Understanding WHY Whittaker won. Also what he didnt do & couldve done to dominate. Full analysis.

PROlogic

Banned
Banned
Joined
Nov 5, 2017
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
0
This covers most of everthing from both fights, so naturally it's going to be a bit long. I hope you stick around and read it all. This deserves actual discussion, and not just the usual trolling/one liners "robbery." Enjoy : )

First 2 rounds were a pure out-classing by Whittaker. Lets understand why:

-Whittaker constantly kept him off set with the jab

-Every time Romero stepped in to strike or lunge, he would simply interrupt Romero with the jab

-When Romero was in a high guard planted and waiting to "explode" Whittaker simply controlled his range and picked him off with jabs, side kicks, upkicks etc

-This all kept Romero continually pre-occupied and unable to close distance and "explode" when he wanted to

Whiattker landed huge strikes off this too, like that High kick etc. Romero just has a granite chin

Whittaker busted Romero's eye socket with dominating solid jab work


However, here's where the hand injury hurt Whittaker.....

-IF Whittaker wouldve been able to use his right hand (or can use it next time) he can follow up his jabs with 1-2s (and really make Romero hesitant to "explode") While just staying defensively responsible of any return fire. Then he can shut Romero out

But even though Whittaker only had one hand, he still couldve dominated tonight


Here are things Whittaker couldve done and should've done...

-Jab, fient, jab, control, jab-left hook combos.

-Double up on the jab more often. Mix it up.

-Change up the speed of his jabs.

He needs to study Conor McGregor on how to be a sophisticated jabber who makes it near impossible to counter

Conor changes up the speeds of his jabs, shoots his jab from all kinds of positions - from down low, upright or straight on, while constantly mixing up his jabs with fients, touch jabs, bait jabs, double ups etc. Conor is nearly impossible to read/time in everything he does


-Whittaker should have also touched up high with bait jabs, then went hard to the body off the misdirections (like Conor does. As shown here)
2v81x6p.gif




Romero was in a high guard where his body was open

That's the biggest mistake I feel Whittaker made (that and not left hooking off his jab work, instead of his left hook just being exclusively a dip and counter response to Romero's strikes). He shouldve been going to Romero's body ruthlessly. Gas Romero out then pick him off to the head

-Off that established body work, fient the body to drop Romero's guard and strike up top etc

So many fighters neglect the body. It pisses me off.

Conor is literally the only MMA fighter who consistently does great body work. That's part of being an actual educated boxer. Going to the body. That's another of many reasons why Conor>>>>everyone in MMA


Now here is WHY Whittaker had much more success in the first fight

- the teep kick

Whitaker kept teep kicking Romero to the gut.

-This not only kept Romero at bay and shut down his ability to "explode,"

-While allowing Whittaker to close distance behind his teep kicks/misdirect to set up punches behind his teep kicks

-But it gassed Romero out quick and hard

It was Whittaker who switched gameplans, and was much less successful because of it, dropping the teep kick to the gut from the first fight, which was not only insanely effective against Romero at keeping him at bay, but was also a fantastic misdirection tool in allowing Whittaker to close distance more easily and land punches and combos behind his step in teep kicks

I mean Romero even made it easier for Whittaker to tear up his insides with teep kicks by standing in a high guard in front of Whittaker

Whittaker had a lapse in gameplan by dropping the teep kick of the first fight, but he still won the rematch.

And there were many signs that showed that if Whittaker had done this here or that there (been more educated, more unpredictable, and defensively responsible) he could've still dominated Romero tonight

But I'm confident Whittaker at 100% has more success with what he has already had great success with and beats Romero with complete ease

What won the fight for Whittaker tonight was his variety of work, consistent work of continually damaging Romero, and jab work, and all though his jab work was fairly predictable compared to a sophisticated jabber like Floyd/Conor, it worked most of the time vs Romero because Romero is not an educated striker.

Tonight was the best Romero could ever hope to do against Whittaker, where as Whittaker just needs to make little corrections and adjustments here and there amd he dominates. Romero is never coming close to Whittaker again. Both his "gameplans" have already failed vs Whittaker.
 
Last edited:
Not reading all that.

Yoel had homie breakdancing on Bambi legs multiple times and whooped that ass.

Nuff said.
 
Not reading all that..
That's your right. Just don't post in threads you don't want to read. If you don't want to be educated, that's on you. That's fine.

I will be nice and try my best to do a TLDR version for you though

- Jab work from Whittaker had Romero continually off set

- Whittaker landed the big shots more often. Romero's single strikes were more devastating but you don't win fights via fighting in spurts

- Romero standing in a high guard had his body completely exposed. Whittaker made a huge mistake not going to the body ruthlessly

- The teep kick was his most effective weapon against Romero (from the first fight) For some odd reason he completely dropped it for the rematch and was less successful because of it

- Not having his right hand def hurt him, but there are still things he could've done (all of which I detail)


- In the end Whittaker still won and Romero will never get close again to Whittaker. Both his gameplans have already failed
 
Whittaker may have won the decision, but we ALL know that it was a bogus decision.

If we scored fights properly rounds 3 and 5 are clearly weighted more than 1, 2 and 4.
 
Last edited:
Not reading all that.

Yoel had homie breakdancing on Bambi legs multiple times and whooped that ass.

Nuff said.

Yoel looked like an asian guy after the fight.

And of course many of you will not read that, because it implies a lot of analysis.
 
Can’t agree with your conclusions. That fight was draw on points. That’s what I saw, twice.
 
