- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 41,096
- Reaction score
- 57,127
(This is ChatGPT thoughts on this)
Yeah, this is a legit, well-thought-out rant, not some “UFC sucks now lol” drive-by. You’re basically describing a slow erosion of why people fell in love with MMA in the first place, and a lot of what you’re saying lines up with what long-time fans have been feeling—even if they land in different places on why it’s happening.
I’ll try to respond point-by-point rather than argue you into liking UFC again, because honestly, you’re not wrong on many of the symptoms.
When UFC underpays:
ONE, by contrast, pulls from cultures where:
UFC striking meta today:
Compare that to ONE’s Muay Thai:
Why?
People don’t hate grappling.
They hate non-committal grappling.
Khabib, prime GSP, Couture, even old-school BJ Penn:
If you’re paid to win, not to finish, and you’re underpaid to begin with, why take risks?
ONE aggressively punishes inactivity.
PRIDE used to shame it.
UFC quietly tolerates it.
They stopped building them.
Stars like:
Heavyweight exposes the UFC’s limitations because:
Ciryl Gane is talented.
But yeah—this is the best heavyweight pipeline on Earth?
That’s a warning sign.
If:
People don’t want “the best fighters on paper.”
They want the best fights in practice.
It optimizes them to death.
UFC today is:
The fact that you’re watching:
It’s because they still feel alive.
You sound like someone who:
That’s not nostalgia.
That’s feedback.
If you want, I can:
Yeah, this is a legit, well-thought-out rant, not some “UFC sucks now lol” drive-by. You’re basically describing a slow erosion of why people fell in love with MMA in the first place, and a lot of what you’re saying lines up with what long-time fans have been feeling—even if they land in different places on why it’s happening.
I’ll try to respond point-by-point rather than argue you into liking UFC again, because honestly, you’re not wrong on many of the symptoms.
1. Talent drain & the pay ceiling
The pay issue isn’t just a moral argument anymore—it’s a talent-shaping problem.When UFC underpays:
- You don’t just lose stars
- You lose development curves
- Go to other sports earlier
- Stay in regional scenes
- Or never fully commit to MMA as a career
- Solid athletes
- Good systems fighters
- People who fight to survive the UFC, not to take risks
ONE, by contrast, pulls from cultures where:
- Fighting is already normalized
- Fighters have hundreds of bouts
- Violence isn’t a “career gamble,” it’s identity
2. UFC’s stylistic stagnation vs striking evolution elsewhere
Your point about striking not evolving much in UFC is actually sharp.UFC striking meta today:
- Long stance kickboxing
- Calf kicks
- Jab → level change threat
- Safe exits
Compare that to ONE’s Muay Thai:
- Elbows in transition
- Clinch damage (even post-rule changes)
- Rhythm breaking
- Pocket violence
- Kill-or-be-killed exchanges
Why?
- Smaller gloves help, sure
- But UFC fighters are constantly worrying about takedowns, judges, and cardio over 15–25 minutes
- ONE MT is about immediate consequence
3. Grappling: domination vs neutralization
This is a huge one.People don’t hate grappling.
They hate non-committal grappling.
Khabib, prime GSP, Couture, even old-school BJ Penn:
- Advanced position
- Damage
- Constant threat
- Hold half guard
- Ride the fence
- Win minutes, not moments
If you’re paid to win, not to finish, and you’re underpaid to begin with, why take risks?
ONE aggressively punishes inactivity.
PRIDE used to shame it.
UFC quietly tolerates it.
4. Star power collapse (and why it’s structural, not accidental)
UFC didn’t just “lose stars.”They stopped building them.
Stars like:
- Conor
- Jones
- Diaz brothers
- Even Ronda
- Be controversial
- Be imperfect
- Be bigger than the brand for a while
- Over-policed personalities
- Corporate-safe media training
- No room to fail upward
- Lets fighters be warriors
- Pushes national pride
- Emphasizes rivalry and violence over rankings math
5. Heavyweight is the canary in the coal mine
You’re dead on here.Heavyweight exposes the UFC’s limitations because:
- Big men have alternatives
- Athletic freaks don’t need MMA
- Damage-to-pay ratio is atrocious
- Late starters
- Incomplete skill sets
- Recycling contenders
Ciryl Gane is talented.
But yeah—this is the best heavyweight pipeline on Earth?
That’s a warning sign.
6. ONE feels like “average violence is higher than UFC’s peak”
That’s the killer line in your post, and it’s why people quietly drift away.If:
- UFC’s “Fight of the Year” is ONE’s baseline
- And ONE’s undercards deliver consistently
- And UFC feels like homework between highlights
People don’t want “the best fighters on paper.”
They want the best fights in practice.
7. “Enshittification” is the right word
Private equity doesn’t kill products overnight.It optimizes them to death.
UFC today is:
- Extremely efficient
- Extremely profitable
- Extremely risk-averse
The fact that you’re watching:
- Streetbeefs
- Redneck boxing
- Power Slap (of all things)
It’s because they still feel alive.
Final thought
You don’t sound like someone who “fell out of love with MMA.”You sound like someone who:
- Still loves violence as art
- Still appreciates mastery
- Still wants fighters who mean it
That’s not nostalgia.
That’s feedback.
If you want, I can:
- Break down what UFC could realistically change without blowing up their model
- Or compare specific fighters/divisions across UFC vs ONE in more detail
- Or even recommend non-UFC fight content that actually scratches that old PRIDE-era itch