I really never looked into Fawlty's history. I was here when he was posting from his Ransom account as a Ron Paul supporter, and was banned, but I never caught what for.
It was perfectly obvious to me when I was modded though that his account was on thin ice due to some excessive history of e-drama. I also caught some of the same push back on moderation and attempts to advocate for posters he thought were unfairly done by, but after a few exchanges I just ignored that.
The




thing is really clear though. For whatever reason it's a topic that's overly common in the War Room, and even lead to posters contacting Crave about




accusations.
That has to stop.
Both direct and implied accusations will not be tolerated, as spelt out in the rules.
In Fawlty's case he continued the same discussion where Trotsky had been banned for the accusation, and made the same implication by asking how he avoids sleeping with minors when using hookers in a region that's known for it. There was no excuse for it, he tagged Oeshon into the thread to continue that same discussion. Whether it was pushing back on moderation by trying to say the same thing less directly, or just trying to get back at Oeshon for Trotsky being banned is really pretty irrelevant. It won't be tolerated and he had no chances left (he'd been previously warned and carded over the same rule, although not




accusations).
It's unfortunate that the same obsession seems to be part and parcel of American politics, however to the extent that there are public accusations or cases involving political figures (or MMA fighters for that matter), that discussion will be allowed here.
Calling other posters "




defenders" and "




enablers" also won't be allowed, although we rely on people reporting those posts. I know I'm certainly not reading through that sort of shit otherwise.