dude who turns out to be gay. It seems like that insinuation is made by well-meaning leftists and liberals pretty regularly and always feels like an uncomfortable copout.

Most hateful people are just straight up cuntbags; reality is distorted by the fact that the aforementioned cases are 'newsworthy' in just about every instance. There are reasons men are closeted, "self-loathing" and/or lash out at and hurt other gay people. That doesn't just come from nowhere.

 

[Andy Capp]

As an add-on:

When there is a human history of countless century after century after century of stigma, repression and criminalization (which continues today in several dozens of countries), that isn't the gheys making it an issue. When you oppose or actively fight against civil/equal rights and talk about the "destruction of culture and civilization", that isn't the gheys making it an issue. When people's family and friends become estranged and break off from them on the sole account of that apparently meaningless characteristic (as in my case actually), that isn't the gheys making it an issue.

It's you, hetero folks. It always has been.

Well said; now, will I be told over and over that I hate straight people?

It's funny to me how some of the idiots around here take defense of racial equality movements as hating white people. Same reasoning. To people like that, being equal with them means they lose something and be damned if they're going to lose anything. But they will never admit that something is a system to disadvantage people who are not them.

 

[MVelsor]

Well said; now, will I be told over and over that I hate straight people?

It's funny to me how some of the idiots around here take defense of racial equality movements as hating white people. Same reasoning. To people like that, being equal with them means they lose something and be damned if they're going to lose anything. But they will never admit that something is a system to disadvantage people who are not them.

Indeed. For some reason, even full bore state-sponsored repression and criminalization has never been the intended impediment to success for us historically as I pointed out in the half-serious, dick-in-cheek posts below. I don't think I could objectively put it on the same level as more visible minorities such as racial and ethnic groups just for the simple fact the majority of us can 'straight-pass' with insane ease.

You had to essentially live an inauthentic, concealed miserable double life full of secrecy and god help damn you if caught out but it was -probably- at least somewhat manageable. OTOH, it is the perpetual global minority regardless of racial, ethnic or religious demographics and their shifts. All the right-wing white folks on here freaking out about "being a minority". What the fuck else is new, bruh?

The most productive members of society IMO. And who else could have conquered the Achaemenid Empire, given western civilization the High Renaissance or laid the philosophical underpinnings of the Scientific Revolution? Alan Turing (PBUH) died so people could bash teh gheys on computing devices.

* Vanderbilt economists linked self-reported sexual orientation with earnings for employed US adults in the 2013-15 National Health Interview Surveys. They found that gay men made, on average, 10% more than similarly employed straight men. The difference in pay persisted even when they controlled for a variety of factors.

* In 2016, the U.S. Treasury department revealed that same-sex male couples have an average household income of $176,000 - roughly $63,000 more than opposite-sex couples - confirming that there is some truth to the age-old myth that gays, particularly white cisgender men, have disposable income.

* Same-sex married men with children have average earnings of $275,000, more than double that of heterosexual and same-sex female couples. The combined buying power (DPI) of the U.S. lesbian, gay, and bisexual adult population was estimated at $987 billion in a 2017 projection by Witeck Communications.

This is very much a cultural thing with some tangible history, athough it even precedes those post-war fitness and physique photography magazines. Walt Whitman (Murica's national bard) was penning articles on giving the country "a more noble physique" under a pseudonym in the 1850s:

* Amazing but true: Boston researchers determined that gay women were more than twice as likely as straight women to be obese, while gay men were 50 percent less likely to be obese compared to their heterosexual counterparts, according to a report published in the American Journal of Public Health.

It's not that big of a deal.

* New research from the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law finds that an estimated 114,000 same-sex couples in the United States are raising children. According to the study, over 68% of same-sex couples who are raising children have biological children.

WeHo or Palm Springs (the entire city council is LGB) probably a better option for that. There's too many trannies in Frisco and something like 88% of cis homos aren't interested in fucking or dating them. Another problem with all this civil rights stuff in recent years is that a bunch of straight people have been moving into gayborhoods all over the country and exclusive spaces have gradually been disappearing.

Lesbianist, there was a single paragraph insta-burial ITT before an argument could even be started. That's already an outsized, disproportionate impact on civilization and culture -- on account of a mere five cocksuckers or so. GTFO. Granting gays equality is like a fucking handicap for straight people.

