- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 22,728
- Reaction score
- 2,859
HBK's matches are overrated. The Taker matches, the HHH matches, good, but "GOAT matches" not even close. He has had some good matches against lesser guys, but definitely not against higher guys. Bret brings out the best matches in anything he touches. Bret had real classic purely amazing 10/10 wrestling matches with Bulldog, multiple with Owen (WMX, SummerSlam 94), Benoit, Austin, Mr. Perfect, Diesel in 95 (of all people), etc. Most of those dudes best match in their career was with Bret. The 1-2-3 Kid as an unknown local had the best match of his career, and probably the best match in RAW history against Bret. HBK can't make these statements without throwing in overrated spotfests like the Taker/HHH matches.
No, HBK was a known ratings killer. His "Childhood Dream" storyline during his first title run was a complete tank. Vince wanted to go with Vader in SS 96 due to him too, but HBK politicked his way into keeping the belt. Then he was repackaged as a way of fixing his fails (how bad are you that you have to be repackaged as the headliner). His loss and then re-win of the title in early 97 was supposed to gain him sympathy because Sid was so big/mean, but it didn't work, so Vince wanted to go back to Bret as the headliner at WM13. HBK threw a fit and refused to lose to Bret, so he faked an injury, "lost his smile", and forfeit the belt. Taker won it at WM13.
In late 97, he ran the DX gimmick and still wasn't a draw. This was blamed on WCW being at it's peak, but I don't buy this because with all their issues, if you look at the numbers for RAW weekly, after Austin won at WM14, TWO WEEKS LATER with Austin in the main event as champion they beat WCW for the first time in almost two years. This is the biggest tell imo.
Then there's HBK's return in '02. They treated it like the second coming of Jesus, yet again, he still wasn't a draw. So much so, that he won both the hardcore match at SS and the title at Survivor Series from HHH, and did such low ratings that Vince took the title from him a month later.
Etc. Could go on, but dude was never the guy WWE pretended he was. Bret was a big draw in the early 90s when headlining even though the WWE product kinda sucked, and drew nothing in WCW. But HBK was never a draw his entire career.
ive heard Cornette hint that Shawn and vince were fucking
And I legit believe it.
He was a mess.. a bad bad druggy and was politicking all over the place, he had something on Vince for sure especially after Hall and Nash bolted
Maybe before the left you could argue, easily 3 top names wild revolt together and that would be a problem.
But after that? He was still at it, he had something on Vince.
that being said I disagree about his matches, they were every bit as good as Brets.
His cell match with taker is the goat HIAC.