War Room Lounge v67: Is Australia Real?

[Rational Poster]

@Kafir-kun and @HereticBD :

I like both of you guys a lot, so I’m gonna pull a @Cubo de Sangre and sit on the sidelines to avoid taking a strong position that might offend someone.

As for everyone else, I like all of you—even @Trotsky and @Limbo Pete (my most heated detractors). Each of you brings something to the table. You are all great in your own way. All of you, except @Rational Poster , for whom I feel nothing.

That's because you don't feel anything you fucking sociopath

 

[Trotsky]

Even does the greatest presentations. Chills.

Imo:

1. Barry Sanders
2. Marshall Faulk
3. Jim Brown
4. Walter Payton
5. Adrian Peterson
6. OJ Simpson
7. Eric Dickerson
8. LaDainian Tomlinson
9. Emmitt Smith
10. Earl Campbell

 

[PolishHeadlock2]

Imo:

1. Barry Sanders
2. Marshall Faulk
3. Jim Brown
4. Walter Payton
5. Adrian Peterson
6. OJ Simpson
7. Eric Dickerson
8. LaDainian Tomlinson
9. Emmitt Smith
10. Earl Campbell

I think Dickerson has to be in the Top 3 imo. He had 2 1800 yard seasons and a 2100 yard season, lead the league in rushing 4 times

Jim Brown dominated his era more than nay RB leading the league in rushing every year except 1. Ran for 1500 yards in a 12 game season and over 1800 in 14 game season.

 

[HockeyBjj]

So uh..... How far does the no accusations rule stretch when someone makes a thread about a 40 year old man having sex with a 7 year old and this is his comment?

Hey man, stuff happens. Dude has a f’d up sexual preference. He didn’t rape her either. It was consensual.

I think he could learn his lesson and get his head on straight with a up to 10 year prison sentence..

Mods, that thread is at best nothing but ban hammer bait and at worst, the kind of thread that gets sherdog media attention for all the wrong reasons.

 

[JamesRussler]

 

[JamesRussler]

That's because you don't feel anything you fucking sociopath

That’s not true. I love everyone. <3
Except you. I am ambivalent toward you.

 

[HereticBD]

So uh..... How far does the no accusations rule stretch when someone makes a thread about a 40 year old man having sex with a 7 year old and this is his comment?



Mods, that thread is at best nothing but ban hammer bait and at worst, the kind of thread that gets sherdog media attention for all the wrong reasons.

Give 'em a bit. I'm sure once they see it, the thread and the poster will be deleted.

 

[Trotsky]

So uh..... How far does the no accusations rule stretch when someone makes a thread about a 40 year old man having sex with a 7 year old and this is his comment?



Mods, that thread is at best nothing but ban hammer bait and at worst, the kind of thread that gets sherdog media attention for all the wrong reasons.

Yeesh.

I thought he was going to present a genuine issue of criminal sentencing and public perception of it: how sex offenders that commit minor offense shouldn't get massive sentences that are disproportionate to the harm of their offense just as a way of gaining support from the "hang them all" virtue signaling types that want to beat their chest about how much they abhor the conduct more than others. That is a legitimate issue. A lot of nonviolent statutory offenders are over-sentenced as a way for judges to make examples of them: for instance, an 18 year old who gets prison time for getting caught with his 16 yo girlfriend.

His position? Holy gross.

 

[Rational Poster]

That’s not true. I love everyone. <3
Except you. I am ambivalent toward you.

 

[JamesRussler]

 

[Gregolian]

A lot of nonviolent statutory offenders are over-sentenced as a way for judges to make examples of them: for instance, an 18 year old who gets prison time for getting caught with his two-years-young girlfriend.

I fucking hate those cases.

 

[Trotsky]

I fucking hate those cases.

I trust you gathered that I meant "two years younger" instead of "two years young."


The latter offender should get stiff prison time.

 

[Gregolian]

I trust you gathered that I meant "two years younger" instead of "two years young."


The latter offender should get stiff prison time.

I did.

I’m saying I hate those 16 year old has sex with 18 year old and 18 year old gets smacked with a felony sex offense and lifetime registration requirement.