 

[Andy Capp]

I think this is worth a read/listen,
This obesity expert says we have far less control over our weight than we think
"For most people, losing weight is a losing battle. The mantra of "eat less and exercise more" does not seem to work.

That is because it is a simplistic formula that does not take into account many other factors that affect our body weight and our health, according to Jennifer Kuk. She is a professor in the department of kinesiology and health science at York University..."

Her reasoning is intended to explain the empirical finding that older people apparently have an easier time losing significant amounts of weight than people under 40. I didn't agree with everything she said but I can certainly agree that diet alone isn't sufficient to explain the current obesity problem.

I chuckled at the irony of her complaint about a simplistic formula when she then tries very hard to defend the use of the ever so simplistic BMI to make determinations regarding obesity. But overall, she presented a clear and thorough argument that if a person is fat it doesn't necessarily mean they're an irresponsible eater, i.e. it just might not be their fault they're fat. This is in line with a study I recall seeing a long while back that showed that a fit fat person is healthier and lives longer than an unfit thin person, generally.

Just throwing it out there for a Sunday brain snack.

 

[Andy Capp]

Yeah, perhaps. On another note, I'm far less inclined to pile on the "classic case" of the outwardly homophobic dude who turns out to be gay. It seems like that insinuation is made by well-meaning leftists and liberals pretty regularly and always feels like an uncomfortable copout.

Most hateful people are just straight up cuntbags; reality is distorted by the fact that the aforementioned cases are 'newsworthy' in just about every instance. There are reasons men are closeted, "self-loathing" and/or lash out at and hurt other gay people. That doesn't just come from nowhere.

This helps explain how commonly it appears to occur in the right wing of the American Congress, IMO. By being an outlier you stand out and that gets you elected.

 

[nac386]

The hilarious thing is that I would never have to be the one to bring it up. This forum is utterly incapable of keeping the gay out of its dirty mouth for even a single period of 24 hours. I've actually made a note to never do so for the entire year, and it's absolutely guaranteed that I won't have to. It's kind of embarrassing to juxtapose with the inverse, and I'm talking about spaces of up to 200,000+ (cis) homos. <Lmaoo>

Everything you’re saying in this thread also applies to race. The racism here is casual and pervasive, I’d even argue it’s more common than the homophobia.

 

[Andy Capp]

Everything you’re saying in this thread also applies to race. The racism here is casual and pervasive, I’d even argue it’s more common than the homophobia.

Certainly, I agree it likely has more potential for harm, but casual and pervasive applies to both equally, I think.

 

[nostradumbass]

@nostradumbass what sport did you play pro, bulleh? My guess is tennis, just based on your build and how long your career was.

Yeah, was tennis.

 

[MVelsor]

This helps explain how commonly it appears to occur in the right wing of the American Congress, IMO. By being an outlier you stand out and that gets you elected.

That's definitely taking it to a more egregious level and generally worthy of a lot more scorn, for obvious reasons. But yeah...

 

[dissectingaorticaneurysm]

Well said; now, will I be told over and over that I hate straight people?

It's funny to me how some of the idiots around here take defense of racial equality movements as hating white people. Same reasoning. To people like that, being equal with them means they lose something and be damned if they're going to lose anything. But they will never admit that something is a system to disadvantage people who are not them.

These guys suddenly become the protagonists of an Ayn Rand novel at the first sign of resistance because they have been so accustomed to coasting through life. Maybe you've gotta go through a few more job interviews than you're used to but believe me- that privilege is still intact.

 

[Gutter Chris]

~ The Ultimate Insult ~



@Merlotte's I don't actually know why bush disappeared and hasn't returned, but it's kind of insane I never once reported him (nor anyone else, ever) given the level of persistent harassment across multiple subforums on here. I never once attempted to initiate a conversation with this dude. It reads hilarious in hindsight, but was actually kind of disturbing in real time. There's a lot more than this that was deleted by mods with him talking about my son and other things.

Chinese admiral threatens to sink 2 US carriers over South China Sea claims


10-Year-Old Boy 'Drag Kid' Photographed With Naked Adult Drag Queen




I traded booze for berries today....with a drunk native. Am I a bad person???