This covers most of everthing from both fights, so naturally it's going to be a bit long. I hope you stick around and read it all. This deserves actual discussion, and not just the usual trolling/one liners "robbery." Enjoy : )

First 2 rounds were a pure out-classing by Whittaker. Lets understand why:

-Whittaker constantly kept him off set with the jab

-Every time Romero stepped in to strike or lunge, he would simply interrupt Romero with the jab

-When Romero was in a high guard planted and waiting to "explode" Whittaker simply controlled his range and picked him off with jabs, side kicks, upkicks etc

-This all kept Romero continually pre-occupied and unable to close distance and "explode" when he wanted to

Whiattker landed huge strikes off this too, like that High kick etc. Romero just has a granite chin

Whittaker busted Romero's eye socket with dominating solid jab work


However, here's where the hand injury hurt Whittaker.....

-IF Whittaker wouldve been able to use his right hand (or can use it next time) he can follow up his jabs with 1-2s (and really make Romero hesitant to "explode") While just staying defensively responsible of any return fire. Then he can shut Romero out

But even though Whittaker only had one hand, he still couldve dominated tonight


Here are things Whittaker couldve done and should've done...

-Jab, fient, jab, control, jab-left hook combos.

-Double up on the jab more often. Mix it up.

-Change up the speed of his jabs.

He needs to study Conor McGregor on how to be a sophisticated jabber who makes it near impossible to counter

Conor changes up the speeds of his jabs, shoots his jab from all kinds of positions - from down low, upright or straight on, while constantly mixing up his jabs with fients, touch jabs, bait jabs, double ups etc. Conor is nearly impossible to read/time in everything he does


-Whittaker should have also touched up high with bait jabs, then went hard to the body off the misdirections (like Conor does. As shown here)
2v81x6p.gif




Romero was in a high guard where his body was open

That's the biggest mistake I feel Whittaker made (that and not left hooking off his jab work, instead of his left hook just being exclusively a dip and counter response to Romero's strikes). He shouldve been going to Romero's body ruthlessly. Gas Romero out then pick him off to the head

-Off that established body work, fient the body to drop Romero's guard and strike up top etc

So many fighters neglect the body. It pisses me off.

Conor is literally the only MMA fighter who consistently does great body work. That's part of being an actual educated boxer. Going to the body. That's another of many reasons why Conor>>>>everyone in MMA


Now here is WHY Whittaker had much more success in the first fight

- the teep kick

Whitaker kept teep kicking Romero to the gut.

-This not only kept Romero at bay and shut down his ability to "explode,"

-While allowing Whittaker to close distance behind his teep kicks/misdirect to set up punches behind his teep kicks

-But it gassed Romero out quick and hard

It was Whittaker who switched gameplans, and was much less successful because of it, dropping the teep kick to the gut from the first fight, which was not only insanely effective against Romero at keeping him at bay, but was also a fantastic misdirection tool in allowing Whittaker to close distance more easily and land punches and combos behind his step in teep kicks

I mean Romero even made it easier for Whittaker to tear up his insides with teep kicks by standing in a high guard in front of Whittaker

Whittaker had a lapse in gameplan by dropping the teep kick of the first fight, but he still won the rematch.

And there were many signs that showed that if Whittaker had done this here or that there (been more educated, more unpredictable, and defensively responsible) he could've still dominated Romero tonight

But I'm confident Whittaker at 100% has more success with what he has already had great success with and beats Romero with complete ease

What won the fight for Whittaker tonight was his variety of work, consistent work of continually damaging Romero, and jab work, and all though his jab work was fairly predictable compared to a sophisticated jabber like Floyd/Conor, it worked most of the time vs Romero because Romero is not an educated striker.

Tonight was the best Romero could ever hope to do against Whittaker, where as Whittaker just needs to make little corrections and adjustments here and there amd he dominates. Romero is never coming close to Whittaker again. Both his "gameplans" have already failed vs Whittaker.
Honestly. I was liking it. And had all intent of reading all of it and responding. Until I read “he needs to learn from Conor McGregor” lol. Bye.
 
Honestly. I was liking it. And had all intent of reading all of it and responding. Until I read “he needs to learn from Conor McGregor” lol. Bye.

Agreed 100%.

A guy who fought ALL the monsters at MW while nobody wanted to do that, vs a guy who runs aways and picks fights...Conor is a great fighter, but he's never faced repeatedly same level of competition as Whitaker.

If anything, I think Conor should probably study Whitaker...he actually defends belts. Conor will never face a guy like Romero. Romero is like Khabib on Steroids (not actual Steroids, just way of saying it...no pun intended).
 
Agreed 100%.

A guy who fought ALL the monsters at MW while nobody wanted to do that, vs a guy who runs aways and picks fights...Conor is a great fighter, but he's never faced repeatedly same level of competition as Whitaker.

If anything, I think Conor should probably study Whitaker...he actually defends belts. Conor will never face a guy like Romero. Romero is like Khabib on Steroids (not actual Steroids, just way of saying it...no pun intended).
Conor doesn’t have an especially great jab either. Whitaker has a better jab than him. And if you study anyone on the jab, study GSP.

Conor is a great and dangerous striker, but he doesn’t use a lot of variation and relies heavily on a few forms of his left hand shots. Also, after 2 rounds he’s proved to be useless striking. While Whitaker is a much more well rounded and durable striker.


And yeah, but he may be on actual steroids too. That guy’s body is sculpted out of stone lol. He’s gotta be in something. Jesus.
 
? Pretty sure Nate landed more punches to the body than Conor did.
 
Since when does Conor actually utilize a jab? Just because someone throws a strike with their lead hand doesn't automatically make it a jab.

Look at GSP or Mousasi to see how to utilize a jab in MMA.

Conor is a karate stylist that transformed to a boxer somewhere between the Aldo and Alvarez fights.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top