Urine Trouble (Mueller Thread v. 16)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey folks, you may want to pop into the spying thread. The nyt just released a story confirming they planted someone, and that the entire Russia investigation had nothing to do with suspicions about trump, but Flynn had the hots for a Russian chick, Paul Manafort is a dirty sob (who btw the let get close to the campaign, totally dropping the ball once again), Papadopolus said something about Russia having dirt on trump, and carter page being carter page. In fact, they were actually “protecting” Trump.


They’re either lying, or they let the country believe it was a suspected illegal activity by trump, causing massive divisions among its citizens.

Right or left, we should all be very disappointed in the US government.

It looks to me like they presumed the Trump campaign was full of retards that were being actively probed by Russian intelligence agents and were too stupid to realize it so the FBI did their job investigating how bad it was.
 
It looks to me like they presumed the Trump campaign was full of retards that were being actively probed by Russian intelligence agents and were too stupid to realize it so the FBI did their job investigating how bad it was.


So why have they let the media and politicians run with the narrative that this was all started because of suspicions about Trump?

You don’t find anything at all wrong with that?

Wasn’t everyone complaining about influencing our elections?

Yet just now this is being exposed, and that is only because of news breaking there was someone planted in the trump campaign. If that news didn’t break, this lie would have continued.

What about the special elections that already happened? We’re they not effected?

What about the midterms, would they not have been effected?


It’s ironic that after all the accusations the nyt has made, the government runs to them, and forces them to finally print the truth.


I’m runnin out of fuckin popcorn...
 
So why have they let the media and politicians run with the narrative that this was all started because of suspicions about Trump?

You don’t find anything at all wrong with that?

Wasn’t everyone complaining about influencing our elections?

Yet just now this is being exposed, and that is only because of news breaking there was someone planted in the trump campaign. If that news didn’t break, this lie would have continued.

What about the special elections that already happened? We’re they not effected?

What about the midterms, would they not have been effected?


It’s ironic that after all the accusations the nyt has made, the government runs to them, and forces them to finally print the truth.


I’m runnin out of fuckin popcorn...

I'm not sure what you mean it started with suspicions about Trump.

It started with suspicions about the Trump campaign and campaign staff and the question is what did the President know and when did he know it?

It's plainly obvious that Trump's campaign manager was basically a Russian plant. Manafort wasn't just some coffee boy.
 
I'm not sure what you mean it started with suspicions about Trump.

It started with suspicions about the Trump campaign and campaign staff and the question is what did the President know and when did he know it?

It's plainly obvious that Trump's campaign manager was basically a Russian plant. Manafort wasn't just some coffee boy.


Again, why wouldn’t they come out and say that?

Why let the country become so divided?

Why did it take reporting revealing a spy in the campaign, for them to come out and tell the truth.

PS, nbc just named him.





Of course, if you just listened to ole Bob, you’d have known this yesterday...
 
Again, why wouldn’t they come out and say that?

Why let the country become so divided?

Why did it take reporting revealing a spy in the campaign, for them to come out and tell the truth.

PS, nbc just named him.





Of course, if you just listened to ole Bob, you’d have known this yesterday...


I never denied it. I encourage it.

The FBI did the right thing. The Trump campaign was incompetent and the campaign manager was a Russian agent.
 
I never denied it. I encourage it.

The FBI did the right thing. The Trump campaign was incompetent and the campaign manager was a Russian agent.



Here’s the thing that’s messed up. Why even let PM anywhere near a political campaign? Why didn’t they lock the motherfucker up years ago?

Fbi dropping the ball over and over...
 
Here’s the thing that’s messed up. Why even let PM anywhere near a political campaign? Why didn’t they lock the motherfucker up years ago?

Fbi dropping the ball over and over...

If there is one thing we know about you weirdos and your daddy, it's that balls are never being dropped. Give it up, Rudy, it's time for your Razadyne.
 
If there is one thing we know about you weirdos and your daddy, it's that balls are never being dropped. Give it up, Rudy, it's time for your Razadyne.


Hmm, you’d think after I’ve now been proven right, again, you’d stop making an ass out of yourself...
 
Hmm, you’d think after I’ve now been proven right, again, you’d stop making an ass out of yourself...

Yeah, like last week when Trump had given us a first world North Korea. You seem to whinge a lot for someone constantly "winning".
 
Again, why wouldn’t they come out and say that?

Why let the country become so divided?

Why did it take reporting revealing a spy in the campaign, for them to come out and tell the truth.

.


The answer to all three of your questions is: Law enforcement doesn't comment or identify confidential sources and methods. Why the fuck would they? And why the fuck do you refer to confidential sources as "spies." Because Giuliani did?

Christ bob, do you watch To Catch a Predator and feel sorry for the :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile because a "spy" tricked him into coming over?

Unless you can explain why law enforcement wouldn't investigate the trump campaign, or any other campaign, once they had probable cause, you're really just screaming at a wall.
 
The answer to all three of your questions is: Law enforcement doesn't comment or identify confidential sources and methods. Why the fuck would they? And why the fuck do you refer to confidential sources as "spies." Because Giuliani did?

