Social Viacom terminates Nick Cannon over "anti-semitism"

Black people in Africa can barely keep an economy running on their own without huge cash and expertise infusions from whites or Chinese people. For some reason in the modern world everyone has to humor your delusional behavior...
I dont cosign the crazy relgious talk, but you people that like to shit on Africa love to not mention all the colonizing, plundering and killing that Europe did that helped make it what it is today. De-colonization was happening in the 60s and 70s still.. Apartheid ended in 1994.
This stuff wasnt that long ago.
 
So they fired him for saying something Anti-jewish instead of his anti-white stuff?

I really hope I'm wrong but I get the sense that nobody knows how to handle or deal with this anti-white stuff so they're just labeling it as anti-semetic???
 
When someone starts quoting Farrakhan on race you know what's coming.
It's no secret that Nation of Islam is a black nationalist hate group.
clap.gif
 
I really hope I'm wrong but I get the sense that nobody knows how to handle or deal with this anti-white stuff so they're just labeling it as anti-semetic???
He brought up Farakkhan therefore it's classified as anti-semetic.
 
Iol yeah I get your point. It's impossible to insult me but that might do it. Being Australian we have no constitutional right for " free speech " it's kind of just assumed so I can see it disappearing very quickly. That's why I'm quite interested in watching the shit show in the states at the moment. Which ever way it falls unfortunately will impact here quite a lot.

It's such a new thing ( internet and social media ) that it creates a lot of questions for me. For instance you walking into the funeral saying that id count as provocation and a hiding would be expected. So that would be actually covered in our laws. If you were saying that online? No biggie at all.

I don't know as I said. Got to give it more thought honestly.
Freedom of political commincation is implied in the Constitution per a series of High Court decisions. There are formal protections, it is not merely assumed.

However, there have been decisions limiting polcom freedoms, in particular polcom has been eroded in a HCA decision re public servants.
 
Last edited:
Both his "melanin theory" spiel and the antisemitic conspiracies were straight up repetition of things Farrakhan has said repeatedly. He does say as much in the video in the OP.
I'm noticing NoI has gained a lot of mainstream traction and support in the US. The Breakfast Club has had associates on to preach from time to yime, although the associates tend to leave the more spicy items off t he menu

Lot of black celebs have come out supporting Farrakan as of late following his 4th of July speech: Desaean Jackson, Stephen Jackson, Cannon and Shannon Sharp. Wonder how many black celebs are part of or an ally of the NoI.
 
If he had been less blatant then he probably wouldn't have been fired. One of the things that bothers me here is that they only fired him because of the antisemitism, and not because of the anti-white racism.

And what is going on with him wearing a turban these days. Is he trying to be a 1940s actress?
 
Bold and stupid. I'm glad those American celebrities advertise their bigotry so I can shun them and their movies. I'm not giving them my money.
 
I'm noticing NoI has gained a lot of mainstream traction and support in the US. The Breakfast Club has had associates on to preach from time to yime, although the associates tend to leave the more spicy items off t he menu

Lot of black celebs have come out supporting Farrakan as of late following his 4th of July speech: Desaean Jackson, Stephen Jackson, Cannon and Shannon Sharp. Wonder how many black celebs are part of or an ally of the NoI.

It's ridiculous that straight up racist pseudoscience and religion would be lauded by celebrities just because it "punches up".
Farrakhan, Frances Welsing and Leonard Jeffries are no more respectable than J. Philippe Rushton, Arthur Jensen or Charles Murray.
 
The Bible says we would be taken to a land and enslaved, oppressed, and mistreated for 400 yrs. But at the end of that 400yrs we would wake up and remember who we are. It says the world will bow at our feet and admit who we are. The Bible says at the end of that 400yrs the nations that have oppressed us would fall and suffer great plagues.

According to official history the first Israelite slaves arrived here in 1619. Going by the Hebrew calender the 400yr mark would be either Aug 2019 or March 2020.

Abraham Lincoln was born in a log cabin in Illinois...
 
Wait.. So media said this is anti Semitic because being overtly racist towards white people still isn’t a thing they want to acknowledge exists?


You’re about to get cancelled media/those calling those shots. Be fkn careful.
 
He said white people are savages with a barbaric, conquering mentality that was built up from having less melanin. I personally love this sort of rhetoric, makes me feel real tough. Europeans are the most violent force of nature on earth.

I have to say, if you do a deep dive into the history/archeology of the Indo-European expansion, there may actually be a kernel of truth to his theory (aside from the ridiculous melanin nonsense).
 
  • Like
Reactions: J_C
We have a huge 'cancel white people' pogrom in motion (the latest triggered by something that wasn't even a 'racist assault' ) and TPTB encourage it as much as possible
Blacks are even allowed to talk shit about teh bitches and teh gayz (and other blacks of course)

But the moment they go off reservation...
<seedat>


This has happened repeatedly since at least the 1960s....
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: J_C
There is nothing hateful or bigoted about believing black people are the true Hebrews. Yet thats the narrative being created so that soon people can't even discuss it. I wonder why.

They will let black people say and do anything they want but once they start saying theyre the true hebrews here comes the hammer. I wonder why.


Dispelling falsehoods isn’t a hammer.
 
I dont cosign the crazy relgious talk, but you people that like to shit on Africa love to not mention all the colonizing, plundering and killing that Europe did that helped make it what it is today. De-colonization was happening in the 60s and 70s still.. Apartheid ended in 1994.
This stuff wasnt that long ago.

Oh bullshit, most African countries were left in a far more developed state than they were found in after decolonisation. Better infrastructure, hospitals, trade networks, telecommunications, roads, educational and governmental systems. Hong Kong, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Shanghai, all thriving metropolises, India a growing world power, Ireland a highly tech oriented economy that punches way above it's weight. I'm not defending colonialism in the slightest but to claim that all these countries were left in a smoking wreck after the Brits left is laughable. South Africa had a nuclear program under apartheid, they can barely feed themselves nowadays.

Certain places used the shit the Brits gave the to take it to the next level, others did not. I'll let you connect the dots on the rest.
 
I really hope I'm wrong but I get the sense that nobody knows how to handle or deal with this anti-white stuff so they're just labeling it as anti-semetic???

You're wrong.

His rant was a lot more than just anti-white. It was also specifically anti-semetic. He's been mainlining Farrakhan it seems.
 
Back
Top