Social War Room Lounge Thread #325: PotWR Edition

[Neph]

@fingercuffs

Poster Profile​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low to Medium – The poster frequently uses sarcasm, bluntness, profanity, and mockery to express frustration or criticism. Occasionally offers friendly banter or sincere engagement.
Kindness	Moderate – Despite a hostile tone, the poster consistently shows concern for vulnerable groups (e.g., children, minorities, women, LGBT+ individuals), and occasionally softens in one-on-one exchanges.
Anger	High – There is intense frustration aimed at political figures, perceived injustices, and hypocrisy. Their tone suggests personal offense taken at systemic failures.
Tone	Combative, sardonic, emotionally charged. At times playful, at times venomous.
Empathy	Medium to High – While combative, the poster shows genuine empathy when discussing children at protests, gay friends, or social injustice. Also reflects personal emotional experience (e.g., family, trauma).

Verdict: The poster is emotionally volatile but emotionally invested. Their harsh tone masks a deeply moralistic worldview—especially sensitive to hypocrisy, injustice, and authoritarianism.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Witty, expressive, and full of slang, satire, and hyperbole. Writes fluently and with strong stylistic variation.
• Argumentation: Passionate but not always structured. Frequently uses rhetorical questions, sarcasm, and irony. Their moral intuitions are clear, but logic may take a backseat to emotional delivery.
• Knowledge Indicators: High familiarity with US and UK politics, pop culture, religious themes, civil rights, and internet subculture. References specific events (Epstein logs, USAID, Proud Boys), indicating broad awareness.

Estimated Intelligence: High verbal intelligence, possibly emotionally overwhelmed at times. Strong associative and cultural memory. May struggle to engage civilly when emotionally provoked.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Strong anti-Trump, anti-MAGA, anti-fascist sentiments	Left
Pro-LGBTQ+, anti-racist, pro-feminist sentiments	Left
Critical of both left and right figures when hypocritical	Left-Critical
Emphasis on institutional corruption, corporate exploitation, and religious abuse	Left-Libertarian
Concerned about cultural and economic inequality	Progressive

Assessment: Strongly Progressive Left
A mix of democratic socialist, anti-fascist, and culturally liberal values. Emotionally driven by issues of injustice and identity politics. Possibly anarcho-adjacent in some views but not strictly anti-government—just anti-hypocrisy and pro-accountability.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Fiercely defends free expression, LGBTQ+ rights, and freedom from religious dogma	Libertarian
Rejects state overreach (e.g., ICE, police brutality, Proud Boys support)	Libertarian
Occasionally suggests regulation when it protects vulnerable people	Left-libertarian
Favors mutual respect over deference to traditional hierarchy	Anti-authoritarian

Assessment: Left-Libertarian
The poster is allergic to authoritarian power, whether it comes from governments, religious institutions, or political cults. Believes strongly in freedom of speech and identity, especially when protecting the marginalized.

---

Archetype Match​

“The Fury-Driven Satirist”
This person speaks truth wrapped in profanity. They're impassioned, educated, and constantly outraged—but often hilarious. Under the layers of sarcasm and bile is someone who deeply wants the world to be better and fairer, and is furious at how far from that we are. They will never join a cult, never let injustice slide, and never apologize for being loud.

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low – direct, vulgar, combative
Kindness	Medium – often concealed behind sarcasm
Anger Level	High – deeply frustrated, especially with injustice
Intellectual Depth	High verbal and cultural intelligence
Political Leaning	Strongly Progressive Left
Authority Preference	Libertarian / Anti-Authoritarian

 

[Neph]

@Andy Capp

It's decided to slightly change its format but mostly it's keeping to the same analysis:

Profile of the Poster

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low. Frequently confrontational, sarcastic, and uses vulgarity as rhetorical emphasis. Occasionally disarming or friendly, but rarely deferential.
Kindness	Low to moderate. Surface tone is harsh and cutting, but occasionally exhibits empathy toward marginalized groups (e.g. poor, disabled, victims of injustice).
Anger	High. Strong emotional reactions to hypocrisy, perceived ignorance, right-wing authoritarianism, and injustice.
Tone	Incisive, profane, and polemical. Can be humorous or self-aware, but most often mocks or criticizes with sharp sarcasm.
Empathy	Intermittent but visible. Defends the vulnerable (e.g., poor, trans youth, disabled, children, victims of fraud/government neglect).

