- Joined
- Nov 28, 2010
- Messages
- 20,615
- Reaction score
- 7,419
So i guess posting nudity is only a perma ban for some and not others.
?
So i guess posting nudity is only a perma ban for some and not others.
Our good friend @Inquisitor got banned for posting nudity, yet he has been allowed back.
Our good friend @Inquisitor got banned for posting nudity, yet he has been allowed back.
If you want to cite examples where it wasn't relevant to the matter at hand, I'm all ears and I will acknowledge my fault. On the other hand, that post, as a matter of objective fact, was of the form, if I were a different person in a different time and different place, boy I'd give them what for. In my view it is certainly less of an issue than a pic of a chick wielding a massive evil looking knife and that's the only reason I bring it up. I love you, man. Nothing personal.Under your idea, everyone just needs to say “in an alternate universe” to bypass the rules. It does sound a bit like a grudge as you’ve brought it up a few times now.
Post a picture of a fully nude woman and see if you can get the same treatment.Weil I just posted nudity, too
Our good friend @Inquisitor got banned for posting nudity, yet he has been allowed back.
Well I just posted nudity, too
Post a picture of a fully nude woman and see if you can get the same treatment.
The mods can't get rid of him
Hes got like mad proxy skills or something and no matter what he just pops right back up
What they outta do is figure out a way to shadow ban him so he can post nonstop but no one else can see it
Well, whatever you guys do, just don't send 10 years worth of nudes to @Ruprecht
He might say he wants them, but he definitely does not
Definitely, definitely not
Or so i've heard from a reliable source that totally isn't me
What, was it like an e-suicide, or was it homoerotic artistic like @Deorum always used to postOur good friend @Inquisitor got banned for posting nudity, yet he has been allowed back.
A dude with multiple rule violations is allowed to post full nudity and yet is allowed to get his account back. In light of another recent ban, with a much less clear rule violation, not a good look for the mods imo.
People ask me, "Pete, what in the hell did you do to get kicked off the Mod Force?"It’s the non-reply that cuts the deepest.
Jesus man.A dude with multiple rule violations is allowed to post full nudity and yet is allowed to get his account back. In light of another recent ban, with a much less clear rule violation, not a good look for the mods imo.
People ask me, "Pete, what in the hell did you do to get kicked off the Mod Force?"
And I tells em, I tells em, "Look here. If some Aussie asks to see your cheeks, you best believe that he's not talking about the ones in your pants."
What, was it like an e-suicide, or was it homoerotic artistic like @Deorum always used to post
You always talk like your life is over and shit being shit is set in stone.
Why ?
Naked woman in a vat of chocolate, you say?@Deorum was once banned for post an actual art photo of a man with his butt showing. This was a woman totally nude in a vat of chocolate? at a party. I cant wait for tge exploitation of why one was. Permaban and the other was not.
Jesus man.
Fawlty screwed Fawlty. Let it go.