War Room Awards 2016

[Gandhi]

Still got some fight in him

Are u kidding?

The great lubaschlong can do this all day!!!!!!

 

[Gandhi]

Nope. I don't have it anymore, unless it is stored away on an old hard drive somewhere. Even if I did have it, I wouldn't post it. I only found the other video through a google search of h-mob.

BOOOO

 

[Falsedawn]

I give Fawlty's bludgeoning a perfect 5/7.

 

[Fawlty]

Are u kidding?

The great lubaschlong can do this all day!!!!!!

Yep, he really can. I think the point was made, and there is only limited time needed to expose somebody who is a major league bullshitter (or re-expose, to those who know about his history here). Look, when a dude is claiming that every aspect of everything about his life is extraordinary, it becomes obvious in a hurry. It's not that any one thing is 100% impossible, it's that everything is like 5% probable, thing after thing after thing is highly unusual. It adds up fast. But that's the Luba game.

 

[DoctorTaco]

All my forum irl meet ups having turned out to be great successes.
That's how I met @DoctorTaco's wife, after all.

YOU SON OF A BITCH

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Look, when a dude is claiming that every aspect of everything about his life is extraordinary, it becomes obvious in a hurry. It's not that any one thing is 100% impossible, it's that everything is like 5% probable, thing after thing after thing is highly unusual. It adds up fast.

Remind you of anyone else posting regularly in the WR?

 

[ens189]

@Fawlty might be an elderly homosexual, but he's a pretty solid backtracer.

 

[Thurisaz]

Yes if you are proven wrong and democracy goes your way you will put the guns downs but otherwise it's time for the crazy train.

I'm not a hillary supporter, sorry. You're describing the wrong side.

Also u need to learn to read. I asked you a question, you answered, I called you a pchyco.

Yeah, with false premises to boot. Apparently answering bona fide was a mistake, but that's all right as it's not happening again.

I then said I could hold any number of positions on immigration and come to the same conclusion.

You said you hold the NF stance and that you could be a member, fascist.

I'm not being dishonest, i am sticking to the topic, which is your advocacy for murder as a political solution.

Which incidentally happens to be your strawman and not anything I've said.

 

[Thurisaz]

Wtf are u talking about?

You've falsely claimed repeatedly that I advocate murder. I do not. Not my fellow countrymen's or any other country's men. That's why I am a nationalist and prefer every people having and living in the way they prefer in their own nation and, if need be, defend it from invaders with all their might.

 

[Thurisaz]

"We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children." - @Thurisaz

Well, if you think that we shouldn't secure the existence of our people and a future for white children, you're a racist who obviously hates white people. That would be a problem.

Seems like a stable lad. Too bad his show didn't air on A&E, we could have really gotten to see inside his mind.

I don't know what A&E is, but I'm here. If you have a question, go ahead and ask. Most of my politics can be derived from two facts: 1) I'm a Christian and 2) I'm also Alt Right (more precisely Alt-West).

 

[Thames]

You've falsely claimed repeatedly that I advocate murder. I do not. Not my fellow countrymen's or any other country's men. That's why I am a nationalist and prefer every people having and living in the way they prefer in their own nation and, if need be, defend it from invaders with all their might.

But your definition of self-defense and "invader" is so delusional, that you are in fact advocating for murder.

Since you are crying about being misrepresented here. Let me ask you two very simple questions:

In this thread you called the victims of Breivik for "the future of the corrupt establishment". Setting the repulsiveness of that statement aside, do you support Breivik killing them?

In another thread you seemed very positive towards some "ultra nationalists" having beaten a nigerian refugee to death (simply for existing). Do you support killing non-western refugees (or even non-western immigrants), simply for residing in the "west"?

 

[Thurisaz]

But your definition of self-defense and "invader" is so delusional, that you are in fact advocating for murder.

Were they intent on coming to your home, I'd wager our definitions of "invader" would be the same. I simply extend the concept of home to the whole nation, since I happen to live in a nation state, which is the only place in the world to serve as the home for my people. I have no more right to give it away to foreigners than I have the right to let foreigners to my neighbor's home to rape his wife and daughters.

Different peoples do not mix. Diversity and proximity leads to war. There is historically and practically no difference between an invasion and mass immigration - the results are the same. So yes, I identify an invasion as what it is.

Since you are crying about being misrepresented here.

I represent myself here, no one else does. Many try lying on my behalf.

In this thread you called the victims of Breivik for "the future of the corrupt establishment". Setting the repulsiveness of that statement aside, do you support Breivik killing them?

It's sort of hard to support something that has already been done without my support. But no, as I already said, I prefer less violent means. I'm not sure they prove effective, but when in case shit begins hitting the fan in a major way, I'm not going to be a one man army. One swallow does not a summer make. I still understand that what he did he did for his people and their interests in mind.

In another thread you seemed very positive towards some "ultra nationalists" having beaten a nigerian refugee to death (simply for existing). Do you support killing non-western refugees (or even non-western immigrants), simply for residing in the "west"?

Again, it's entirely possible to achieve the desired result without killing people (unless the invaders put up a fight).