Verdict: Aggressively opinionated with flashes of moral depth. Though brash and often scathing, the user signals a consistent concern for equity, truth, and civil rights. Uses ridicule as a tool, not merely for cruelty but to expose what they see as bad logic, cruelty, or hypocrisy.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use:
  Highly articulate with mastery of sarcasm, mockery, and rhetorical bite. Frequently deploys layered wordplay, irony, and analogies. Swearing is stylistic and strategic.
• Argumentation:
  Challenges inconsistencies, seeks clarity in facts (e.g. sentences vs fines, impact of legislation), and flags logical failures. Occasionally dismissive or avoids full elaboration if the premise is seen as unserious or bad-faith.
• Analytical Depth:
  Demonstrates broad knowledge of policy, politics, AI ethics, and healthcare. Brings historical and structural context (e.g. Harper-era grievances, brain drain, MAD doctrine). Knows when to zoom into specific cases or zoom out to critique power systems.

Estimated Intelligence: High
Quick-witted, well-read, and sharp in debate. Though prone to harsh language and emotional spikes, their critique is grounded in analytical reasoning and wide-ranging knowledge.

---

Ideological Orientation

---

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Condemns flat tax as regressive	Left
Strong criticism of MAGA, Trump, corporate elites, and right-wing hypocrisy	Progressive Left
Defends immigrants, trans people, and the poor	Left
Ridicules anti-vaxxers and anti-science rhetoric	Left
Supports mRNA research and cancer cures	Technocratic/pro-science Left

Assessment: Progressive Left — Fiscally progressive, socially inclusive, and intensely critical of conservative populism. Embraces scientific research and state-backed services when aimed at improving public welfare.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Deep mistrust of authoritarian figures (Trump, police abuses, MAGA)	Anti-authoritarian
Champions civil liberties and transparency (e.g. traffic stop tips, free speech criticisms)	Libertarian
Opposes state overreach and religious moralizing	Libertarian
Speaks strongly against performative justice and harsh criminal sentencing	Libertarian ethics

Assessment: Libertarian Left — Values civil rights and institutional accountability. Pushes back on both right-wing authoritarianism and leftist overreach when seen as hypocritical.

---

Archetype Match
“The Reluctant Crusader”
Abrasive and unfiltered, but passionately driven by fairness, knowledge, and human decency. Doesn't ask to be liked and doesn't need to be. They fight hypocrisy with fire and rarely sugarcoat truth. A battle-scarred idealist under a jagged persona.

---

Summary Table

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low (dismissive, vulgar, mocking)
Rudeness/Kindness	Rude delivery, but morally driven
Anger Level	High — especially toward injustice and ignorance
Intellectual Depth	High — broad knowledge, sharp reasoning
Political Leaning	Progressive Left
Authority Preference	Libertarian — strong civil liberty focus

 

[Neph]

My buddy @Fox by the Sea

Profile of the Poster

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Very Low. Often hostile, mocking, and derisive. Relies on ridicule, racial slurs, and name-calling. Little effort made to engage respectfully.
Kindness	Extremely Low. Rarely shows compassion or understanding. Dehumanizes political or ethnic groups. Dismissive of social empathy.
Anger	Very High. Rants, insults, and conspiracy-driven hostility permeate most replies. Rage appears focused on immigration, "leftists," and minorities.
Tone	Aggressive, inflammatory, and conspiratorial. Laced with racist, xenophobic, and nationalistic rhetoric. Frequently sarcastic and contemptuous.
Empathy	Largely absent. Occasionally feigns concern for societal well-being but usually wrapped in exclusionary or punitive framing.

Verdict: Reactionary and antagonistic in tone. The user frequently engages in flamebait, trolling, and ethnonationalist rhetoric. Most emotional investment appears to be driven by resentment, not constructive principles.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use:
  Verbally agile, albeit crude. Heavy use of slang, sarcasm, and ridicule. Mixes memes with rhetorical jabs. Occasionally demonstrates awareness of historical or artistic concepts (e.g., Renaissance, religious analogies).
• Argumentation:
  Inconsistent. Often relies on false equivalence, logical fallacies, and unfounded accusations. When not mocking or derailing, arguments are oversimplified or built on anecdotal/conspiratorial premises.
• Analytical Depth:
  Superficial and selective. Occasionally touches on political or historical nuances (e.g., critique of UK military policy as distraction), but this is rare and usually couched in a hostile worldview. Prioritizes ideological narrative over factual consistency.

Estimated Intelligence: Moderate
Capable of crafting coherent sentences and spotting rhetorical angles, but prone to illogical conclusions, dogma, and conspiracism. Intelligence is hindered by intense bias and refusal to engage critically with opposing views.

