- Joined
- Mar 24, 2012
- Messages
- 11,496
- Reaction score
- 1,018
Why did they give garbrandt almeida > mizugaki
Should have been the other way around
Wanted to stay active because caraway wasn't available. He wants Dominick.
Why did they give garbrandt almeida > mizugaki
Should have been the other way around
You really shouldn't be talking.Fucking retarded post
They were going to make Garbrandt vs Caraway but I believe Caraway wasn't ready and Garbrandt wanted a fight so Mizugaki was the highest ranked guy that was available (i.e. not hurt) and wasn't already booked in a fight.Why did they give garbrandt almeida > mizugaki
Should have been the other way around
Not to mention Mizugaki is a veteran fighter with a better resume than Almeida who presents different challenges than fighting another undefeated striker like the formerly undefeated Brazilian prospect. I would argue Mizugaki is a step up in competition in terms of a test for Garbrandt from Almeida.They were going to make Garbrandt vs Caraway but I believe Caraway wasn't ready and Garbrandt wanted a fight so Mizugaki was the highest ranked guy that was available (i.e. not hurt) and wasn't already booked in a fight.
Not to mention Mizugaki is a veteran fighter with a better resume than Almeida who presents different challenges than fighting another undefeated striker like the formerly undefeated Brazilian prospect. I would argue Mizugaki is a step up in competition in terms of a test for Garbrandt from Almeida.
I agree. Almeida's best win's were Yves Jabouin and Brad Pickett (whom he almost got KO'ed by). Mizugaki has been in there with some of the top 135'ers and I think the odds are WWAAAAYYYY off. No way should Cody be a -560 favorite. That shit is crazy.Not to mention Mizugaki is a veteran fighter with a better resume than Almeida who presents different challenges than fighting another undefeated striker like the formerly undefeated Brazilian prospect. I would argue Mizugaki is a step up in competition in terms of a test for Garbrandt from Almeida.
So if you backed Penn in Penn vs Edgar 1, would it be reactionary to back Edgar in the rematch?
I would hope Conor backers would consider changing their mind after this fight played out with Diaz in on 10 days notice and won
Cowboy has not been a slow starter since his move up to WW. I think the weightcut stress and all that may affect him more than we thought. He looks much more relaxed and loose since he moved up.Kind of surprised that a lot of people are favoring Cerrone against Story. I know Cerrone has looked good in his last few fights, but I feel like Story is just so durable and has been in there with some top guys at WW. I think his pressure, coupled with his work to the body won't bode well for Cerrone, who is a notoriously slow starter. Cerrone is also already talking about his potential next fight. It seems as though he is looking past Story. While I can respect the confidence, overlooking someone like Story is never a good idea. At +130 odds, I'm gonna lay down a decent bet on Story.
What would the odds shift have to do with change of opinion after watching the first fight though? Diaz is still a dog at the end of the day, and he beat Conor on 10 days notice. If there was ever a fight that should drastically sway someone, it was their first encounter. Many of us felt full camp Diaz would be bad stylistically for Conor, and in a way he showed that to be true. It would be kind of crazy to ignore that just cause you can have Conor at better odds now.Well Penn remained a pretty heavy favorite. The implied odds didn't change that much drastically as many thought Penn won that first fight. JDS vs. Cain 1 and JDS vs. Cain 2 is another. Odds didn't change that much. This is one of the most drastic odd shifts you'll find. That's the point that I'm trying to make.
7:30What time should I expect Larkin-magny to be on? Around 7:15-7:30? Trying to plan my day out tmrw
Arsenal vs Leicester at 12:30, might watch the Germany/Brazil game at 4:30, then this card
What would the odds shift have to do with change of opinion after watching the first fight though? Diaz is still a dog at the end of the day, and he beat Conor on 10 days notice. If there was ever a fight that should drastically sway someone, it was their first encounter. Many of us felt full camp Diaz would be bad stylistically for Conor, and in a way he showed that to be true. It would be kind of crazy to ignore that just cause you can have Conor at better odds now.
Also, grats to anyone who was betting in the days of Edgar vs Penn. I just looked at odds for their rematch. Edgar was +260?! Are you fucking kidding me, talk about one of the best bets ever
It definitly can happen but I dont see it as a standing KO.Glover by TKO/KO/DQ @ +812...I think I see some value there.
He doesn't possess the power that Rumble has, but he's a good boxer, all it takes is one well placed shot in their weight division for anyone to go down.
That is interesting. Plus he is 22.. no "old man strenght" for him.Garbrant: Didn't look like he had any core muscles.