- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 1
As some know, I do have some nice "sources" regarding the business end of MMA.
I was away for a month, but since I been back, I been snooping around.
I asked one, why Viacom simulcast Bellator on CMT (as well as TPN) & received an interesting response.
-
I was told that due to Bellator losing money in 2017, that they look at 2018 as a make/break for investing more in Bellator.
With over-all MMA interest down, Bellator did not re-coup their added investment from the last two years of signings & most know the PPV lost millions.
The Paramount Network has gone up in viewership, but sadly Bellator has not.
So they decided to simulcast on CMT to gauge potential reaction.
The last combined broadcast did 400k
Supposedly Coker's HW Tourney is his big attempt at changing the tide.
Also signing Chuck is part of that strategy, but Viacom is being tighter with the checkbook.
They feel that if they could do 75% of the ratings they do on TPN (on CMT) that it is a smarter programming decision
-
The simulcast never made sense to me, until this reply.
Here is some info (for those interested)
In Feb:
Paramount Network was #29 on cable, CMT was #47
FS1 was #41 as a barometer
CMT is in about 7-8m less homes than Paramount, but does less of a % of ratings.
PS:
I wanted to add that Bellator grossed about $20m in 2017 & according to John Nash (& others), they were in the red.
But ...
When the TV station owns the production, creative bookkeeping can be in play.
I don't mean anything scammy, but what money gets put under what umbrella can be tricky.
Ex: Nobody know the exact amount Viacom pays Bellator for broadcast content. They could be under or over paying them to help the bottom-line of Viacom's.
I was away for a month, but since I been back, I been snooping around.
I asked one, why Viacom simulcast Bellator on CMT (as well as TPN) & received an interesting response.
-
I was told that due to Bellator losing money in 2017, that they look at 2018 as a make/break for investing more in Bellator.
With over-all MMA interest down, Bellator did not re-coup their added investment from the last two years of signings & most know the PPV lost millions.
The Paramount Network has gone up in viewership, but sadly Bellator has not.
So they decided to simulcast on CMT to gauge potential reaction.
The last combined broadcast did 400k
Supposedly Coker's HW Tourney is his big attempt at changing the tide.
Also signing Chuck is part of that strategy, but Viacom is being tighter with the checkbook.
They feel that if they could do 75% of the ratings they do on TPN (on CMT) that it is a smarter programming decision
-
The simulcast never made sense to me, until this reply.
Here is some info (for those interested)
In Feb:
Paramount Network was #29 on cable, CMT was #47
FS1 was #41 as a barometer
CMT is in about 7-8m less homes than Paramount, but does less of a % of ratings.
PS:
I wanted to add that Bellator grossed about $20m in 2017 & according to John Nash (& others), they were in the red.
But ...
When the TV station owns the production, creative bookkeeping can be in play.
I don't mean anything scammy, but what money gets put under what umbrella can be tricky.
Ex: Nobody know the exact amount Viacom pays Bellator for broadcast content. They could be under or over paying them to help the bottom-line of Viacom's.