This is a really bad faith, distorted reading of my take. In fact this is much more in line with your thinking and I'll prove it with reference to our actual posts, something you never do when you misrepresent my posts.
First off let's address the issue of affordable housing in the sense of government subsidized housing, is that something I support?
So right off the bat characterizing me as someone who supports "affordable housing" when I'm very clear that I want more market rate housing strikes me as dishonest.
Now about the fact that they're building over a farm on the outskirts of the city, what have I said about that? Let's see
Anyone who honestly reads me posts on this topic would see that your characterization is wildly bad faith. You have no excuse because some of those posts I quoted above were from past conversations we've had. If anything you are the one who wants to build over farmland.
You don't explicitly say as much but its the logical conclusion of your ideas since you don't want to allow multifamily housing to be built in existing suburbs and you think such communities should be built further from city centers.
The result of that is that farmland and nature preserves at the edge of cities get built over because the existing single family suburbs come nowhere close to meeting demand for housing. So in sum not only is that story not the kind of thing I advocate for, I in fact advocate for the opposite while in fact that kind of story is the logical conclusion of your own positions.
Or in other words, you're a liar, a thief, and a fraud.
