• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Uneducated journalist is at it again...

DenverBJJ

White Belt
@White
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
144
Reaction score
0
Last edited:
I think "Uneducated" and "Journalist" kind of go hand in hand.
 
Couldn't make it through the whole thing, felt like I was reading something from The Onion.
 
putting savage in the article title, attracting kids to his views.
 
That kid that fought Ben Rothwell probably moved to NY and became a journalist.
 
He's trying to piss off the one true God.

ZaFDxK.gif
 
You guys know he's just a "shock" journalist?
phil-mushnik-ny-post-racist-writer.jpg

"“As long as the Nets are allowing Jay-Z to call their marketing shots— what a shock that he chose black and white as the new team colors to stress, as the Nets explained, their new ‘urban’ home— why not have him apply the full Jay-Z treatment? Why the Brooklyn Nets when they can be the New York Ni..."
-Phil Mushnick
I'm not going to post the rest of the quote, cuz i don't want to get banned.

Also, it's the Post... trashy
 
Journalists are pussies who think they should get to talk shit and not face the consequences.
 
This mma ghey pron doesn't have the right ending.
 
"Uneducated"? Not at all. MMA is a violent sport that can be very traumatic on the brain. And it is conceivable that the vote to legalize MMA in NY was affected by perceptions of the economics. His is a perfectly valid opinion, I disagree with him.
 
lucky that dumbfuck's opinion doesn't really matter because the vote is already passed.
 
I think calling him uneducated is a bit of a stretch because it sounds like a blanket statement. And moreso he may not even be ignorant of the issues surrounding MMA legalization, as he brings up old but common arguments against it.

That said, he is most certainly extremely biased and anti-mma. If his goal was to change minds of people that are already familiar with the arguments for and against MMA he's not making a good case. All he is accomplishing is framing the discussion in a negative light with rhetorical tactics like calling it cage fighting instead of MMA. Nobody calls it cage fighting anymore.

If you can't make your argument while unbiasedly presenting the facts of both sides then you are most likely on the losing side--something I think that is evident in the fact that there is nobody even arguing the counter point anymore.
 
"Uneducated"? Not at all. MMA is a violent sport that can be very traumatic on the brain. And it is conceivable that the vote to legalize MMA in NY was affected by perceptions of the economics. His is a perfectly valid opinion, I disagree with him.
Would you want your state to be the only state in the country to have this sport be banned?
 
Back
Top