- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,963
- Reaction score
- 35,163
I think we've had this conversation before a while back, but you're making my point as much as Trots did. There's no way someone like you would say "hmm I see lots of liberal bias" in the media, just like some others flying Red would never say "wow lots of conservative bias in the media". Mainstream tv bias is as blatant as it's ever been. The reasons are debatable, but it's overly present. The conversation has removed from why things have regressed and is pretty much a form of finger pointing now.
I understand what you're saying, but I'm saying that your approach determines your conclusion. If you assume that it's all narratives and truth doesn't exist, and that there are two dimensions only, you're going to conclude that drawing accusations of bias from both sides is proof that an organization is not biased. There's no other possible conclusion if that's how you're looking at it. But I'm saying that that's not a reasonable way to look at it. If you assume that there are claims that are truer than others in an objective sense, then you have to do the work of figuring out what it is, and you identify bias by any systematic deviation from that truth. And I'd argue then (for example), that reporting that suggests that deficits are always bad (and that politicians who complain about deficits when they're out of power are sincere), is biased even if when it's politically neutral (though that's an issue that at least from 2008 to 2016, wasn't even covered in a neutral way by the MSM).
For an obvious to observe example, there is little difference in Don Lemon's CNN show vs Sean Hannity's FOX show, yet the liberal or conservative viewer refuses to denounce "their show" due to that exact bias I am referring to, while blasting the other show.
Again, if you assume that there's little difference and that they're exactly as skewed in their approach (both opinion shows, of course), then, yes, anyone who thinks one is less biased than the other is himself biased (and note then that your "conclusion" is really just an assumption). If you accept the possibility that one could be less biased than the other, then you have to look into it, and find that maybe that possibility is realized, maybe it isn't.