Thanks. I'll look it over before I comment further other than to say it really doesn't make sense (to my admittedly layman brain) unless it's very much harder to catch that way than the other or unless it's restricted to only some rare strain(s) of the virus, so I want to understand where they are coming from.
Edit: Whoa. The very first thing I read is it "cannot be ruled out". That is not at all the same thing as saying it is confirmed to exist in the wild. Not even fucking close. Anyway, carrying on. I'll read it before I say any more.
@JDragon
I am very disappointed in you. I didn't think you were one of those "read half an article and then post a half-truth" types we see so much around here.
You said, "In any case, people also need to understand that
aerosol transmission is real and now also has been accepted as real by scientists and the WHO. If you are in a confined space with other people, open the fucking window. And wear a mask if you cannot distance sufficiently."
The article you quoted doesn't say that. It says, "“
Short-range aerosol transmission, particularly in specific indoor locations, such as crowded and inadequately ventilated spaces over a prolonged period of time with infected persons cannot be ruled out,” the WHO now
states. Previously, the organization maintained that airborne transmission was unlikely to occur outside the hospital setting, where some procedures can generate super-small particles that linger in the air longer than large respiratory drops.
This change comes after a
letter appeared in the journal
Clinical Infectious Diseases, co-signed by 239 scientists and engineers, which implored WHO and other public health agencies that “it’s time to address airborne transmission of Covid-19.” With the WHO’s recognition of this mode of transmission, the authors hope, communities can think more about the ventilation of indoor spaces and perhaps engineer solutions to make these spaces safer."
Note how much hedging there is in the statement by the WHO. I repeat, "cannot be ruled out" doesn't mean it's "real and has been accepted as real by scientists and the WHO". It says exactly what I have known for some time. There are circumstances where the virus can travel father than the 2 metre distance currently recommended for physical distancing, mainly small spaces where the ventilation may not be adequate, or where it may cause air flow that actually spreads the virus. That is not what is commonly understood among virologists as an airborne strain. If COVID fit that description, pretty much everyone who could catch it would have already in may parts of the world. Now, you might claim that happened but so many of those were asymptomatic those cases went unnoticed, but that isn't reflected in test results here or elsewhere.
I'm not saying not to be careful, especially indoors, but you're clearly exaggerating.