Two Russia/Trump stories break tonight.

I don't remember all this outrage from the left when Loretta Lynch was canoodling with Bill Clinton leading up to the election.
According to Obamas comment, it isn't just Trumpites who play partisan. However, it would be the same if the roles were reversed. I know this.

I really do believe this whole Russian invasion has been overblown. They may have leaked some personal emails or something, but the idea they they are reeking havoc is a stretch.
*wreaking
 
Clinton got 35 million after approving a deal to give Putin 20% of US Uranium. The Clinton Foundation got $145 million. No only did Democrats not care, they saw no problem with it. If Trump pulled that deal, they would want him dead for treason. Russian only became the boogeyman when Clinton lost.


https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

That's what I'm saying, fug these people. They are such shameless, dishonest liars. Why is anyone even doing anything but dismissing and spitting in these idiots is beyond me.
 
Clinton got 35 million after approving a deal to give Putin 20% of US Uranium. The Clinton Foundation got $145 million. No only did Democrats not care, they saw no problem with it. If Trump pulled that deal, they would want him dead for treason. Russian only became the boogeyman when Clinton lost.


https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
She was personally paid $35 million dollars for Uranium? That sounds completely untrue. Source?
 
Pelosi calling for Session's resignation.

"Sessions is not fit to serve as the top law enforcement officer of our country and must resign."
 
The Democrats have no power so they are usually the Russia Boogeyman that is Putin to remove Trump from office. This will bring the blue collar democrats and independents back to your party.
 
Shady behavior.

Lynch's behavior wasn't shady. She was mortified that Bill approached her, but she didn't know what to do. And then she immediately separated herself from the process.

And Sessions didn't lie regarding the context and subject of the question.

Either way, this will be cleared up, Sessions will be fine and the Dems will continue to charge forward with their pitchforks.

I don't see how you can deny that he lied. Just imagine you didn't know what party he was in or who he was. He volunteered that he had not met with the Russians, and he met with them. I don't see how there's any possible dispute.

And, like I said, it would not surprise me to see Republicans in Congress put party before country or the rule of law here, and I wouldn't expect patriotic Americans to just let it go because Congress has decided to abdicate their responsibility.

So funny how the Russians have become such a huge deal.

Not long ago, when Romney brought up the Russians, Obama told him " the 80's called, they want their politics back".

Romney said that Russia was our biggest geopolitical rival! That's not just bringing them up, and it's kind of ridiculous. Also, was Romney right or wrong? Seems like you're defending him but not?
 
He was going to recuse himself anyways. That's not what the issue was. The issue was perjury. As you can see, Sessions is still AG. Him recusing himself actually helps the story die down, and is the right thing to do.

The investigation will turn up nothing.

So youre saying that before any of this this came out, he had previously decided that he would recuse himself on March 2 because it was "the right thing to do"? If so, lmao.
 
Dam, so many people connected to Trump just happen to meet Russians at some point. I'm sure it's nothing ;)
 
At no time in that story does it say that Hilary Clinton received $35 million dollars for Uranium, or for anything else.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...n-amid-us-russian_us_58aa5dd6e4b0fa149f9ac82f

http://www.businessinsider.com/the-clintons-putin-and-uranium-2015-4


At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The Associated Press. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million.

If you replace Clinton with Trump in the story above, how would Washington Post journalists react? 85 people give $156 million to Trump’s foundation and nobody questions the transfer of money?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,218
Messages
57,975,528
Members
175,889
Latest member
MEthzale
Back
Top