
Love this headline.
![]()
Honestly the left picture still looks more masculine to me. Soft features just make men look feminine like those guys in boy bands.
She’s mocking the incels who do this constantly to female characters.Honestly the left picture still looks more masculine to me. Soft features just make men look feminine like those guys in boy bands.
The difference is the older and rugged Joel is still a conventionally attractive male. I'd be drowning in pussy if I looked like him. Can't be said about many of the characters "incels" want to modify.She’s mocking the incels who do this constantly to female characters.
Yeah, Joel's a handsome man, no homo, maybe a little...The difference is the older and rugged Joel is still a conventionally attractive male. I'd be drowning in pussy if I looked like him. Can't be said about many of the characters "incels" want to modify.
Druckman's been averting the male gaze ever since he got pegged by Anita Sarkessian.
![]()
That'll teach you for posting on Reddit!Heh I saw this meme pop up on some Reddit. The poster asked if anyone else hated the trend of “fixing” chicks with mods. I posted “who cares it’s a mod, don’t use it if you don’t like it”. I got downvoted and banned from the subreddit
I don't know why people jumped the gun on that. They are still canon, as Gav Thorpe (author/designer/lore guy at GW) says in tweet in regards to this Femstodies thing.
Timestamped
It makes it look worse for GW who have tried gaslighting everyone with the infamous "there have always been female Custodians". At the height of their popularity, and on the brink of even greater things, this baffles me. No language ever supported female custodians, ever. They could have done something cool to introduce them, but instead they mail it in to cater to a crowd that can never be pleased and likely spends no $$ on their stuff.