I iterate once again: I don't want this violence I predicted and see happening. I don't approve any of it, even if I understand why it happens and why I also won't condemn it. The people directly responsible for all these crimes, both against nationals and invaders, are the evil, corrupt governments who let them in in the first place. That's what happens with mass migration.

If I wanted violence, mass immigration would be my #1 agenda.

 

[Gandhi]

I'm not a hillary supporter, sorry. You're describing the wrong side.


Yeah, with false premises to boot. Apparently answering bona fide was a mistake, but that's all right as it's not happening again.

You said you hold the NF stance and that you could be a member, fascist.

Which incidentally happens to be your strawman and not anything I've said.

I said even a member of the NF would hold my position that you are crazy. What is the false premise? You can try to catch up with the conversation or continue to hide behind calling me a fascist. Truth is even most modern day far righters would find you to crazy. You want to override the law of the land as enacted through a democratic process and redefine murder as national self defense. And your argument is that democracies are not legit becuase MSM and lack of exposure for some to mass immigration, that and you think you are the better arbiter of right and wrong because derrr democracies =/= right and wrong.

 

[Gandhi]

You've falsely claimed repeatedly that I advocate murder. I do not. Not my fellow countrymen's or any other country's men. That's why I am a nationalist and prefer every people having and living in the way they prefer in their own nation and, if need be, defend it from invaders with all their might.

You have defended it and said you will have to take up arms sooner than you would like. You are not the law, the law defines what murder is, not your twisted sense of racist morality.

 

[Gandhi]

Were they intent on coming to your home, I'd wager our definitions of "invader" would be the same. I simply extend the concept of home to the whole nation, since I happen to live in a nation state, which is the only place in the world to serve as the home for my people. I have no more right to give it away to foreigners than I have the right to let foreigners to my neighbor's home to rape his wife and daughters.

Different peoples do not mix. Diversity and proximity leads to war. There is historically and practically no difference between an invasion and mass immigration - the results are the same. So yes, I identify an invasion as what it is.


I represent myself here, no one else does. Many try lying on my behalf.


It's sort of hard to support something that has already been done without my support. But no, as I already said, I prefer less violent means. I'm not sure they prove effective, but when in case shit begins hitting the fan in a major way, I'm not going to be a one man army. One swallow does not a summer make. I still understand that what he did he did for his people and their interests in mind.


Again, it's entirely possible to achieve the desired result without killing people (unless the invaders put up a fight).

I iterate once again: I don't want this violence I predicted and see happening. I don't approve any of it, even if I understand why it happens and why I also won't condemn it. The people directly responsible for all these crimes, both against nationals and invaders, are the evil, corrupt governments who let them in in the first place. That's what happens with mass migration.

If I wanted violence, mass immigration would be my #1 agenda.

Please answer a simple question. Is the person that beat the Nigerian supposed to go to jail or treated as a hero whose actions should be replicated? If it is not one of these two things, how exactly should be treated/emulated and when? Be specific.

 

[Thurisaz]

I said even a member of the NF would hold my position that you are crazy.

No, you didn't. You claimed I was insane only after admitting you could be a member of NF.

What is the false premise?

That I support murder and insurrection, neither of which I do.

You can try to catch up with the conversation or continue to hide behind calling me a fascist.

It was you who admitted being a fascist, right here:

I could be in the National Front and have the same stance.

I really don't care if you own your words or simply admit you're as careless bumbling idiot when talking about yourself as you are about me.

Truth is even most modern day far righters would find you to crazy.

I've yet to see even one.

You want to override the law of the land as enacted through a democratic process and redefine murder as national self defense.

In few places in the West is the law of the land, excluding Switzerland, enacted through a democratic process. In precisely none of them is the people asked if they want this invasion imposed upon them. Is shooting an intruder in your home "murder"?

And your argument is that democracies are not legit becuase MSM

I said there are lots of people who have no knowledge of the truth of the situation thanks to MSM lying to them all the time and selling them propaganda narrative. That's one of the ways in which the system is corrupt, but it is hardly the only broken thing about it.

and lack of exposure for some to mass immigration, that and you think you are the better arbiter of right and wrong because derrr democracies =/= right and wrong.

I am not the arbiter of right and wrong, you stupid cunt.

 

[Thurisaz]

You have defended it and said you will have to take up arms sooner than you would like.

You have lied time and time again and continue doing so.

You are not the law, the law defines what murder is, not your twisted sense of racist morality.

Murder is a concept much older than current laws concerning it. I don't put much trust in laws that can arbitrarily redefine murder as ok when it targets the most helpless and innocent members of human race.

Right and wrong are no more racist than they change through time.

 

[Thurisaz]

Please answer a simple question. Is the person that beat the Nigerian supposed to go to jail or treated as a hero whose actions should be replicated?

I'm waiting for the simple question.

 

[Gandhi]

I'm waiting for the simple question.

Dodge noted from "above the law" Teresa

 

[Thurisaz]

Dodge noted from "above the law" Teresa

The question was about as complicated as it is possible to get.

Stop lying about what you do and stop lying about me.