War Room Lounge v78: Figure someone will make a thread eventually.

Status
Not open for further replies.
PolishHeadlock2 said:
Highly doubtful
Click to expand...

Notice how he cried that I needed help, and then all his buddies conveniently start replying shortly thereafter...

1oy9av.jpg
 
Anung Un Rama said:
Of course perfection is impossible, but journalistic integrity isn't. Attacking the media has been one of the pillars upon which Trump has built his cult. Correcting themselves and treading carefully should be a no brainer, but obviously isn't. This particular story by itself is just humiliating, but in the context of the last 3 years should not just be blown off as not-Trump related. When you hear people rightfully saying 'Trump is a symptom not the underlining problem', realize that this is part of the cause.
Click to expand...
Haven't read the rest of the thread yet, but this is what the headline says now, "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, extremist leader of Islamic State, dies at 48". And it's on the obituaries page. Using it as an excuse to suggest journalistic malfeasance is silly, imo. And how quickly does a correction have to be made to be acceptable? In this case it appears to be less than a day. Do you still have a complaint now?
 
Another fine tweet that has aged like milk
5hopb0isy5v31.png
 
Crazy Diamond said:
Haven't read the rest of the thread yet, but this is what the headline says now, "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, extremist leader of Islamic State, dies at 48". And it's on the obituaries page. Using it as an excuse to suggest journalistic malfeasance is silly, imo. And how quickly does a correction have to be made to be acceptable? In this case it appears to be less than a day. Do you still have a complaint now?
Click to expand...

They only changed it, because their headline practically blowing the dude, was called out for the bullshit it was. They were definitely fucking around, and trying to lessen the achievement of getting this dude. All because Trump's administration got him.

The real question is, what would the media have to do to make you believe they're compromised by political activists and hacks?
 
HereticBD said:
They only changed it, because their headline practically blowing the dude, was called out for the bullshit it was. They were definitely fucking around, and trying to lessen the achievement of getting this dude. All because Trump's administration got him.
Click to expand...

This is crazy talk, of course. "The only reason this line is moving so slowly is that the grocer is a liberal who hates me"-level crazy.

Also, the headline wasn't "practically blowing the dude."
 
HereticBD said:
They only changed it, because their headline practically blowing the dude, was called out for the bullshit it was. They were definitely fucking around, and trying to lessen the achievement of getting this dude. All because Trump's administration got him.

The real question is, what would the media have to do to make you believe they're compromised by political activists and hacks?
Click to expand...
Well, it would likely originate somewhere other than the obituaries page; that's about all I can say for certain.
 
Sketch said:
Jack said that to Cubo. That Cubo should kill himself.
Click to expand...
Credit to JVS for producing such a low gaff to post ratio that you've had to resort to milking that one for so long.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,185
Messages
57,973,246
Members
175,888
Latest member
whatsername

Share this page

Back
Top