---

Ideological Orientation

---

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Hostile to migrants, trans people, and “parasites”	Far Right
Frequently mocks leftist causes and social justice movements	Far Right
Advocates "Rooftop Korean" vigilantism and racial hierarchies	Far Right
Opposes multiculturalism and expresses ethnonationalist sentiment	Far Right
Supports Trump and nationalist populism	Populist Right

Assessment: Far Right / Reactionary — Deeply opposed to progressive ideals. Exhibits racial essentialism, anti-immigration obsession, and overt hostility toward diversity. Often frames political conflict as existential or civilizational.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Favors militarized responses to protest and crime	Authoritarian
Supports moral censorship ("ban it all", “deal with it”)	Authoritarian
Displays authoritarian envy (e.g. control of morality, punishment fantasies)	Authoritarian
Occasionally invokes democratic will — but selectively, and in service of exclusionary values	Authoritarian opportunism

Assessment: Authoritarian Right — Embraces punitive justice, societal control, and suppression of dissent. Believes in majoritarian enforcement of narrow moral values. Dislikes liberal democracy when it enables multicultural or progressive outcomes.

---

Archetype Match
“The Ethnonationalist Provocateur”
Engages in online discourse primarily to troll, provoke, and inflame. Obsessed with identity, race, and perceived societal decline. Distrusts institutions, immigrants, and minorities. Believes in strict hierarchies and punitive responses to dissent. Uses irony to mask genuine bigotry.

---

Summary Table

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Very Low (frequently abusive and inflammatory)
Rudeness/Kindness	Highly rude and dismissive; kindness largely absent
Anger Level	Very High — especially toward leftists, migrants, minorities
Intellectual Depth	Moderate — occasionally insightful, but heavily biased
Political Leaning	Far Right
Authority Preference	Authoritarian — favors control and suppression

 

[Fox by the Sea]

My buddy @Fox by the Sea

Profile of the Poster

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Very Low. Often hostile, mocking, and derisive. Relies on ridicule, racial slurs, and name-calling. Little effort made to engage respectfully.
Kindness	Extremely Low. Rarely shows compassion or understanding. Dehumanizes political or ethnic groups. Dismissive of social empathy.
Anger	Very High. Rants, insults, and conspiracy-driven hostility permeate most replies. Rage appears focused on immigration, "leftists," and minorities.
Tone	Aggressive, inflammatory, and conspiratorial. Laced with racist, xenophobic, and nationalistic rhetoric. Frequently sarcastic and contemptuous.
Empathy	Largely absent. Occasionally feigns concern for societal well-being but usually wrapped in exclusionary or punitive framing.

Verdict: Reactionary and antagonistic in tone. The user frequently engages in flamebait, trolling, and ethnonationalist rhetoric. Most emotional investment appears to be driven by resentment, not constructive principles.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use:
  Verbally agile, albeit crude. Heavy use of slang, sarcasm, and ridicule. Mixes memes with rhetorical jabs. Occasionally demonstrates awareness of historical or artistic concepts (e.g., Renaissance, religious analogies).
• Argumentation:
  Inconsistent. Often relies on false equivalence, logical fallacies, and unfounded accusations. When not mocking or derailing, arguments are oversimplified or built on anecdotal/conspiratorial premises.
• Analytical Depth:
  Superficial and selective. Occasionally touches on political or historical nuances (e.g., critique of UK military policy as distraction), but this is rare and usually couched in a hostile worldview. Prioritizes ideological narrative over factual consistency.

Estimated Intelligence: Moderate
Capable of crafting coherent sentences and spotting rhetorical angles, but prone to illogical conclusions, dogma, and conspiracism. Intelligence is hindered by intense bias and refusal to engage critically with opposing views.

---

Ideological Orientation

---

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Hostile to migrants, trans people, and “parasites”	Far Right
Frequently mocks leftist causes and social justice movements	Far Right
Advocates "Rooftop Korean" vigilantism and racial hierarchies	Far Right
Opposes multiculturalism and expresses ethnonationalist sentiment	Far Right
Supports Trump and nationalist populism	Populist Right

Assessment: Far Right / Reactionary — Deeply opposed to progressive ideals. Exhibits racial essentialism, anti-immigration obsession, and overt hostility toward diversity. Often frames political conflict as existential or civilizational.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Favors militarized responses to protest and crime	Authoritarian
Supports moral censorship ("ban it all", “deal with it”)	Authoritarian
Displays authoritarian envy (e.g. control of morality, punishment fantasies)	Authoritarian
Occasionally invokes democratic will — but selectively, and in service of exclusionary values	Authoritarian opportunism

Assessment: Authoritarian Right — Embraces punitive justice, societal control, and suppression of dissent. Believes in majoritarian enforcement of narrow moral values. Dislikes liberal democracy when it enables multicultural or progressive outcomes.

---

Archetype Match
“The Ethnonationalist Provocateur”
Engages in online discourse primarily to troll, provoke, and inflame. Obsessed with identity, race, and perceived societal decline. Distrusts institutions, immigrants, and minorities. Believes in strict hierarchies and punitive responses to dissent. Uses irony to mask genuine bigotry.