Christ bob, do you watch To Catch a Predator and feel sorry for the :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile because a "spy" tricked him into coming over?

Unless you can explain why law enforcement wouldn't investigate the trump campaign, or any other campaign, once they had probable cause, you're really just screaming at a wall.


Why not just investigate the individuals?

What did any of the accusations have to do with Trump ?
 
So why have they let the media and politicians run with the narrative that this was all started because of suspicions about Trump?
.
Who has ever said it started because of suspicions about Trump? It started because of Papadope and comrade Manafort. Trump wasn't targeted until he told everyone he fired Comey to take pressure off the investigation.
 
Who has ever said it started because of suspicions about Trump? It started because of Papadope and comrade Manafort. Trump wasn't targeted until he told everyone he fired Comey to take pressure off the investigation.


Except it’s looking like Papadopolus talking was not the impetus. Not confirmed, but reports are beginning to come out.
 
This isn’t the first time Halper has been a spy in a political campaign.




Four decades ago, Halper was responsible for a long-forgotten spying scandal involving the 1980 election, in which the Reagan campaign – using CIA operatives managed by Halper, reportedly under the direction of former CIA Director and then-Vice-Presidential candidate George H.W. Bush – got caught running a spying operation from inside the Carter administration that involved passing classified information about Carter’s foreign policy to Reagan campaign officials in order to ensure the Reagan campaigned knew of any foreign policy decisions that Carter was considering.

: Stefan Halper. And Halper’s history is quite troubling, particularly his central role in the scandal in the 1980 election. Equally troubling are the DOJ and FBI’s highly inflammatory and, at best, misleading claims that they made to try to prevent Halper’s identity from being reported.

To begin with, it’s obviously notable that the person the FBI used to monitor the Trump campaign is the same person who worked as a CIA operative running that 1980 Presidential election spying campaign, one that involved passing classified information about the Carter administration’s most sensitive secrets to the Reagan campaign.

It was not until several years after Reagan’s victory over Carter did this scandal emerge. It leaked by right-wing officials inside the Reagan administration who wanted to undermine officials they regarded as too moderate, including then White House Chief of Staff James Baker, who was a Bush loyalist.

The NYT in 1983 said the Reagan campaign spying operation “involved a number of retired Central Intelligence Agency officials and was highly secretive.” The article, by then NYT reporter Leslie Gelb, added that its “sources identified Stefan A. Halper, a campaign aide involved in providing 24-hour news updates and policy ideas to the traveling Reagan party, as the person in charge.” Halper, 73, had also worked with Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, and Alexander Haig as part of the Nixon administration.

When the scandal first broke in 1983, the UPI suggested that Halper’s handler for this operation was Reagan’s Vice Presidential candidate, George H.W. Bush, who had been the CIA Director and worked there with Halper’s father-in-law, former CIA Deputy Director Ray Cline, who worked on Bush’s 1980 presidential campaign before Bush ultimately became Reagan’s Vice President. It quoted a former Reagan campaign official as blaming the leak on “conservatives are trying to manipulate the Jimmy Carter papers controversy to force the ouster of White House Chief of Staff James Baker.”



Halper, through his CIA work, has extensive ties to the Bush family. Few remember that the CIA’s perceived meddling in the 1980 – its open support for its former Director, George H.W. Bush to become President – was a somewhat serious political controversy. And Halper was in that middle of that, too.


So as it turns out, the informant used by the FBI in 2016 to gather information on the Trump campaign was not some previously unknown, top-secret asset whose exposure as an operative could jeopardize lives. Quite the contrary: his decades of work for the CIA – including his role in a obviously unethical spying operation during the 1980 presidential campaign – is quite publicly known.
 
Basically Bob is arguing Trump and associates should get off on a technicality, I have a feeling he takes the opposite view on every other type of criminal case.
 
Still predicting lots of pawns will fall when the smoke clears but Trump will escape the consequences. AGAIN.
 
Basically Bob is arguing Trump and associates should get off on a technicality, I have a feeling he takes the opposite view on every other type of criminal case.


Please find where I’ve stated a single time the investigation should be called off because of what I’m posting. I’ll wait right here...


I’m simply posting news. That news exposes a lot of wrongdoing, sorry it that rustles your jimmies.
 
Please find where I’ve stated a single time the investigation should be called off because of what I’m posting. I’ll wait right here...


I’m simply posting news. That news exposes a lot of wrongdoing, sorry it that rustles your jimmies.
Ok, then wait for investigation to be finished.
 
The answer to all three of your questions is: Law enforcement doesn't comment or identify confidential sources and methods. Why the fuck would they? And why the fuck do you refer to confidential sources as "spies." Because Giuliani did?

Christ bob, do you watch To Catch a Predator and feel sorry for the :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile because a "spy" tricked him into coming over?

Unless you can explain why law enforcement wouldn't investigate the trump campaign, or any other campaign, once they had probable cause, you're really just screaming at a wall.
<36>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top