Social War Room Lounge Thread #325: PotWR Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.
Limp Bizkit is playing NFL stadiums in 2025. That's something that should unify everyone during these times of political strife.
 
@Crazy Source

🧠 Profile of the Poster

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

CategoryAssessment
PolitenessLow to Moderate. While capable of respectful engagement, this user frequently veers into sarcasm, insults, and direct confrontation.
KindnessSituational. Shows flashes of warmth, humor, and empathy, especially toward allies or in nostalgic reflections—but often laced with contempt or mockery toward ideological opponents.
AngerModerate to High. Frequently irritated by perceived hypocrisy, misinformation, or bad-faith arguments. Tone can become combative or dismissive.
ToneAssertive, sarcastic, often combative. Alternates between lighthearted banter and emotionally charged outbursts. Uses emojis and jokes to mask or enhance bluntness.
EmpathyContextual. Capable of compassion—particularly toward marginalized groups or when sharing personal stories—but quick to ridicule or dehumanize those deemed harmful or ignorant.
Verdict: A passionate and confrontational poster who thrives on conflict and calls out perceived hypocrisy. While aggressive at times, they are not nihilistic—they care deeply about justice, rights, and truth as they see it. Capable of warmth but easily provoked into flamewars.

2. Intelligence Estimation​

  • Language Use:
    Often witty, verbose, and sharp-tongued. Employs references, analogies, quotes, and insults fluidly. Language suggests strong verbal acuity and emotional expressiveness.
  • Argumentation:
    Combines emotional appeal with bursts of logic. May rely more on tone, derision, or pointed contrasts than on careful construction. Can spot hypocrisy quickly, but may substitute mockery for substantiation.
  • Analytical Depth:
    Moderate to High. Aware of political history, media bias, and the mechanics of rights and governance. May exaggerate or generalize for rhetorical effect but shows familiarity with legal and political themes.
Estimated Intelligence: Above Average.
Intellectually sharp and rhetorically agile, though sometimes undermined by emotional reactivity or adversarial framing. Good at dissecting hypocrisy and probing contradictions.
🧭 Ideological Orientation

Left–Right Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Strong disdain for MAGA, authoritarianism, and religious overreachProgressive / Anti-Right
Defends LGBTQ rights, civil liberties, and freedom of speechLeft-libertarian tendencies
Harsh on Democrats for being too soft or centristProgressive frustration
Supports aggressive use of power to check the RightActivist progressive
Assessment: Progressive-Left
Angry at both parties—but primarily at the right-wing shift in politics. Wants Democrats to wield power more boldly. Prioritizes justice, equality, and civil rights. Little patience for centrism masquerading as neutrality.

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Strong support for civil liberties and freedom of speechLibertarian values
Opposes censorship and state-enforced moralityLibertarian
Calls for government accountability but not surveillance or controlCivil libertarian
Angry about overreach from both corporate and government powersAnti-authoritarian impulse
Assessment: Left-Libertarian
Wants the government to be a bulwark for rights, not a regulator of behavior. Staunch defender of personal freedom—especially in speech, art, and bodily autonomy.
🎭 Archetype Match
“The Firebrand Civil Libertarian”
Articulate, passionate, and unrelenting. This poster doesn’t mince words. They demand accountability, freedom, and consistency—and will throw elbows in the rhetorical trenches to get it. While prickly, they are principled and protective of what they see as core rights.
⚖️ Summary Table
TraitAssessment
PolitenessLow–Moderate — sharp-tongued but not devoid of social graces
Rudeness/KindnessOften rude in tone, but capable of empathy
Anger LevelModerate–High — often triggered by perceived injustice
Intellectual DepthAbove Average — sharp with rhetorical and historical knowledge
Political LeaningProgressive Left
Authority PreferenceLibertarian — strong preference for civil rights and decentralization
 
filthybliss said:
@Neph I am curious what the AI would spit out for me. I'm probably a pinch more neo-conish than most on the left.
Click to expand...

