Social War Room Lounge V197: Look at me, I am the captain now.

Poll or pole?


  • Total voters
    27
Status
Not open for further replies.
Or does it? <{fry}>

Sadly no. Well, not in Canada anyway.

I think we're heading towards a national pharmacy plan soon though.

In Ontario there is a provincial plan that will cover people under 25 (i think?) which is kinda new.
 
And all this time i couldnt figure out why we have so few female posters ......

Wait...are you all...guys????

giphy.gif
 
I have to apologize. I went back to source what I said, and the 33 billion number is what tax-payers would be spared under a specific plan, but the annual cost. I must have gotten the numbers mixed up.

Yea, if it was that price tag, you wouldn’t have much of a national debate of it. It is significantly costly and would certainly raise taxes. I think the main argument for it is the average person would pay less in premiums/receive an increase in pay related to how much higher their taxes would go up.

I mean even student debt is 1.6T
 
Sadly no. Well, not in Canada anyway.

I think we're heading towards a national pharmacy plan soon though.

In Ontario there is a provincial plan that will cover people under 25 (i think?) which is kinda new.

Interesting. How does it work if you want to have specific doctor(s)? So if I think John Doe is elite, am I able to just get him, whether that requires traveling farther or paying more or whatever?
 
Interesting. How does it work if you want to have specific doctor(s)? So if I think John Doe is elite, am I able to just get him, whether that requires traveling farther or paying more or whatever?

Generally you have a family doctor. If you need to see a specialist (my knee for instance) they can recommend you one or you can contact one you know of . A friend recommended one so I called his office and got an appointment.
 
Generally you have a family doctor. If you need to see a specialist (my knee for instance) they can recommend you one or you can contact one you know of . A friend recommended one so I called his office and got an appointment.

That's actually not bad then. For some reason I thought they just give you a dude and that's it. Not bad at all.
 
What lol nah y'all can't be serious. I refuse to believe. <SelenaWow>

Not sure if they're serious, but it's not remotely accurate "information" you're getting. Bad enough that he gets banned for no reason, now people are telling crazy lies about him when he's not here.
 
Not sure if they're serious, but it's not remotely accurate "information" you're getting. Bad enough that he gets banned for no reason, now people are telling crazy lies about him when he's not here.

Haha yeah I questioned it because I'll need some like super coop to buy. That sounded crazy.
 
Michèle Flournoy wants to increase spending because the budget is insufficient to deal with China.

I know I'm not a math magician. Either my math is wrong or China knows how to stretch a dollar. Or warmongers gonna warmonger.

0053-defense-comparison.png
image.jpg
16878.jpg
 
Not sure if they're serious, but it's not remotely accurate "information" you're getting. Bad enough that he gets banned for no reason, now people are telling crazy lies about him when he's not here.

Based on the mod’s little history lesson, he probably should not have been allowed back in the first place. He had more than enough in his history to just be banned.

But I don’t really understand how the “no :eek::eek::eek::eek: accusations” rule is applied. Apparently you can call anyone a :eek::eek::eek::eek:file, as long as they don’t post here. People do that every day. You can call people :eek::eek::eek::eek:file defenders. You can say half the country wants to “normalize :eek::eek::eek::eek:filia.” That’s all allowed. But Fawlty was not allowed to ask a guy who brags about paying for sex how he knows they are of age? That seems bizarre.

@Ruprecht is that accurate?
 
Based on the mod’s little history lesson, he probably should not have been allowed back in the first place. He had more than enough in his history to just be banned.

But I don’t really understand how the “no :eek::eek::eek::eek: accusations” rule is applied. Apparently you can call anyone a :eek::eek::eek::eek:file, as long as they don’t post here. People do that every day. You can call people :eek::eek::eek::eek:file defenders. You can say half the country wants to “normalize :eek::eek::eek::eek:filia.” That’s all allowed. But Fawlty was not allowed to ask a guy who brags about paying for sex how he knows they are of age? That seems bizarre.

@Ruprecht is that accurate?
Homer Simpson contacted Crave about it, so he ruined it for everyone.
 
Based on the mod’s little history lesson, he probably should not have been allowed back in the first place. He had more than enough in his history to just be banned.

But I don’t really understand how the “no :eek::eek::eek::eek: accusations” rule is applied. Apparently you can call anyone a :eek::eek::eek::eek:file, as long as they don’t post here. People do that every day. You can call people :eek::eek::eek::eek:file defenders. You can say half the country wants to “normalize :eek::eek::eek::eek:filia.” That’s all allowed. But Fawlty was not allowed to ask a guy who brags about paying for sex how he knows they are of age? That seems bizarre.

@Ruprecht is that accurate?

I don't think that's true? If you start calling GSP a, *insert, I think you'll be banned.
 
I don't think that's true? If you start calling GSP a, *insert, I think you'll be banned.

Only because he’s a fighter. Call Joe Biden or Donald Trump a :eek::eek::eek::eek:, and it’s 100% okay here. It really doesn’t make any sense.

I think they need to decide whether making unfounded accusations like that is allowed or not, and apply it consistently.
 
Only because he’s a fighter. Call Joe Biden or Donald Trump a :eek::eek::eek::eek:, and it’s 100% okay here. It really doesn’t make any sense.

What? I swear I've seen DaDubbs dished out for someone calling Trump an, *insert, lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top