- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 62,047
- Reaction score
- 48,595
Do you disagree that making it easier to build more housing will make housing more affordable?Yeah man. Whatever you say.
Do you disagree that making it easier to build more housing will make housing more affordable?Yeah man. Whatever you say.
I disagree with your entire position.Do you disagree that making it easier to build more housing will make housing more affordable?
Which parts exactly?I disagree with your entire position.
Sure in some respects but not to the extent you do because I believe people should be allowed to build housing by right. There are limits to that even in my view but in a single family neighborhood you should be allowed to build an ADU/ACU or convert a single family home into a multiplex of some kind with minimal red tape.Should we allow communities to self govern?
It's a crude but often effective rhetorical tactic. Appeal to a basic sense of fairness/democracy while disingenuously knowing that system will provide things you're financially, socially, politically etc. aligned with. And the opposition has to then posture against "freedom of choice". That's why you're having trouble nailing him down on a position, while he's trying to make you defensive about yours.Which parts exactly?
Sure in some respects but not to the extent you do because I believe people should be allowed to build housing by right. There are limits to that even in my view but in a single family neighborhood you should be allowed to build an ADU/ACU or convert a single family home into a multiplex of some kind with minimal red tape.
If we're just talking about affordability allowing communities to zone themselves is going to increase prices.Your position: little to no zoning laws.
My position: let the zoning laws be set by the communities themselves.
Well said.It's a crude but often effective rhetorical tactic. Appeal to a basic sense of fairness/democracy while disingenuously knowing that system will provide things you're financially, socially, politically etc. aligned with. And the opposition has to then posture against "freedom of choice". That's why you're having trouble nailing him down on a position, while he's trying to make you defensive about yours.
Well said.
No one would accept this argument, that communities should be allowed to govern themselves, if the question at hand was racial segregation.
You know the argument is weak when they jump right to: "its racist".Forgive me for not wanting to completely eliminate agency for average Americans.
My position is literally how the world currently works. Of course its racistYou know the argument is weak when they jump right to: "its racist".
That's what you're advocating for, that Americans have less agency. I want them to be able to build on their property but you disagree.Forgive me for not wanting to completely eliminate agency for average Americans.
You know the argument is weak when they jump right to: "its racist".
Where did I say Rob is racist? If anything I implied the opposite.My position is literally how the world currently works. Of course its racist
I believe segregation was brought up. I'm not a fan of restrictive zoning laws, but I'm also not a fan of letting developers do whatever they want.That's what you're advocating for, that Americans have less agency. I want them to be able to build on their property but you disagree.
Where did I say Rob is racist? If anything I implied the opposite.
I think if anything the fact that you two dodge the substance of the argument in favor of this kind of deflection.
Yes in this postI believe segregation was brought up.
With the implication being that Rob wouldn't support segregation. How did you twist that in your head to mean the opposite?No one would accept this argument, that communities should be allowed to govern themselves, if the question at hand was racial segregation.
Obviously there should be some limits but people like Rob don't even think you should be allowed to build a granny flat in your backyard or convert a SFH into duplex. That's pretty extreme imo.I'm not a fan of restrictive zoning laws, but I'm also not a fan of letting developers do whatever they want.
Okay, maybe I misunderstood.With the implication being that Rob wouldn't support segregation. How did you twist that in your head to mean the opposite?
Extreme = literally the norm of todays suburban AmericaYes in this post
With the implication being that Rob wouldn't support segregation. How did you twist that in your head to mean the opposite?
Obviously there should be some limits but people like Rob don't even think you should be allowed to build a granny flat in your backyard or convert a SFH into duplex. That's pretty extreme imo.
Which is why we have a housing crisis across the country and why states and cities are passing zoning reform.Extreme = literally the norm of todays suburban America
So normal behavior is extreme? You see how it’s hard to take you seriouslyWhich is why we have a housing crisis across the country and why states and cities are passing zoning reform.
I think it's extreme to limit people's property rights to that extent and it explains why housing is so unaffordable right now.So normal behavior is extreme? You see how it’s hard to take you seriously
and communities have the right to rezone as they see fitI think it's extreme to limit people's property rights to that extent and it explains why housing is so unaffordable right now.
Unless the state decides to upzone which California did in 2021 and which more states are looking into. Better to go over the heads of local NIMBYs and go straight to the state capital for real reform.and communities have the right to rezone as they see fit