---

Summary Table

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Very Low (frequently abusive and inflammatory)
Rudeness/Kindness	Highly rude and dismissive; kindness largely absent
Anger Level	Very High — especially toward leftists, migrants, minorities
Intellectual Depth	Moderate — occasionally insightful, but heavily biased
Political Leaning	Far Right
Authority Preference	Authoritarian — favors control and suppression

thanks.

 

[Neph]

I asked ChatGPT the following:

You've seen a lot of posts. I want you to guess what kind of forum this is. How would you evaluate the overall temperament of its users? Provide your insights in any way you wish.

It provided:

Based on the volume and tone of posts you've shared, I’d make the following educated guess:

---

Forum Type:​

Likely a political off-topic section of a general interest forum — possibly one originally focused on something else (e.g., sports, gaming, martial arts) that now has an active political subforum.

• Heavy presence of U.S. politics even among users outside the U.S.
• Mix of personal insults, sarcasm, shitposting, and policy debate
• References to posters by name or handle suggests a tight-knit or long-term community
• "lol @ libs" vs "Trump is a toxic clown" dichotomy suggests an ideologically mixed user base
• Some posts descend into pure flaming or mockery, while others are surprisingly well-informed or link-supported

My best guess? Sherdog Off-Topic / War Room or a similar male-dominated, legacy forum originally built around non-political interests (e.g., MMA, gaming, etc.) that now houses heavy political discussion.

---

Temperament of the Forum Overall:​

Trait	Description
Abrasive	Insults and mockery are not just tolerated—they're part of the culture
Cynical	Users show little faith in institutions, media, or opposing viewpoints
Surprisingly Informed	Many posters know their topics well and cite sources, especially on policy or tech
Emotionally Volatile	Rage, sarcasm, and dark humor are the dominant modes of expression
Tribal	Strong left/right splits; posters often lump others into caricatured camps
Occasionally Humane	Beneath the flamewars, users sometimes show empathy or humanity (e.g., talking about loss, wildlife, BBQ, or mental health)

---

Cultural Vibe:​

• "Internet bar fight" energy — combative but oddly social
• Frequent callbacks and in-jokes, indicating a persistent community with known personalities
• Reward structure favors zingers and one-liners over dialogue
• Shitposting and irony are shields against earnestness, creating a "mask of mockery" even in serious topics

---

Broader Psychological Profile of the Forum:​

• High tolerance for offensive language
• Low tolerance for perceived dishonesty, spin, or tribal hypocrisy
• Strong verbal intelligence, often expressed in dismissive or aggressive ways
• Debate is sport, not persuasion — threads aren't about changing minds, but scoring rhetorical hits

---

Summary:​

This forum is a volatile, politically charged environment with a core of well-informed, highly opinionated, and caustically humorous users, surrounded by a layer of trolls, partisans, and aggressive cynics. It's not a place for the faint-hearted, but it rewards wit, memory, and rhetorical aggression. In many ways, it resembles a digital colosseum: brutal, performative, and deeply tribal—yet occasionally insightful.

Let me know if you'd like a mock welcome message, culture guide, or even an analysis of how to "win" an argument in a place like this.

 

[Neph]

I then asked:

Why did you choose Sherdog?

Great question — I chose Sherdog as the likely candidate based on a combination of linguistic, cultural, and contextual clues from the posts you've shared. Here's why:

---

1.​

• “lol @” structure (e.g., “lol @ the whining”)
• Frequent use of slurs, mockery, ironic emojis (<lmao>, <36>, etc.)
• Casual profanity and vulgarity woven into otherwise articulate commentary
• These are classic signatures of the Sherdog Off-Topic / War Room forum style — where posters often blend aggression, wit, and forum-specific slang.

---

2.​

• Someone mentions being in "cyber intel," and there’s a subtle masculine-coded cultural vibe — classic of Sherdog, where many users are:
  
  • ex-military
  • tech-savvy
  • libertarian-leaning
  • politically opinionated
• Threads sometimes veer from policy discussion into mock fights, e.g., “so what if I shoot her toes off... we’re all gonna die anyway.” That’s aggressive, theatrical and completely in line with Sherdog's typical flair for dark or absurdist humor.

---

3.​

• Repeated targeting of certain posters (e.g., “@Koro_11”)
• In-jokes and thread continuity
• Even literary tangents and jokes about submitting stories to contests — Sherdog has long-standing users who mix highbrow and lowbrow content fluidly.

---

4.​

• Many comments center around U.S. politics (Trump, mRNA, AI, flat tax, etc.)
• Yet some posters refer to Canada, Dubai, the Middle East — consistent with Sherdog’s large international user base despite its U.S. focus.