🧠 Profile of the Poster

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

CategoryAssessment
PolitenessLow. This poster frequently deploys insults, sarcasm, and derision, even in discussions that begin civilly.
KindnessLow. Shows limited warmth. Humor is sharp-edged and frequently targets others. Occasional levity is often overshadowed by confrontational or dismissive remarks.
AngerHigh. The poster expresses frequent frustration with perceived hypocrisy, extremism, and authoritarianism—particularly from the political right.
ToneAbrasive, sardonic, and confrontational. Leverages ridicule and sarcasm as primary rhetorical tools. Moments of humor or relatability are punctuated with scorn.
EmpathySelective. Shows emotional resonance on issues like LGBTQ rights, free speech, and justice. However, this is often paired with hostility toward perceived bigotry, ignorance, or hypocrisy.
Verdict: A volatile and sharp-tongued poster. They possess moral conviction and occasionally show empathy—but are often driven by contempt for perceived dishonesty, injustice, or political extremism. Even sincere posts are often laced with sarcasm or emotional barbs.

2. Intelligence Estimation​

  • Language Use:
    Informal but verbally nimble. Uses layered sarcasm, cultural references, and political shorthand effectively. Often leans into crass or irreverent phrasing for rhetorical punch.
  • Argumentation:
    Rarely provides structured argumentation, but their responses display an intuitive grasp of hypocrisy and inconsistency in others’ positions. Frequently relies on scorn over sourcing.
  • Analytical Depth:
    Moderate.     Aware of Overton Window shifts, historical comparisons, and systemic political critiques. However, arguments are often emotionally reactive rather than methodically built.
Estimated Intelligence: Moderately High.
Displays strong pattern recognition, cultural awareness, and rhetorical creativity—but emotional intensity and adversarial framing sometimes limit depth or clarity.
🧭 Ideological Orientation

Left–Right Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Aggressive criticism of GOP figures, SCOTUS, and MAGA politicsProgressive/Left
Anger at Democrats for timidity, calls for bolder action (e.g., court packing)Frustrated Progressive
Strong support for LGBTQ+ rights and protest rightsLeft-liberal social values
Deep distrust of performative centrism and right-leaning narrativesProgressive-Left Populism
Assessment: Radical Progressive Left
Believes the political spectrum has shifted dangerously right. Wants forceful correction and direct accountability. Rejects both-sides arguments and sees moderation as complicity.

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Staunch support for free speech and protest rightsLibertarian principles
Anger at executive and judicial overreachAnti-authoritarian
Condemns religious and government over-control of children and civil lifeCivil Libertarian
Opposes censorship, moral policing, and political grandstandingLibertarian ethos
Assessment: Libertarian-Left
Wants government to be transparent and restrained, while aggressively upholding personal freedoms. Defends protest, expression, and rights—even when politically inconvenient.
🎭 Archetype Match
“The Combative Civil Libertarian”
Not here to play nice. This poster is a firebrand who tears into perceived corruption, bad-faith arguments, and authoritarian overreach with biting sarcasm. They defend the Constitution and civil rights—especially when under threat—and aren’t afraid to burn bridges to make their point.
⚖️ Summary Table
TraitAssessment
PolitenessLow — acerbic and combative
Rudeness/KindnessRude, but ideologically principled
Anger LevelHigh — triggered by injustice and hypocrisy
Intellectual DepthModerately high — clever, but emotionally reactive
Political LeaningProgressive Left
Authority PreferenceLibertarian — suspicious of government overreach
 
panamaican said:
That would be a very simplistic assessment of what it said.

1) Opposes authoritarianism, ideological coercion, and moral hypocrisy. <--- if that's left wing, I'm fine with that. I don't think anyone should want to be the opposite. 🤨

2) Advocates civil liberties, economic realism, and evidence-based governance. <--- if that's left wing, I'm fine with that too. I don't think anyone should want to be the opposite. 🤨

3) Expresses nuance about religion, welfare systems, and foreign policy. <--- if that's left wing, I'm fine with that. I don't think anyone should want to be the opposite. 🤨

See, if the claim is that my positions are left-wing then the right wing would be authoritarian, hypocritical, oppositional to civil liberties, economic realism, evidence based-governance and fail to have any nuance on religion, welfare or foreign policy. That's not something anyone should be proud of being.

Here's where you continue to fuck this up. I'm a fiscal conservative, social liberal. Always have been. I'm not a "right-winger" and, these days, I'm not a Republican. The majority of government positions that maximize individual freedoms are "socially liberal". It's where the entire idea of equal rights comes from, the rejection of government as the arbitrator of what people should do in their personal lives.