Anyone just about with a 2 year old victim... if they're white house them with the blacks or Mexican gangs, if they're a minority house them with the AB and Neo Nazis and let the prison justice system handle it.

 

[Trotsky]

I did.

I’m saying I hate those 16 year old has sex with 18 year old and 18 year old gets smacked with a felony sex offense and lifetime registration requirement.

Yeah, it's rough. And pretty much a guarantee the kid never makes it anywhere in life. But attempts to codify leniency in sentencing will trigger bad faith "they support sex offenders! they're endangering our kids!" attacks from political opponents. And the attacks will be effective.

 

[Lord Coke]

We are with the Captain because the Captain is one of us.


https://crimeresearch.org/2019/09/b...anslation-of-john-lotts-book-the-war-on-guns/

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro announced the new Portuguese translation of John Lott’s book, The War on Guns
3 SEP , 2019

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro on Instagram announced the new Portuguese translation of Dr. John Lott’s book, The War on Guns. We don’t have a link to the Portuguese translation.

The quote from the book goes as follows: “Possessing a weapon is undoubtedly the most effective means for protecting oneself against criminals. Women and the elderly benefit most from possessing a weapon …”

It has caused Dr. Lott to actually set up an Instagram account available here.

 

[Gregolian]

Yeah, it's rough. And pretty much a guarantee the kid never makes it anywhere in life. But attempts to codify leniency in sentencing will trigger bad faith "they support sex offenders! they're endangering our kids!" attacks from political opponents. And the attacks will be effective.

Don't get me wrong I understand some posters like that I've discussed this with parents not being fans of that outlook... but from a practical standpoint it bothers me.

Maybe make consensual stuff between a 16 and 18 year old be a misdemeanor with no registration requirement?

EDIT:
Also just called TS in that thread in question Warren Jeffs. Part of me thinks he won't get the reference.

 

[HereticBD]

I did.

I’m saying I hate those 16 year old has sex with 18 year old and 18 year old gets smacked with a felony sex offense and lifetime registration requirement.

What about a 63 year old caught with a 16 year old?

I know the age limit seems arbitrary when it involves another teen, but the law still has to be enforced equally across the board, no? Statutory is statutory.

 

[Islam Imamate]

We are with the Captain because the Captain is one of us.

Your shilling for Bolsonaro is embarrassing, the guy is is scum and I say that as someone who agrees with him on guns.

 

[Gregolian]

What about a 63 year old caught with a 16 year old?

I know the age limit seems arbitrary when it involves another teen, but the law still has to be enforced equally across the board, no? Statutory is statutory.

For me with the "teens" at about 19 is where my cutoff is for someone to be with like a 16 or 17 year old. Once you add the ability to add alcohol to the equation legally is where I start to struggle some to avoid some 21 year old lording that over an impressionable 16 year old:
"Give me a blow job and I buy you the Smirnoff Ice"

That sorta shit. Hell, I just screened a case where a 19 year old did that to a 14 year old cause he had a 21 year old brother that thought the Juul pods and booze he was getting was for the 19 year old.

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

Don't get me wrong I understand some posters like that I've discussed this with parents not being fans of that outlook... but from a practical standpoint it bothers me.

Maybe make consensual stuff between a 16 and 18 year old be a misdemeanor with no registration requirement?

EDIT:
Also just called TS in that thread in question Warren Jeffs. Part of me thinks he won't get the reference.

I had a co-worker/friend back in my 20s, who I knew was a little kind of pervy.

I mean, it's one thing to say, "oh, damn..that girl's hot!!" he would always take it one step further with his comments..

anyways, a mutual co-worker had a daughter. and she needed to find a baby sitter for her 9 year old.

long story short, she made the mistake of thinking she could trust this guy. so he watches her, he insists he did nothing wrong (I never touched her!) but if I remember correctly he was going to plead guilty to indecent liberties, or maybe Child mol 2. he was going to get little time for that, but here's the catch.

he took pictures of this girl and had it on his PC. The Feds took over the case...and hit him with Child Porn charges...I think he got 15 years plus for that.