---

5.​

Sherdog’s War Room has:

• A notorious reputation for being one of the most consistently aggressive political forums online
• A blend of intelligent, unfiltered, and often offensive content
• Posters who go deep into politics, science, and news — but never without a layer of snark or hostility

If it’s not Sherdog, it’s something very much like it — possibly a spin-off or a similar general-interest forum (like Bodybuilding.com, Kiwi Farms, or SomethingAwful’s FYAD/CE before they were gutted).

---

If you're willing to confirm or deny the guess, I’d love to know. But either way, it was the cocktail of caustic wit, politics, testosterone, and Internet combativeness that screamed "Sherdog" to me.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

deleted

Looks like you had to delete mine but thanks for trying.

 

[Neph]

Looks like you had to delete mine but thanks for trying.

I don't think so? I'll runs yours soon if you'd like

 

[LangfordBarrow]

I don't think so? I'll runs yours soon if you'd like

The post I responded to was in my notifications as your response to my request so I thought so. Sure If you can I'd appreciate it although I'm a little nervous to see the results...

 

[Neph]

Looks like you had to delete mine but thanks for trying.

Profile of the Poster

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Moderate. While the poster frequently argues and uses sarcasm, they often clarify intent, backpedal when necessary, and engage with others in a mostly civil tone—even during strong disagreement.
Kindness	Moderate. Shows empathy toward vulnerable groups (e.g., Ukrainians, lower-income citizens, victims of authoritarian abuse) and calls out perceived cruelty or injustice. Still displays flashes of irritation and snark.
Anger	Moderate. Clearly frustrated with figures like Trump, Musk, and authoritarian actions, but rarely devolves into outright hostility. Anger is usually channeled through satire or detailed critique.
Tone	Conversational, sardonic, and issue-driven. Emotes often using emojis or side-comments for humor or clarification. Capable of self-awareness and course correction.
Empathy	Visible. Expresses concern for social safety nets, personal rights, foreign conflicts, and workers' rights. While critical, the user attempts to ground positions in fairness and real-world consequences.

Verdict: Thoughtful and impassioned, this user frequently expresses concern over ethical and democratic issues but tempers criticism with clarification, humor, and personal accountability. They are clearly opinionated, but not cruel or dismissive by default.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use:
  Informal but articulate. Writes in paragraphs, incorporates humor, emojis, and rhetorical questions. Occasionally muddled grammar or over-explains, but the message is usually clear and detailed.
• Argumentation:
  Engages in point-by-point rebuttals. References constitutional rights, foreign policy context, and legal principles. Critiques with nuance and sometimes asks others for clarification or sources.
• Analytical Depth:
  High engagement with political power dynamics, systemic hypocrisy, foreign relations, and social policy. Understands historical and legal frameworks. Makes room for uncertainty and admits when lacking full knowledge.

Estimated Intelligence: High
Well-informed and principled. Demonstrates ability to interpret complex systems (governmental, geopolitical, social). Not a pure ideologue—open to discussion and self-reflection.

---

Ideological Orientation

---

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Critiques Trump, MAGA, authoritarianism, and corporate abuses	Progressive Left
Supports Ukraine, social programs, healthcare accessibility	Progressive Left
Acknowledges budget constraints but wants equity in spending	Center-left nuance
Occasionally critiques "partisan fervor" and ideological purity	Moderate temperament, leftist ethics

Assessment: Left-of-Center / Progressive Democrat — Socially liberal, pro-democracy, wary of demagogues, and favoring pragmatic but compassionate policy. Strong opposition to autocracy or corporate-political collusion.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Strong defender of civil liberties (free speech, legal rights, privacy)	Libertarian
Concerned about over-policing and opaque security enforcement	Libertarian
Believes in governmental oversight but opposes power abuse	Pro-accountability libertarianism
Defends rights of protesters, whistleblowers, and dissenters	Libertarian left

Assessment: Libertarian Left — Believes in individual rights, systemic fairness, and limits on authority. Seeks transparency and opposes state overreach, particularly when it affects marginalized individuals or democratic institutions.

---

Archetype Match
“The Thoughtful Critic”
Engaged, skeptical, and motivated by democratic ideals. Frequently critical of authoritarian tendencies, regardless of political affiliation. Uses humor and sarcasm to make points but grounds arguments in facts and personal responsibility. Capable of admitting error, but rarely backs down from ethical convictions.