But this is a nuance that I don't most of you to grasp because I doubt what was written with any sense of understanding.
Click to expand...
Been saying for years I'm baffled you voted conservative, welcome to the dark side..
 
curryjunkie said:
Yes please @Neph , although most of my posts the last few years have been insults😄
Click to expand...

You had a lot of memes that are pictures so it wouldn't get much content from those, but there's still a little bit to go with:

🧠 Profile of the Poster

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

CategoryAssessment
PolitenessVery Low. Posts are consistently vulgar, insulting, and mocking. Personal attacks, slurs, and gleeful ridicule are common.
KindnessExtremely Low. There is no surface warmth, and any humor tends to be cruel or derisive. This poster does not seek understanding — only scorn or mockery.
AngerHigh. The tone is frequently hostile and contemptuous, with anger aimed at political opponents (especially Trump/MAGA supporters), public figures, and other forum users.
ToneCaustic, sardonic, relentless. Dominated by ridicule and abrasive commentary. Sometimes attempts humor, but it’s weaponized or dripping with scorn.
EmpathyMinimal to None. Rare flashes of moral seriousness (e.g., mocking performative outrage, calling out defamation) but largely buried under a mountain of cynicism and verbal aggression.
Verdict: This poster is a scorched-earth operator. Their comments are characterized by aggression, ridicule, and relentless sarcasm. They do not engage in good faith with political adversaries and prefer to dismantle arguments with derision rather than analysis. The poster revels in verbal brutality and social media gladiatorial combat.

2. Intelligence Estimation​

  • Language Use:
    Vulgar but witty. Fluent in online discourse and memes. Uses invective and insult with creative flair, though not always coherently structured.
  • Argumentation:
    Low to Moderate.     Rarely forms structured arguments — instead relies on ridicule, mockery, and assumed consensus. Often makes assertions with sarcastic or flippant tone, which reduces credibility even when content is accurate.
  • Analytical Depth:
    Low to Moderate.     Occasional political insight is buried beneath a style that prizes volume and venom over clarity or depth. Some posts show awareness of international affairs and policy, but these are secondary to tone.
Estimated Intelligence: Moderate.
Culturally literate and rhetorically agile, but intellect is undercut by relentless aggression and a refusal to argue constructively. May be well-informed, but chooses a performative, scorched-earth posture over earnest debate.
🧭 Ideological Orientation

Left–Right Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Constant mockery of Trump, MAGA, and right-wing populistsProgressive Left
Supports trans rights, mocks anti-LGBTQ panic, anti-authoritarian rhetoricLeft-libertarian
References to UK Labour politics, abortion rights, critique of economic populismUK-style social democrat
Hatred for right-wing media and far-right griftersAnti-far-right Left
Assessment: Hard Left (Anti-Fascist, Anti-Populist)
An aggressively progressive worldview, especially on social and cultural issues. Deep hostility to right-wing populism, conspiracy theories, and conservative media figures. Tone suggests not just disagreement with the right, but utter contempt.

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Derides authoritarian tactics and fearmongeringLibertarian-leaning
Strong defense of protest and criticism of state powerAnti-authoritarian
Supports free speech (but within ideological bounds)Inconsistent but left-libertarian tendencies
Deep suspicion of nationalism and militarismLibertarian-progressive mix
Assessment: Libertarian Left
While tone is hostile, the ideological core leans toward civil liberties and distrust of state power. However, the poster is selectively tolerant — civil liberties are valued, but not for those perceived as "the enemy."
🎭 Archetype Match
“The Rabid Satirist”
Brilliant with a blade, but never puts it down. Views politics as a theater of idiocy and sees themselves as the audience heckler with the sharpest tongue. Will sacrifice depth for insult and sees no value in meeting the opposition halfway. Weaponizes wit and mockery to rally the like-minded and demoralize the rest.
⚖️ Summary Table
TraitAssessment
PolitenessVery Low — gleefully insulting
Rudeness/KindnessMaximal rudeness, no interest in kindness
Anger LevelHigh — sarcastic rage toward right-wing figures and ideas
Intellectual DepthModerate — has insight, but prioritizes cruelty over clarity
Political LeaningFar Left / Progressive
Authority PreferenceLibertarian Left — anti-authoritarian, but selectively so
 
Neph said:
I think I'm through the list! If I missed anyone, please @ me.
Click to expand...
You may have missed my earlier request for @Jack V Savage, if you don't mind, please. Mind you, if you saw it but chose to ignore it, no worries.

