War Room Lounge v100: Come with me one a magical journey through time and dirty toilets

Status
Not open for further replies.
I expect Jones to destroy Reyes.

Due to this, I almost feel like putting money on Reyes. Main events often end in huge upsets when I don't expect it or don't want it.
 
Kyle is annoying. Most people who aren’t funny, but think they are tend to be annoying. BUT, he’s got a great mind for politics, he’s much more thoughtful and intelligent than his YouTube persona lets on.
 
i lost when Jones said 'aint no elite athletes coming from Apple Valley' hahahah
Apple Valley is like basically right near me. Technically it's right by Barstow, but close enough
 
cycle.jpg
 
What's the objection here?

Sanders did 39 rallies for Clinton in 13 states. Far more than Clinton did for Obama, from what I've read. Is there any evidence of O'Malley doing more? Seems like he should substantiate it if he's going to claim it.

But, yeah, @Stranger_Foreigner, it's obviously ugly, underhanded, and unnecessary, especially since Sanders has continually declined to return fire and never went after O'Malley, whose campaign was doomed instead by his complete and utter lack of message and remote national popularity.
 
Purchased. From a good Chicago style pizza place. My eyes have been opened that there are diamonds in the rough of this gluten free fad
Chicago style with a crust made entirely of sausage? Jesucristo... sounds like a heart attack tbh. Be careful out there.
 
debating whether to go to Five Guys for lunch

A) it's egregious for a meal there
B) i live in the cuts, we don't have many options. The nearest Wendy's is 42 miles away FFS, nearest In n Out is 55

We do have a Steak n Shake in the next city over, so there's that haha
 
Sanders did 39 rallies for Clinton in 13 states. Far more than Clinton did for Obama, from what I've read. Is there any evidence of O'Malley doing more? Seems like he should substantiate it if he's going to claim it.

Exactly. Who did more rallies for HRC? I'll take the Sanders side of that without even looking up the data.

Even if O'Malley had a higher number, it's a tremendously BETA move to stab a good man like Sanders in the back on the grounds that "39 rallies wasn't enough" or whatever. This kind of behavior reveals the true BETA nature of O'Malley---i.e., that he is more interested in tearing people down in the name of his career ambitions than in being constructive.
 
Sanders did 39 rallies for Clinton in 13 states. Far more than Clinton did for Obama, from what I've read. Is there any evidence of O'Malley doing more? Seems like he should substantiate it if he's going to claim it.

He was comparing himself to Bernie, not Bernie to Clinton in 2008. So the objection is that he didn't provide the supporting evidence for his claim in a Tweet?
 
it's a tremendously BETA move to stab a good man like Sanders in the back on the grounds that "39 rallies wasn't enough" or whatever. This kind of behavior reveals the true BETA nature of O'Malley---i.e., that he is more interested in tearing people down in the name of his career ambitions than in being constructive.

Hmm. If that's your thinking, it seems like you should maybe reconsider your own behavior (assuming you're suggesting that whatever "BETA" stands for is bad).
 
He was comparing himself to Bernie, not Bernie to Clinton in 2008. So the objection is that he didn't provide the supporting evidence for his claim in a Tweet?

Yes, that's the biggest objection since it's something that seems suspect and that I (and I suspect others) cannot find support for. Well, no, the biggest objection is the intent itself: to undermine Sanders with a bogus narrative that he campaigned less for Clinton than was typical or expected.
 
Sanders did 39 rallies for Clinton in 13 states. Far more than Clinton did for Obama, from what I've read. Is there any evidence of O'Malley doing more? Seems like he should substantiate it if he's going to claim it.

But, yeah, @Stranger_Foreigner, it's obviously ugly, underhanded, and unnecessary, especially since Sanders has continually declined to return fire and never went after O'Malley, whose campaign was doomed instead by his complete and utter lack of message and remote national popularity.
Not only did O’Malley wait until June to endorse Clinton,after dropping out in February, his endorsement and appearances on the campaign trail are about 0.0001% as significant as Sanders’. He may be using s political speak to reference his campaigning for her vs. Obama. He should just not talk until this election is over.
 
Not yet, he has yet to undergo the molting process. I will say he is curious.... A curious man is a glorious man....
Do i get the finder’s fee when the molting has completed?
 
Yes, that's the biggest objection since it's something that seems suspect and that I (and I suspect others) cannot find support for. Well, no, the biggest objection is the intent itself: to undermine Sanders with a bogus narrative that he campaigned less for Clinton than was typical or expected.

OK. Either way, seems very tame in proportion to the comments "Oh look, Martin O'Malley shows himself to be a child of Satan." ... "you actually supported this monster. You must re-evaluate your ability to read people."
 
@Jack V Savage
it seems like you should maybe reconsider your own behavior

I point out your flaws to help you improve. It is an act of love. O'Malley's act was one of hatred.


OK. Either way, seems very tame in proportion to the comments "Oh look, Martin O'Malley shows himself to be a child of Satan." ... "you actually supported this monster. You must re-evaluate your ability to read people."

Incorrect. There is only right and wrong, good and evil. O'Malley has showed himself to be evil.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top