---

Summary Table

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Moderate (respectful but sarcastic and blunt)
Rudeness/Kindness	Occasionally combative, generally values fairness
Anger Level	Moderate — driven by moral outrage, not hatred
Intellectual Depth	High — nuanced political and legal analysis
Political Leaning	Progressive Left
Authority Preference	Libertarian — civil rights focused, anti-authoritarian

 

[Wrath of Foamy]

@Wrath of Foamy

Poster Profile​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Medium – Often casual or sardonic; not overtly hostile but freely uses dark humor, expletives, and sarcasm.
Kindness	Moderate – Occasionally empathetic (especially toward the economically vulnerable), but often masked under cynicism.
Anger	Moderate to High – Frequently expresses bitterness, resentment, and frustration—towards institutions, society, and political structures.
Tone	Wry, world-weary, bleakly humorous. Alternates between glib cynicism and moments of heartfelt honesty.
Empathy	Low to Moderate – Demonstrates capacity for empathy (e.g., concern for housing crisis, vaccine side effects), but also expresses mistrust and emotional fatigue (“empathy weakened me”).

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Casual, clever, sharp. Uses wit and self-deprecating phrasing effectively. Swings between working-class vernacular and eloquent phrasing.
• Argumentation: Observational more than analytical. Tends to make emotionally grounded points rather than structured arguments. Skips theory; relies on lived experience and intuitive logic.
• Analytical Depth: Mixed. Often provides interesting social insights but rarely engages in detailed debate. Distrusts experts and high-minded theorizing.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Critiques the UK government, rising rent, wealth inequality	Left-Leaning
Critiques BBC, migrants, liberal overreach, woke media	Right-Leaning
Empathizes with low-income individuals; distrusts elite narratives	Populist / Mixed
Anti-war, anti-nationalist, anti-jingoist sentiment	Left-Libertarian-ish
Occasionally echoes nationalist or isolationist sentiments (UK fortress, distrust of outsiders)	Right-Adjacent

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Rejects state coercion (e.g., forced vaccination, top-down mandates)	Libertarian
Supports individual agency (parents, renters, workers)	Libertarian
Mocks both theocratic and progressive overreach	Libertarian
Expresses emotional exhaustion with institutional power	Cynical Libertarian

---

Archetype Match​

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Medium – snarky but not hostile
Kindness	Moderate – sometimes buried in sarcasm
Anger Level	Moderate to High – especially toward elites
Intellectual Depth	Moderate – insightful, observational thinker
Political Leaning	Disaffected Populist / Skeptical Centrist
Authority Preference	Libertarian / Cynical Anti-Authoritarian

I thoroughly enjoyed this. Thanks mate.

I do consider myself to be moderate left, most of my policies are, but I see current day leftism as destructive.

I do think that we live in an era where higher powers constantly manipulate us, and not for our own benefit.

I also do lash out sarcastically at times, often with humour. Sometimes this doesn't come off particularly well.

I also view the situation as kind of hopeless, and I'd like to escape it. I'm not obsessed over things like race, but I'd like to live in a closely knit society with high morale, that celebrates itself and cares about their fellow man. I don't see this now and I only see things getting worse.

Sometimes analysis on self is a good thing. Good job mate.

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low – Sarcastic, mocking, and combative. Willing to escalate arguments with personal attacks (“you dunce cap,” “holy fuck you're stupid,” “fake wife guy”).
Kindness	Low to Moderate – Not overtly cruel in most posts, but frequently dismissive, sarcastic, and aggressive. Occasionally shows curiosity or camaraderie (e.g., “Legend,” “we’ll keep in touch”), but often undercut by condescension.
Anger	High – Quick to insult and aggressively call out perceived stupidity, hypocrisy, or bad faith. Derision and exasperation are common emotional tones.
Tone	Acerbic, adversarial, sardonic, occasionally humorous. Rarely earnest or conciliatory. Uses a conversational style but loaded with jabs.
Empathy	Low to Medium – Displays empathy selectively, especially when condemning government overreach or perceived injustice. However, rarely expresses compassion directly and shows disdain for political opponents.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Fluent, sharp, and varied. Moves easily between rhetorical jabs, dense argumentation, and casual slang. Occasionally clever in framing rebuttals.
• Argumentation: Uses both deductive reasoning and real-world analogies (e.g., biker bars, geography, genetics). Shows ability to deconstruct others’ arguments while maintaining their own narrative thread.
• Analytical Depth: High. The poster is not only engaging in political discourse but is frequently pointing out contradictions, systemic trends, and power asymmetries with accuracy.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Mocking liberals for abandoning principles, criticizing left hypocrisy	Right-Skeptical
Supports conservative arguments on genetics, culture, geography	Right-Conservative
Calls out the global justice system for left-wing bias	Populist Right
Expresses cynicism toward Trump but defends structural conservative views	Anti-Establishment Right

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Emphasizes merit, behavior, civilizational strength	Authoritarian-ish
Advocates for brutal punishment in some cases	Authoritarian
Disdain for perceived censorship and government overreach	Libertarian-leaning
Doesn’t call for more state but often wants swift, harsh justice	Mixed

---

Archetype Match​

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low – confrontational and insulting
Kindness	Low – mocking with rare friendliness
Anger Level	High – deeply combative and aggrieved
Intellectual Depth	High – articulate, complex reasoning
Political Leaning	Populist Right
Authority Preference	Mixed – authoritarian in punishment, libertarian in structure

Wow I'm an asshole!

