Tournaments dont always tell us who the best fighter is. It comes down to durability and luck alot of the time. More than once we seen someone who already lost,win the thingAs much as I like watching the PFL, I hate when a loser can proceed on because the person who beat them is too compromised to continue. I don't want that in the UFC.
conor and khabib aint fighting more than once a night for 5 milDana should put up like 5 million and then we'd see who really believe they're the best and who ducks live competition.
Then have alternates fighting in bouts and winner of that fight can jump in if someone can't continue.As much as I like watching the PFL, I hate when a loser can proceed on because the person who beat them is too compromised to continue. I don't want that in the UFC.
tournaments can be very advantageous for manipulation if you control the brackets as pride didDana's terrified of tournaments...they don't allow him to manipulate things as easily.
But we get that now. Gus vs Cormier happened after Gus lost to rumble.As much as I like watching the PFL, I hate when a loser can proceed on because the person who beat them is too compromised to continue. I don't want that in the UFC.
You can say the same for any sport. In the NBA or NFL etc. there are teams who've beaten the champion of that year.Tournaments dont always tell us who the best fighter is. It comes down to durability and luck alot of the time. More than once we seen someone who already lost,win the thing
Please lets not compare fight sports to ball games. Its not even remotley the same.You can say the same for any sport. In the NBA or NFL etc. there are teams who've beaten the champion of that year.
Yes,so no need to do a tourney then since we dont learn much from it anywayBut we get that now. Gus vs Cormier happened after Gus lost to rumble.
Yoel vs Izzy
Iaquinta vs Khabib
And countless others happened due to injury and in some cases with a fighter coming off a loss.
I don't see the need for a tournament these days, there's nothing you can get from one that you can't get from matchmaking.Yes,so no need to do a tourney then since we dont learn much from it anyway
Exactly it made more sense back then because there were less fighters and more disorganization. Also UFC didnt have the monopoly they do nowI don't see the need for a tournament these days, there's nothing you can get from one that you can't get from matchmaking.
So why is it so bad that the winner of a tournament has lost to someone in the tournament? Luck plays a role in MMA.Please lets not compare fight sports to ball games. Its not even remotley the same.
No incentive for the fighters to do something that doesnt show who the best is anymore. No money to afford the best fighters to compete in it.So why is it so bad that the winner of a tournament has lost to someone in the tournament? Luck plays a role in MMA.
The tournament isn't to find out who's the best. We all know that fighters can have good and bad days. Cain - JDS, Conor - Nate etc.
Good point. But maybe they could be useful for unranked fighters, to see who moves up. TUF is essentially a tournament.As much as I like watching the PFL, I hate when a loser can proceed on because the person who beat them is too compromised to continue. I don't want that in the UFC.
it isGood point. But maybe they could be useful for unranked fighters, to see who moves up. TUF is essentially a tournament.
It's an entertainment sport anyway. Tournaments are entertaining. Pride had tournaments and regular champions, it didn't detract from anything.No incentive for the fighters to do something that doesnt show who the best is anymore. No money to afford the best fighters to compete in it.
Yes but thats the trick. The money would be too big to have anyone worthy to participate.It's an entertainment sport anyway. Tournaments are entertaining. Pride had tournaments and regular champions, it didn't detract from anything.
Incentive for winning the tournament should be prestige and a big fucking sum of money.