U.S. Military vs The rest of the World

Jack Handy jr

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
13,722
Reaction score
1,423
Who takes it and why...only restriction is no Nukes.
upload_2018-4-26_20-15-6.jpeg

I think if we decided to drop some area 51 advanced emp on Russia and china were they couldn't employ their nuclear forces we'd win what say you?
images


mind you the Uniteds States spends more money on their DISCLOSED defense budget than the Rest of the worlds countries combined.
images


example our Marine Corps is a combined total force with an air force and a Navy. if there was a total war scenario disregarding collateral damage and human rights I believe our Marine Corps Air Ground task force could defeat France and the United Kingdom.

images




add the other Branches into it and we could rule the world thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Obligatory

War room......>
 
Last edited:
Not AmeriCAN!

We can't even control a small country in the Middle East and people think we can take over the world. Lol. War isn't like it was in the past where two armies confronted each other and one won.
 
I know that Americans are very proud of their military and their detractors like to point out they haven't outright won a war since WW2. I think the idea of winning/losing in war is getting outdated, it's all about the political maneuvering before and during the war so you have international support.
 
Wouldn't the whole rest of the world just focus their efforts on insurgency and guerrilla tactics by attacking our weak spots, hit and run, disrupt our supply lines, try to bankrupt us and just make our lives miserable? As Bin Laden said, death by a thousand papercuts. We would really have to take the gloves off. It would have to be like Desert Storm, divide areas into grids and assign each grid to unit with the order to kill everything in their grid.
 
We can't even control a small country in the Middle East and people think we can take over the world. Lol. War isn't like it was in the past where two armies confronted each other and one won.

So what makes you think the world can take on 300,000,000 armed civilians?
 
So what makes you think the world can take on 300,000,000 armed civilians?

Lmao thats ludicrous. The vast, vast majority of people are not signing up to go to war. Maybe they'll tweet about it.

Going to war with the rest of the world is a great way to lose our place at the top though.
 
Lmao thats ludicrous. The vast, vast majority of people are not signing up to go to war. Maybe they'll tweet about it.

Going to war with the rest of the world is a great way to lose our place at the top though.

If America got invaded literally every single household would be armed.
 
It's gonna be a stalemate.

The rest of the world doesn't have the military ability for expeditionary warfare besides the U.S. as the U.S. will be in control much of the oceans since it takes years to build ever an aircraft carrier.

U.S. would fuck up any hostile forces in North America quickly since the rest of the world wouldn't be able to supply their forces in time against a top tier armed forces. U.S.'s priority will be securing oil reserves in North and South America in order to feed the war machine. No one wins this as the U.S. won't invade the Europe, Asia, Africa...etc. Too far of a reach.
 
Last edited:
This thread again already?

Get ready for a shit storm to come lol
 
If America got invaded literally every single household would be armed.

We'd already have taken a major L if the US was in a position to get invaded in the first place. We're the ones who do the invading.
 
No. The rest of the world is simply too big. Engaging China alone would cripple both of our economies.

lol no. You have no idea what is even just on our submarines. We have dozens of subs that could destroy the world.
 
Back
Top