- Joined
- Mar 30, 2023
- Messages
- 2,405
- Reaction score
- 4,958
on second thought this story sounds like the work of Nurgle. Maybe we need God-Emperor Trump after all
Tyson foods dumps a bunch of toxic shit in your belly every time you eat their foodstuffs, might as well poison the environment as well.
Thats been my point. All the conservative posters are calling for jail, closing them down, etc.
what a well thought out responseSure
The proposed FY 2025 budget for the EPA provides $10.994 billion and 17,145 FTE to support the Agency’s mission of protecting human health and the environment. This includes more than 2,000 new FTE to address the Agency’s priorities and work with our partners across the Nation.
Fiscal Year | Enacted Budget | Workforce |
---|---|---|
FY 2023 | $10,135,433,000 | 15,115 |
FY 2022 | $9,559,485,000 | 14,581 |
FY 2021 | $9,237,153,000 | 14,297 |
FY 2020 | $9,057,401,000 | 14,172 |
FY 2019 | $8,849,488,000 | 14,172 |
FY 2018 | $8,824,488,000 | 14,172 |
FY 2017 | $8,058,488,000 | 15,408 |
FY 2016 | $8,139,887,000 | 14,779 |
FY 2015 | $8,139,887,000 | 14,725 |
FY 2014 | $8,200,000,000 | 15,408 |
FY 2013 | $7,901,104,000 | 15,913 |
FY 2012 | $8,449,385,000 | 17,106 |
FY 2011 | $8,682,117,000 | 17,359 |
FY 2010 | $10,297,864,000 | 17,278 |
FY 2009 | $7,643,674,000 | 17,049 |
FY 2008 | $7,472,324,000 | 16,916 |
FY 2007 | $7,725,130,000 | 17,072 |
FY 2006 | $7,617,416,000 | 17,355 |
FY 2005 | $8,023,483,000 | 17,495 |
FY 2004 | $8,365,420,000 | 17,611 |
FY 2003 | $8,078,703,000 | 17,741 |
FY 2002 | $8,078,813,000 | 17,590 |
FY 2001 | $7,832,211,000 | 17,558 |
FY 2000 | $7,562,811,000 | 17,726 |
Its all it deserves.what a well thought out response
Well, I'm sure Biden's DOJ is going to fine them into hell, right? The problem surely wouldn't go on for half of his term, right?You have to be calling for jail for the Republican f****** politicians who support this kind of deregulation though. Otherwise it looks ignorant or hypocritical.
Or you can just admit that the GOP is f****** terrible in this area and defend why you'll still vote for them for other reasons which is fine.
"Sustainability" lol. There's absolutely no such thing when it comes to eating beef. The amount of food, water and land it requires to produce beef is absolutely fuckin insane. Millions of people on this planet starve while we pack like 50% of our crop production into the bellies of livestock so we can eat them instead.
Isn't chicken and pork Tyson's primary thing? I'm not really a fan of eating fowl, swine, or water bugs. Eating birds, nah dude. Bring the Beef or GET THE FUCK OUT!! All of my steaks are sourced from local ranchers with a priority placed on quality, safety, and sustainability -- no antibiotics, added hormones, or feedlots.
Butwhatabout some other guy who is not Trump? lolBut my question has nothing to do with the current administration. I'm asking you specifically about Trumps policy decisions. Also, are you also so stupid that you've forgotten how time works? Who asked a question first? Why are you so desperate to deflect and not answer a specific direct question about TRUMPS policy choices?
Gee, could it be that your blatant and obvious deflection and refusal to answer is an implicit acknowledgement that you realize Trump degraded and exploited the environment of America at the behest of corporations, and that your simpleton ego just won't allow you to acknowledge it publicly? Noooooo couldn't be
Why don't you just respond to what people tell you instead of doing what aboutism? the Republican party is far far far worse and if you care about this issue at all, you can't vote for them. So why don't you explain that? Or like I said, respectfully to you just explain why you vote for them anyway even though you know they're absolutely s*** on this issue.Well, I'm sure Biden's DOJ is going to fine them into hell, right? The problem surely wouldn't go on for half of his term, right?
Oh wait thats right, the filibuster exists and so does Joe Manchin so the dems can't do anything lol.
I don't believe voting for the corporatist democrats is going to change things very much. As I've already pointed out, Tyson already dumped waste for half of Biden's term.Why don't you just respond to what people tell you instead of doing what aboutism? the Republican party is far far far worse and if you care about this issue at all, you can't vote for them. So why don't you explain that? Or like I said, respectfully to you just explain why you vote for them anyway even though you know they're absolutely s*** on this issue.
You are wrong then. On this issue you are VERY wrong.I don't believe voting for the corporatist democrats is going to change things very much. As I've already pointed out, Tyson already dumped waste for half of Biden's term.
Why don't you just respond to what people tell you instead of doing what aboutism? the Republican party is far far far worse and if you care about this issue at all, you can't vote for them. So why don't you explain that? Or like I said, respectfully to you just explain why you vote for them anyway even though you know they're absolutely s*** on this issue.
"Sustainability" lol. There's absolutely no such thing when it comes to eating beef. The amount of food, water and land it requires to produce beef is absolutely fuckin insane. Millions of people on this planet starve while we pack like 50% of our crop production into the bellies of livestock so we can eat them instead.
Eat whatever you want, I guess, even if it means driving your species extinct. But don't go around convincing yourself and others it's "sustainable" while it's literally sparking a mass extinction event lmfaoo
I take it you don't vote at all then?
Well, I hope Biden's DOJ hammers them, but I have my doubts considering Tyson is giving his illegals jobs.You are wrong then. On this issue you are VERY wrong.
we've been eating meat since the beginning of time, beef closely fits the definition of sustainability. We grown corn specifically for livestock feed (mostly)."Sustainability" lol. There's absolutely no such thing when it comes to eating beef. The amount of food, water and land it requires to produce beef is absolutely fuckin insane. Millions of people on this planet starve while we pack like 50% of our crop production into the bellies of livestock so we can eat them instead.
Eat whatever you want, I guess, even if it means driving your species extinct. But don't go around convincing yourself and others it's "sustainable" while it's literally sparking a mass extinction event lmfaoo
It's telling when a person won't give straight answers.I take it you don't vote at all then?
It's telling when a person won't give straight answers.
We also used to slaughter competing villages and rape their women, since the beginning of time. What a retarded fucking argumentwe've been eating meat since the beginning of time, beef closely fits the definition of sustainability. We grown corn specifically for livestock feed (mostly).
you can eat a corn diet, bypassing animal production, if it makes you feel better.
Do you know or think the carp eat all that stuff? Illinois thought putting an exotic fish in its river was a good idea. Clearly not. And they get big. Then again I don't know if the carp are in the waters in Missouri.They have been for years. There’s a spot called Noel, Missouri down stream from one of their facilities. You see chicken parts floating along when tubeing.