Alpha or weak? Young billionaire, Evan Spiegel marries older model, waits for marriage for xxx

Birmingham school stops LGBT lessons after Muslim parents protest

Transgender wrestler Mack Beggs wins Texas girls title again


Beto In Deep Doodoo For Comparing Trump To Third Reich


Poor Cher isn't taking well to that red pill someone slipped into her Ensure


Pope donates half a mil to the illegal caravan


It is still ok to rape your wife in the U.S.

I remember. I tried to talk to the guy and tell him he was makin shit weird. I think you really freaked that dude out

 

[MVelsor]

Everything you’re saying in this thread also applies to race. The racism here is casual and pervasive, I’d even argue it’s more common than the homophobia.

Yeah, I know you think I'm a catty little who cries about homophobia while disregarding other forms of blatant discrimination. The former could honestly keep me entirely occupied if it was all I wanted to talk about. Are LGB people more tolerable than Blacks, Hispanics or Muslims? Maybe, although there's some evidence to the contrary. I seriously doubt posts like these (a retread subject) win me any points though. I'm also done talking about human genetic variation on this forum, period. The slightest misinterpretation of what I'm putting across just isn't worth the trouble.

 

[tonni]

 

[Deleted member 539235]

sudafed's a helluva drug

 

[dissectingaorticaneurysm]

The irony of a man having sex with a man is ironic on a genetic level ffs. It can't not be funny on some level to some people.

Nah, that's culturally learned. Not the sexual preference itself but finding humor in certain pairings.

Another interesting anecdote from a schoolteacher friend of mine- kids don't call each other gay slurs anymore, at least at her upper-middle class school. They've replaced it with "cuck" and "incel" (this was several years ago so they've probably moved onto new terms), but would be mortified to hear f-g on the playground. They would be ostracized for blurting it out.

 

[Fawlty]

Nah, that's culturally learned. Not the sexual preference itself but finding humor in certain pairings.

Another interesting anecdote from a schoolteacher friend of mine- kids don't call each other gay slurs anymore, at least at her upper-middle class school. They've replaced it with "cuck" and "incel" (this was several years ago so they've probably moved onto new terms), but would be mortified to hear f-g on the playground. They would be ostracized for blurting it out.

Sorry, but there is just no way that my desire to procreate and the resulting cognitive dissonance resulting from the idea of non-procreative sex is a social construct. Like fucking an apple pie, in a sense.

It's good that the slurs are going away in any case.

 

[MVelsor]

Nah, that's culturally learned. Not the sexual preference itself but finding humor in certain pairings.

Another interesting anecdote from a schoolteacher friend of mine- kids don't call each other gay slurs anymore, at least at her upper-middle class school. They've replaced it with "cuck" and "incel" (this was several years ago so they've probably moved onto new terms), but would be mortified to hear f-g on the playground. They would be ostracized for blurting it out.

Sorry, but there is just no way that my desire to procreate and the resulting cognitive dissonance resulting from the idea of non-procreative sex is a social construct. Like fucking an apple pie, in a sense.

It's good that the slurs are going away in any case.

Most of the time we just end up blowing each other. It doesn't leave itself to tons of spontaneity although the "fudge packing" thing is utterly preposterous and says far more about you beasts. I guess you don't really need to have the acute awareness about digestive health, your diets in regards to it or asshole hygiene that bottoms do. Trust me, there's no fudge involved. It's also far less, "Oh yeah, I wanna fuck this dude in the ass!" and more like, "Damn, you're cute. How do we work with what we got here and physically express this?"

 

[nac386]

Yeah, I know you think I'm a catty little who cries about homophobia while disregarding other forms of blatant discrimination. The former could honestly keep me entirely occupied if it was all I wanted to talk about. Are LGB people more tolerable than Blacks, Hispanics or Muslims? Maybe, although there's some evidence to the contrary. I seriously doubt posts like these (a retread subject) win me any points though. I'm also done talking about human genetic variation on this forum, period. The slightest misinterpretation of what I'm putting across just isn't worth the trouble.

Gays are only tolerated in “conservative” circles for the degree to which they can be used as a foil against even less desirable groups like blacks, Muslims, and transgendered people. Much like Asians are often used as a foil against black people whenever it becomes convenient, but are otherwise generally disregarded.

 

[weed]

screw you @tonni

I hope you see this every time you close your eyes.

 

[Deleted member 539235]

you'll have to work harder than that to break @tonni