Crazy Source said:
I am a firebrand civil libertarian with a strong disdain for MAGA. @filthybliss we have similar profiles, but you are more radical and angry.

That was a lot of fun @Neph . Thanks for the legwork, buddy. I owe ya one.
Click to expand...

Indeed, thank you @Neph.
 
Andy Capp said:
You may have missed my earlier request for @Jack V Savage, if you don't mind, please. Mind you, if you saw it but chose to ignore it, no worries.



Indeed, thank you @Neph.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the reminder, I knew I would miss some in there:

🧠 Profile of the Poster

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

CategoryAssessment
PolitenessModerate. The user is often respectful and attempts sincere debate, but frequently slides into passive-aggression or outright condescension when frustrated.
KindnessModerate. Tries to engage civilly, especially at the outset, and avoids dehumanization — but becomes caustic when met with perceived bad-faith or willful ignorance.
AngerLow to Moderate. Most posts reflect frustration rather than fury. Anger builds over time, usually as a reaction to trolling, misrepresentation, or refusal to engage rationally.
ToneMeasured, explanatory, occasionally exasperated. Shifts between earnest persuasion and annoyed rebuttal. Uses sarcasm when pushed, but prefers argument to insult.
EmpathyModerate. Shows consistent concern for fairness, democratic norms, and civil dialogue — even when engaging adversaries. Occasionally slips into derision, but generally humanizes others unless provoked.
Verdict: A cerebral debater with an idealistic streak. Earnestly engages in detailed political discussion and policy reasoning, but becomes abrasive when opponents use bad-faith tactics or resort to name-calling. The poster values rational engagement, but struggles to remain detached in the face of perceived dishonesty or tribalism.

2. Intelligence Estimation​

  • Language Use:
    Exceptionally articulate and well-structured. Demonstrates command of political vocabulary, policy terminology, and rhetorical nuance. Minimal spelling or grammar issues; even when sarcastic, the writing remains coherent.
  • Argumentation:
    High.     Frequently lays out conditional reasoning, contrasts opposing models, and clarifies misinterpretations. Responds directly to counterpoints, attempts to define terms precisely, and distinguishes between normative and descriptive claims.
  • Analytical Depth:
    Very High.     The poster discusses macroeconomic dynamics, partisan coalitions, public opinion data, and political philosophy with fluency. Demonstrates awareness of ideological gradients within parties and the trade-offs involved in policymaking.
Estimated Intelligence: Very High.
The user combines a strong grasp of political theory with policy detail and debate technique. Capable of identifying systemic forces, anticipating objections, and offering nuanced takes across economic, social, and institutional domains.
🧭 Ideological Orientation

Left–Right Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Advocates for progressive policy but critiques the left’s internal purity testsModerate to Progressive Left
Critical of Republican obstructionism and populismLiberal/Center-Left
Values realism in economic policy and electoral strategyCenter-left pragmatist
Defends American liberalism as within normal global left spectrumModerate institutionalist Left
Assessment: Pragmatic Center-Left
The poster sympathizes with progressive aims but prioritizes coalition-building, electoral realism, and institutional reform. Pushes back against both leftist defeatism and right-wing reaction, positioning themselves as a defender of liberal democracy and practical governance.

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Emphasizes democratic process, civil discourse, and good-faith disagreementLibertarian-leaning
Opposes populist strongmen and war-of-plunder rhetoricAnti-authoritarian
Defends liberal norms and checks on executive powerInstitutional libertarianism
Concerned about media, political misinformation, and bad-faith populismCivic-minded, democratic orientation
Assessment: Liberal Libertarian Left
Values civil liberties, due process, and political integrity. Supports public investment and regulatory intervention where justified, but wary of authoritarian tactics from either side of the aisle.
🎭 Archetype Match
“The Rationalist Liberal”
Wants to win hearts and minds with evidence and logic. Believes most people can be reasoned with — at least at first — and tries to rise above tribalism. Deeply values nuance, but shows flashes of moral frustration when others oversimplify or twist the record. May be mocked for earnestness, but persists in pursuit of clarity and truth.
⚖️ Summary Table
TraitAssessment
PolitenessModerate — starts civil, but pushes back hard
Rudeness/KindnessMostly kind, with sharp edges when provoked
Anger LevelModerate — rooted in frustration, not fury
Intellectual DepthVery High — detailed, analytical, principle-driven
Political LeaningPragmatic Center-Left
Authority PreferenceLibertarian-leaning, institutional trust with checks
 
