I was always a bit partial to Che because of romanticizing The Motorcycle Diaries as a kid.
It's not so much being wrong but not approaching the problem in such a way that would allow you to work toward being (more) right.
I wasn't particularly looking to give out a perfect solution with that original post, just to say that losses will be had if that certain proposal were to happen. I tend to start from the bottom up - okay, these are the problems, now how do we fix them.
And yet, Google hasn't told me whether private loans are paid for in advance or not. AFAIK, loans given from banks are to be paid, or else it's a total loss. If I'm wrong, then you need to direct me to a proper source.
It's a bit silly that you're trying to offload guilt about your own ignorance by being a prick about it.
I just started with a post about money being lost if all student debt is forgiven. I may have chose the wrong word (would've replaced college with fed/private institutes) but the initial point remains. Then had a mini debate with Jack, established that I was right about the federal government losing money because "they'll make a little less revenue for a long period of time." Then @Tycho Brah tells me to stop, and the tribe starts liking posts. What is going on here
How was I being a prick? In what way, was I being a prick in any of this lol. He told me to stop, so I started asking questions.
You told me to stop, then I asked to tell me how I was wrong...but I'm the prick.
I tried, and couldn't get the proper answers, so I started asking here. I can't get any information on how banks pay for student loans - obviously I'm pretty sure they're insured, but insured by who, and paid for how?
