WAR ROOM LOUNGE V10: It's all in the hips

[Lead]

Where the hell is this thread? Where am I right now?

It's the off topic sticky thread. I decided to answer you here rather than the thread itself cause it was starting to be not relevant to the thread

 

[Jack V Savage]

WR Group Bet team will emerge.

I'm down, but there should be a process and a vote. Maybe a little discussion, then an informal vote, then a debate (if there's disagreement), and then a final vote.

 

[dontsnitch]

It's the off topic sticky thread. I decided to answer you here rather than the thread itself cause it was starting to be not relevant to the thread

I get that part, I just can't find the thread other than clicking on your notifications and teleporting here.

 

[Lead]

I'm down, but there should be a process and a vote. Maybe a little discussion, then an informal vote, then a debate (if there's disagreement), and then a final vote.

Yea, exactly. I'm thinking a smaller group (5 to 9ish) that would go through each fight with a discussion and then each person votes and it decides the group choice. If someone gets annoyed enough at a group pick, they always can just do another parlay with only their picks. Point would be for the group to all be rooting for the same unlikely event to happen. I would think you, Fawlty and Judo all would be game as well for it.

 

[Lead]

I get that part, I just can't find the thread other than clicking on your notifications and teleporting here.

You don't see it? Look in the War Room and look at the very top where the sticky threads are. Some people never look at there.

 

[dontsnitch]

You don't see it? Look in the War Room and look at the very top where the sticky threads are. Some people never look at there.

I see five threads but not this one, don't worry about it...

 

[Lead]

I see five threads but not this one, don't worry about it...

That's a really weird glitch. There definitely are six threads.

 

[Jack V Savage]

That's a really weird glitch. There definitely are six threads.

He's probably ignoring Fawlty.

 

[Lead]

He's probably ignoring Fawlty.

Haha. You guys are weird with that. Never used the ignore feature before.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Haha. You guys are weird with that. Never used the ignore feature before.

I can't imagine using it for someone like Fawlty, but I think DS is ultra sensitive. I ignore about 50 people, but they're almost all people who just post ungrammatical one-liners or childish trashtalk-type stuff. I occasionally go through the list to purge people who have been banned. It seems that an appearance on my list is a pretty good predictor of trouble ahead. About a third of the list is currently yellow.

I make a point to read people I disagree with who are not stupid. What's the place for if you're going to be ignoring Fawlty-level posters? I guess he just likes affirmation? I think it's funny when people like sub_thug, Inga, or TGA think I hate them because I take the time to show what's wrong with their posts. It's actually a compliment. I ignore total idiots, and don't usually bother with second-to-the-bottom-tier types.

 

[Lead]

I can't imagine using it for someone like Fawlty, but I think DS is ultra sensitive. I ignore about 50 people, but they're almost all people who just post ungrammatical one-liners or childish trashtalk-type stuff. I occasionally go through the list to purge people who have been banned. It seems that an appearance on my list is a pretty good predictor of trouble ahead. About a third of the list is currently yellow.

I make a point to read people I disagree with who are not stupid. What's the place for if you're going to be ignoring Fawlty-level posters? I guess he just likes affirmation?

I don't know. I just usually breeze by posts of people who I think don't contribute much to a thread after a long long period of time. Even then, I would think once in awhile, I read their post. It's just others take a higher priority when I'm scanning through a large thread.

 

[Jack V Savage]

I don't know. I just usually breeze by posts of people who I think don't contribute much to a thread after a long long period of time. Even then, I would think once in awhile, I read their post. It's just others take a higher priority when I'm scanning through a large thread.

It also functions as kind of a reminder. I might see (taking a real name I don't remember from the list) Imalive and not immediately know, "oh don't bother with this guy." If he's on ignore, I don't even have to think about it. Only downside is that you miss threads that might be started by a shit poster but then progress to something good and you sometimes see good posters responding to someone and you don't know what's going on. But you can show ignored content.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

I think the only sous vide I've ever had (that I know of) is that starbucks egg dish and it is out of this world good. For an egg I mean.
​

But for us cheapskates with no pricey gizmo reverse searing a steak is a technique that seems kind of similar. Have you tried it? Produces an even cook throughout and a nice char on the outside, and makes it really easy to control the temp (which is nice when you're a rare and you're wife is an embarrassing medium). Works on the grill (with a good thermometer) or in an oven with a pan finish. Has to be a thick cut, though.

Brah, it's only a little over a hundred bux. But I hear ya'. Especially if you're having good results with your reverse searing. I haven't tried that, but it sounds conceptually similar to the sous vide. Cook low and slow then blast it with a sear.

Oh yeah, the other cool thing about the omelettes in a jar is you can eat 'em over the week. Like 40 seconds in the microwave and you've got breakfast or a good snack.

 

[sickc0d3r]

Brah, it's only a little over a hundred bux. But I hear ya'. Especially if you're having good results with your reverse searing. I haven't tried that, but it sounds conceptually similar to the sous vide. Cook low and slow then blast it with a sear.

Oh yeah, the other cool thing about the omelettes in a jar is you can eat 'em over the week. Like 40 seconds in the microwave and you've got breakfast or a good snack.

Yeah, actually sounds pretty useful and the results look great.

 

[Fawlty]

No respect when Chiesa is the favorite v Pettis

 

[Fawlty]

That's right get fucked Mike! No-fighting shit talking trick, taste it.


ed, I'm not even much of a Pettis fan, dunno where that came from lol

 

[Quipling]

No respect when Chiesa is the favorite v Pettis

What a strange fight. Happy with the ending, though.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Weird to see Pettis looking good.

 

[Quipling]

That's right get fucked Mike! No-fighting shit talking trick, taste it.

ed, I'm not even much of a Pettis fan, dunno where that came from lol

Chiesa was being a lazy cocky dick and got what was coming to him?

 

[Lead]

Nice fight for Pettis. Not sure if he got in Michael's head cause you never see some of what went on the ground. Getting caught in a triangle these days (though he transitioned) is rough.