Neph said:
Thanks for the reminder, I knew I would miss some in there:

🧠 Profile of the Poster

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

CategoryAssessment
PolitenessModerate. The user is often respectful and attempts sincere debate, but frequently slides into passive-aggression or outright condescension when frustrated.
KindnessModerate. Tries to engage civilly, especially at the outset, and avoids dehumanization — but becomes caustic when met with perceived bad-faith or willful ignorance.
AngerLow to Moderate. Most posts reflect frustration rather than fury. Anger builds over time, usually as a reaction to trolling, misrepresentation, or refusal to engage rationally.
ToneMeasured, explanatory, occasionally exasperated. Shifts between earnest persuasion and annoyed rebuttal. Uses sarcasm when pushed, but prefers argument to insult.
EmpathyModerate. Shows consistent concern for fairness, democratic norms, and civil dialogue — even when engaging adversaries. Occasionally slips into derision, but generally humanizes others unless provoked.
Verdict: A cerebral debater with an idealistic streak. Earnestly engages in detailed political discussion and policy reasoning, but becomes abrasive when opponents use bad-faith tactics or resort to name-calling. The poster values rational engagement, but struggles to remain detached in the face of perceived dishonesty or tribalism.

2. Intelligence Estimation​

  • Language Use:
    Exceptionally articulate and well-structured. Demonstrates command of political vocabulary, policy terminology, and rhetorical nuance. Minimal spelling or grammar issues; even when sarcastic, the writing remains coherent.
  • Argumentation:
    High.     Frequently lays out conditional reasoning, contrasts opposing models, and clarifies misinterpretations. Responds directly to counterpoints, attempts to define terms precisely, and distinguishes between normative and descriptive claims.
  • Analytical Depth:
    Very High.     The poster discusses macroeconomic dynamics, partisan coalitions, public opinion data, and political philosophy with fluency. Demonstrates awareness of ideological gradients within parties and the trade-offs involved in policymaking.
Estimated Intelligence: Very High.
The user combines a strong grasp of political theory with policy detail and debate technique. Capable of identifying systemic forces, anticipating objections, and offering nuanced takes across economic, social, and institutional domains.
🧭 Ideological Orientation

Left–Right Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Advocates for progressive policy but critiques the left’s internal purity testsModerate to Progressive Left
Critical of Republican obstructionism and populismLiberal/Center-Left
Values realism in economic policy and electoral strategyCenter-left pragmatist
Defends American liberalism as within normal global left spectrumModerate institutionalist Left
Assessment: Pragmatic Center-Left
The poster sympathizes with progressive aims but prioritizes coalition-building, electoral realism, and institutional reform. Pushes back against both leftist defeatism and right-wing reaction, positioning themselves as a defender of liberal democracy and practical governance.

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Emphasizes democratic process, civil discourse, and good-faith disagreementLibertarian-leaning
Opposes populist strongmen and war-of-plunder rhetoricAnti-authoritarian
Defends liberal norms and checks on executive powerInstitutional libertarianism
Concerned about media, political misinformation, and bad-faith populismCivic-minded, democratic orientation
Assessment: Liberal Libertarian Left
Values civil liberties, due process, and political integrity. Supports public investment and regulatory intervention where justified, but wary of authoritarian tactics from either side of the aisle.
🎭 Archetype Match
“The Rationalist Liberal”
Wants to win hearts and minds with evidence and logic. Believes most people can be reasoned with — at least at first — and tries to rise above tribalism. Deeply values nuance, but shows flashes of moral frustration when others oversimplify or twist the record. May be mocked for earnestness, but persists in pursuit of clarity and truth.
⚖️ Summary Table
TraitAssessment
PolitenessModerate — starts civil, but pushes back hard
Rudeness/KindnessMostly kind, with sharp edges when provoked
Anger LevelModerate — rooted in frustration, not fury
Intellectual DepthVery High — detailed, analytical, principle-driven
Political LeaningPragmatic Center-Left
Authority PreferenceLibertarian-leaning, institutional trust with checks
Click to expand...
Should just say “technocrat sophist” and call it a day
 
