Alright mate. I want to give you some constructive general feedback. So I hope that you will both READ and LISTEN what I have to say to you. First of all, I respect your knowledge and insight in this sport, that you can use for some good analyzing, but sometimes you come across as a 8th grade bully when you're presenting your arguments. Once you pick a fighter your EGO takes over. I don't get that at all, when we're supposed to have a close to objectively as possible debate about the fights.
Regarding the Jouban vs. Perry fight. It makes sense to find all the arguments needed when putting down a big bet on a fighter, but that still doesn't make it more rational. Of course I don't know if you really want to help and inform people about betting advice, but you make it hard for me to believe you sometimes.
Im a fan of Jouban and dislike Perry. Because of Jouban being a underdog and my biasedness, i've put down a small stab on Jouban ML. I rather play the fight ending in TKO/KO since I know that Perry very likely could stop Jouban.
When that is said and done, I still think (as objectively as possible) that this is Jouban's fight to loose. Perry has all the chances in the world to win against a big part of the division WHEN his opponents are willing to fight a dog fight with him. This is where he thrives, and this is why im saying that this is Jouban's fight to loose, because he often find himself in a dog fight, even though he doesn't has to be in one.
Perry has the power, but he swings so wild at times, and really gives zero fucks about setting up his punches. As long as he can fight a dog fight and trade in the pocket, he knows that he can win at any given moment. I don't think that you rationally have thought about that some of the fighters that dropped Jouban was langy tall fighters and was because of his willingness to not give a fuck. This is just a fact. I don't see Perry dropping Jouban or stop him, IF Jouban just stay at his own comfortable range and not in the pocket.
When you're so comitted to call the above fighters low level fighters (LOL), why not throw Roberts in there as well? Roberts has really underperformed IMO, and shown every bit of what you shouldn't do in a fight, like the last one against Perry. Perry only won that because of Roberts fuck ups, and this is, if we measure by your standards, a low level fighter. This is exactly why I think there are some holes in your arguments, when you, without hesitating, stating some of your "obvious" arguments without spending 1 second to explain the negative sides to your own bet/pick. It's soooo mind bogling to me, that you call Belal a overrated fighter. We both know that you only do that because of his recent KO loss. It doesn't make any sence. I think that Belal would absolutely pick Perry apart with his technical way of fighting. You simply cannot remove the already proven skills of a fighter, just because of a KO loss. If Jouban pace himself he will most likely win over Perry like he did against Belal.
When all this is said and done, I wouldn't feel confident in picking Perry or Jouban. Just want to analyze this fight in the most rational way possible.
I've spend some energy writing this post for YOU, so please don't give me any bullcrap and please respond in a way where we can have a rational discussion
#EGOHasNoBusinessInSportsBetting