- Joined
- Aug 8, 2008
- Messages
- 1,691
- Reaction score
- 0
An attorney would have a field day on that 'question and answer'. Was he specifically answering with respect to the 'report' that has been discredited? Was he speaking about any and all contacts with Russians irrespective of the content of the discussions? Was he specifically referring to conversations relating to influencing of the election? What was the intent of Sessions reply relative to his interpretation of the question?
In such a short Q&A there are such major discrepancies relative to the question, it's interpretation and the reply given. To quote everyone's favorite prez, "depends what the definition of 'is', is."
In such a short Q&A there are such major discrepancies relative to the question, it's interpretation and the reply given. To quote everyone's favorite prez, "depends what the definition of 'is', is."