Neph said:
Thanks for the reminder, I knew I would miss some in there:

🧠 Profile of the Poster

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

CategoryAssessment
PolitenessModerate. The user is often respectful and attempts sincere debate, but frequently slides into passive-aggression or outright condescension when frustrated.
KindnessModerate. Tries to engage civilly, especially at the outset, and avoids dehumanization — but becomes caustic when met with perceived bad-faith or willful ignorance.
AngerLow to Moderate. Most posts reflect frustration rather than fury. Anger builds over time, usually as a reaction to trolling, misrepresentation, or refusal to engage rationally.
ToneMeasured, explanatory, occasionally exasperated. Shifts between earnest persuasion and annoyed rebuttal. Uses sarcasm when pushed, but prefers argument to insult.
EmpathyModerate. Shows consistent concern for fairness, democratic norms, and civil dialogue — even when engaging adversaries. Occasionally slips into derision, but generally humanizes others unless provoked.
Verdict: A cerebral debater with an idealistic streak. Earnestly engages in detailed political discussion and policy reasoning, but becomes abrasive when opponents use bad-faith tactics or resort to name-calling. The poster values rational engagement, but struggles to remain detached in the face of perceived dishonesty or tribalism.

2. Intelligence Estimation​

  • Language Use:
    Exceptionally articulate and well-structured. Demonstrates command of political vocabulary, policy terminology, and rhetorical nuance. Minimal spelling or grammar issues; even when sarcastic, the writing remains coherent.
  • Argumentation:
    High.     Frequently lays out conditional reasoning, contrasts opposing models, and clarifies misinterpretations. Responds directly to counterpoints, attempts to define terms precisely, and distinguishes between normative and descriptive claims.
  • Analytical Depth:
    Very High.     The poster discusses macroeconomic dynamics, partisan coalitions, public opinion data, and political philosophy with fluency. Demonstrates awareness of ideological gradients within parties and the trade-offs involved in policymaking.
Estimated Intelligence: Very High.
The user combines a strong grasp of political theory with policy detail and debate technique. Capable of identifying systemic forces, anticipating objections, and offering nuanced takes across economic, social, and institutional domains.
🧭 Ideological Orientation

Left–Right Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Advocates for progressive policy but critiques the left’s internal purity testsModerate to Progressive Left
Critical of Republican obstructionism and populismLiberal/Center-Left
Values realism in economic policy and electoral strategyCenter-left pragmatist
Defends American liberalism as within normal global left spectrumModerate institutionalist Left
Assessment: Pragmatic Center-Left
The poster sympathizes with progressive aims but prioritizes coalition-building, electoral realism, and institutional reform. Pushes back against both leftist defeatism and right-wing reaction, positioning themselves as a defender of liberal democracy and practical governance.

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Emphasizes democratic process, civil discourse, and good-faith disagreementLibertarian-leaning
Opposes populist strongmen and war-of-plunder rhetoricAnti-authoritarian
Defends liberal norms and checks on executive powerInstitutional libertarianism
Concerned about media, political misinformation, and bad-faith populismCivic-minded, democratic orientation
Assessment: Liberal Libertarian Left
Values civil liberties, due process, and political integrity. Supports public investment and regulatory intervention where justified, but wary of authoritarian tactics from either side of the aisle.
🎭 Archetype Match
“The Rationalist Liberal”
Wants to win hearts and minds with evidence and logic. Believes most people can be reasoned with — at least at first — and tries to rise above tribalism. Deeply values nuance, but shows flashes of moral frustration when others oversimplify or twist the record. May be mocked for earnestness, but persists in pursuit of clarity and truth.
⚖️ Summary Table
TraitAssessment
PolitenessModerate — starts civil, but pushes back hard
Rudeness/KindnessMostly kind, with sharp edges when provoked
Anger LevelModerate — rooted in frustration, not fury
Intellectual DepthVery High — detailed, analytical, principle-driven
Political LeaningPragmatic Center-Left
Authority PreferenceLibertarian-leaning, institutional trust with checks
Click to expand...
Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,953
Messages
58,330,316
Members
176,001
Latest member
batty

Share this page

Back
Top