What I'm asking is, what are you basing your conclusions about him on? Because everything out there seems to contradict everything else. You've got Janet Reno saying she ok'd the assault because the ATF told her children were being abused. Then you've got the ATF saying they never told her any such thing, and there was no evidence of child abuse. You've got people saying the FBI opened fire first, you've got people saying the Waco people opened fire first. They can't even agree on who started the fires that burned everything. So I ask you, what are you basing your conclusions on?
Btw I'm NOT saying you're wrong about him. Who knows for sure? But I know that the public has never gotten the entire story and likely never will. They've only gotten tainted stories by all sides that are trying to cover their own asses.