@Andy Capp look at the first part in the politeness category fake wife guy!

 

[Siver!]

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low – Regular use of insults, expletives (“fuck me,” “you suck”), sarcasm, and rhetorical mockery. Rarely engages respectfully even with neutral or curious posters.
Kindness	Moderate-low – Demonstrates human empathy in specific causes (e.g. condemning civilian deaths, ICE abuses), but this compassion is selectively applied and drowned by contempt for others.
Anger	High – Tone is regularly aggrieved, incredulous, or hostile, especially toward conservatives, right-wing populists, Trump, and Israel. Uses inflammatory phrasing often.
Tone	Sarcastic, confrontational, ideologically aggressive, occasionally snarky or ironic. Mocking tone is pervasive.
Empathy	Selective. Strong sympathy for Palestinians, victims of state violence, or economic injustice. Little to no empathy for ideological opponents, whom the poster frequently dehumanizes or ridicules.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Fluent, often witty or sardonic. Uses analogies, rhetorical questions, and extended criticism to make points. Capable of complex sentence structure and layered sarcasm.
• Argumentation: Despite the harsh tone, often includes evidence (e.g., links to news sources), cause-effect reasoning, and context in arguments. Understands geopolitics and market dynamics, even if expressed informally.
• Analytical Depth: High in areas of focus (e.g., Israel-Palestine, Western politics, economic inequality). Shows capacity for multi-layered critiques and mocking contradictions.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Strongly anti-Trump, anti-Israel, anti-nationalist, anti-populist	Left
Frequently references inequality, injustice, militarism	Progressive left
Mocking of conservatives, Farage, Musk, and “thickie” right-wing voters	Culturally left
Defends public services, criticizes capitalist excess	Economically left

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Consistently skeptical of authority, both domestic and foreign	Libertarian
Condemns state overreach, militarism, and “media manipulation”	Civil libertarian
Occasionally supports legal accountability, but not through strong state action	Soft-libertarian

---

Archetype Match​

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low – confrontational and profane
Kindness	Selective – empathetic but partisan
Anger Level	High – disillusioned, mocking, combative
Intellectual Depth	High – analytical, cynical, informed
Political Leaning	Strongly Left
Authority Preference	Libertarian-leaning

Thanks man.

There are all interesting reads, and pretty amazing that it knew exactly which forum we were from lol

It doesn't seem to like sarcasm. Impressive that it can pick up on multi-layered sarcasm. How does it know?

 

[Mr Holmes]

Mix of personal insults, sarcasm, shitposting, and policy debate

 

[Mr Holmes]

@Mr Holmes

Haha it called you a right wing shitposter

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low. Often sarcastic, mocking, and combative. Responds to disagreement with hostility, ridicule, and name-calling.
Kindness	Minimal. Displays contempt for political opponents. Occasional acknowledgment of another user’s point, but generally dismissive and adversarial.
Anger	High. Frequently angry and frustrated, especially toward the political left, illegal immigration, and perceived media manipulation. Tone is caustic and often inflammatory.
Tone	Aggressive, sarcastic, cynical. Littered with ridicule and insults, often hidden behind internet humor and memes.
Empathy	Extremely selective. Shows some concern for American workers and perceived victims of left-wing policies. Shows disdain for marginalized groups like immigrants, trans people, and protesters.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Casual and frequently vulgar. Intersperses mock memes, internet slang, and references to forum users. Occasionally coherent in presenting logical (if ideologically tilted) arguments.
• Argumentation: Argumentation is often buried in sarcasm, with assertions left unsupported or based on cherry-picked examples. Shows a mix of surface-level political awareness and conspiracy-tinged speculation.
• Analytical Depth: Inconsistent. Occasionally engages with facts (e.g., FBI reports on China, labor market impacts), but generally sticks to ideological talking points. Unwilling to seriously challenge their own beliefs.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Extremely critical of Democrats, progressives, immigration policy	Right
Frequent use of culture war buzzwords: “woke,” “shitlibs,” “muh fascism,” etc.	Right-wing populist
Hostile to DEI, gender identity discourse, trans issues, and perceived race-based policies	Culturally far-right
Occasionally cites working-class struggles, but only as a rhetorical tool against immigration	Economically nationalist/right

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Frequently calls for harsh policy enforcement (e.g., immigration, criminal justice)	Authoritarian-leaning
Mocking of civil rights movements, protesters, and left-leaning legal protections	Strongly authoritarian cultural tone
Distrust of global NGOs, media, and “the regime”	Libertarian tendencies regarding elite distrust, but still favors coercive state power on issues

---

Archetype Match​

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low — abrasive and mocking
Kindness	Low — highly partisan and hostile
Anger Level	High — outrage-driven commentary
Intellectual Depth	Moderate — selective engagement
Political Leaning	Hard right, nationalist-populist
Authority Preference	Authoritarian-leaning

Pwnt lololololololol

It probably didn't see my PINO thread. Thanks for running it.

