Keep in mind Ribo tends to give up at least one round in all of his decisions so far, and this is the toughest test he's had. Imo at his current price there's no reason to bet him.I bet Nasrat against Jared Gordon and was pretty disgusted with what I saw. Ribovics should have more than enough to win this fight.
Keep in mind Ribo tends to give up at least one round in all of his decisions so far, and this is the toughest test he's had. Imo at his current price there's no reason to bet him.
He's in the Rodolfo Vieira zone as far as value goes. There's safer favorites to pick up for a similar line.
You can get Gomis for better odds than Ribo currently, and I don't see why he wouldn't beat Amil.Who do you think are safer favorites on the card?
I'm waiting for Chepe KO line. Didn't cash against Jackson (though there were opportunities), but Ramos is pretty damn frail. Only 1 out of his 6 losses was by decision.Chepe and Casteneda look safe to me. Both are better at applying a high pace work rate in 3 rounds, i like them as a team mexico parlay.
Chepe and Casteneda look safe to me. Both are better at applying a high pace work rate in 3 rounds, i like them as a team mexico parlay.
i'll probably hedge a ko line if it's wide enough to profit with a decision line for chepe, i'll sacrifice a unit there.I'm waiting for Chepe KO line. Didn't cash against Jackson (though there were opportunities), but Ramos is pretty damn frail. Only 1 out of his 6 losses was by decision.
Not very worried about the BJJ because Chepe did pretty well against Sabatini way back when in the regional circuit, and he's not someone who just lays flat on his back.
I like John as well, but Douglas can pull some bullshit out his ass (Morozov) to win so idk if I'm willing to play the current odds.
agreed.Chepe work rate is elite. Maybe not Merab level but the next tier for sure (Merab probably his own tier). It's a lot of juice but imo there's almost no way Chepe loses if it sees the cards. A low likelihood meme sub might be the only chance he loses.
agreed.
you have a take on Danny Silva?
On Patterson. I understand he can get knocked out here but I don't see how Barlow covers this line at all. Patterson should have a massive advantage on the ground and Barlow isn't particularly high output on the feet.
I'm starting to lean towards Patterson too. If you really look at Barlow, what has he done? The Nikolay win certainly didn't age well after he was dominated by Vandeford. I'll admit he was in control over Quinlan, but he also didn't get him out of there quickly and Quinlan hasn't won a fight since. Rahaem was just a see who goes down first fight. Besides that, most of his early finishes are cans. He went to decision with a 1-1 fighter. You can argue this is a bad matchup for Patterson stylistically, but I'd argue he's far more potent on the ground than Barlow is standing. He's also got pretty solid wins over guys like Magomedov. I'm really having trouble understanding the line the more that I look into it.