- Joined
- Jun 10, 2016
- Messages
- 28,979
- Reaction score
- 18,859
There needn’t be a similarity. You piss Dana off and you incur his wrath. There is a similarity in Ariel and josh gross. I’m not disingenuous so I’m not trying to hide it. Both of them released spoilers that pissed Dana off. Gross pissed me off because he blurted out the winner of TUF during his radio show and ruined it for me. Ariel put the Brock Lesnar story out before they wanted it released. They were banned. But you don’t have to be banned to suffer the consequences. Dana can just ice you out and leave you out in the cold. There are 4 or 5 journalists on this list. Not all of them were publicly/officially banned but they sure as hell dealt with the consequences of pissing Dana off. https://bleacherreport.com/articles...ho-have-enraged-the-volatile-ufc-chief#slide0
Here is my opinion, agree with or not, I’m done with it after this. The reporter basically apologized for asking the question before he asked it. He’s a writer for the New York Times, and I feel like he didn’t even want to ask the question just from the way he apologized. So I think he either was asked to by his boss or he felt it was his duty to do so. He was probably there to enjoy fight week and have a good time on a sweet assignment. If you want to ascribe all these negative, ulterior motives, I disagree.
So there isn't one, basically