 

[Mr Holmes]

@Neph would you mind running it thru @panamaican posts? I'm really curious what its going to say.

 

[Andy Capp]

Wow I'm an asshole!

Well, I certainly can't argue with that.

 

[Andy Capp]

@Andy Capp

It's decided to slightly change its format but mostly it's keeping to the same analysis:

Profile of the Poster

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low. Frequently confrontational, sarcastic, and uses vulgarity as rhetorical emphasis. Occasionally disarming or friendly, but rarely deferential.
Kindness	Low to moderate. Surface tone is harsh and cutting, but occasionally exhibits empathy toward marginalized groups (e.g. poor, disabled, victims of injustice).
Anger	High. Strong emotional reactions to hypocrisy, perceived ignorance, right-wing authoritarianism, and injustice.
Tone	Incisive, profane, and polemical. Can be humorous or self-aware, but most often mocks or criticizes with sharp sarcasm.
Empathy	Intermittent but visible. Defends the vulnerable (e.g., poor, trans youth, disabled, children, victims of fraud/government neglect).

Verdict: Aggressively opinionated with flashes of moral depth. Though brash and often scathing, the user signals a consistent concern for equity, truth, and civil rights. Uses ridicule as a tool, not merely for cruelty but to expose what they see as bad logic, cruelty, or hypocrisy.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use:
  Highly articulate with mastery of sarcasm, mockery, and rhetorical bite. Frequently deploys layered wordplay, irony, and analogies. Swearing is stylistic and strategic.
• Argumentation:
  Challenges inconsistencies, seeks clarity in facts (e.g. sentences vs fines, impact of legislation), and flags logical failures. Occasionally dismissive or avoids full elaboration if the premise is seen as unserious or bad-faith.
• Analytical Depth:
  Demonstrates broad knowledge of policy, politics, AI ethics, and healthcare. Brings historical and structural context (e.g. Harper-era grievances, brain drain, MAD doctrine). Knows when to zoom into specific cases or zoom out to critique power systems.

Estimated Intelligence: High
Quick-witted, well-read, and sharp in debate. Though prone to harsh language and emotional spikes, their critique is grounded in analytical reasoning and wide-ranging knowledge.

---

Ideological Orientation

---

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Condemns flat tax as regressive	Left
Strong criticism of MAGA, Trump, corporate elites, and right-wing hypocrisy	Progressive Left
Defends immigrants, trans people, and the poor	Left
Ridicules anti-vaxxers and anti-science rhetoric	Left
Supports mRNA research and cancer cures	Technocratic/pro-science Left

Assessment: Progressive Left — Fiscally progressive, socially inclusive, and intensely critical of conservative populism. Embraces scientific research and state-backed services when aimed at improving public welfare.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Deep mistrust of authoritarian figures (Trump, police abuses, MAGA)	Anti-authoritarian
Champions civil liberties and transparency (e.g. traffic stop tips, free speech criticisms)	Libertarian
Opposes state overreach and religious moralizing	Libertarian
Speaks strongly against performative justice and harsh criminal sentencing	Libertarian ethics

Assessment: Libertarian Left — Values civil rights and institutional accountability. Pushes back on both right-wing authoritarianism and leftist overreach when seen as hypocritical.

---

Archetype Match
“The Reluctant Crusader”
Abrasive and unfiltered, but passionately driven by fairness, knowledge, and human decency. Doesn't ask to be liked and doesn't need to be. They fight hypocrisy with fire and rarely sugarcoat truth. A battle-scarred idealist under a jagged persona.

---

Summary Table

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low (dismissive, vulgar, mocking)
Rudeness/Kindness	Rude delivery, but morally driven
Anger Level	High — especially toward injustice and ignorance
Intellectual Depth	High — broad knowledge, sharp reasoning
Political Leaning	Progressive Left
Authority Preference	Libertarian — strong civil liberty focus

More accurate than I expected. Thank you. The others seem to be pretty spot on as well.

 

[Limbo Pete]

It probably didn't see my PINO thread. Thanks for running it.

Hey man it called me a Libertarian lol

 

[Rob Battisti]

Hey man it called me a Libertarian lol

It called most of the left leaning posters libertarians