- Joined
- Nov 11, 2018
- Messages
- 1,985
- Reaction score
- 638
You'll never get an objective decision in close fights, (that nobody has problem with it). I think that's pointless endeavor. The judging criteria allows for a lot of wiggle room, and the judges aren't robots, they are humans, they can be swayed by a bias or from where exactly they stand and what they saw... We just better accept it for what it is and move on. If you think a fight is going to be close and going to the scorecard then have it in mind and bet accordingly.I think we should just conclude that betting on a decision outcome is just like flipping a coin. Any fight that is somewhat close can just be awarded to any random fighter. The judging is inconsistent and just horrible. Betting on Mma as a judging sport is just a travesty. They should really find some way to have some sort of objective decision making.