Turner vs Gamrot is the perfect example of crap judging

TomTomNT

Brown Belt
Joined
Dec 5, 2010
Messages
3,423
Reaction score
1,373
srsly this dude is winning because he lands 1 takedown a round while getting absolutely destroyed on the feet...

that second round is an embarrassment for the sport...Turner destroyed him and controlled him on the feet for almost 4 minutes... but because he got a takedown with 1 minute left and controlled Turner for 1 minute it instantly over takes 4 minutes? Shit judging and shit logic.

Even round 3... Turner clearly landed the better shots...the very few shots that anyone was allowed to throw because Gamrot was stalling so hard, the shots landed were by Turner... the damage done was by Turner... in what world does a takedown with 10 seconds left win you a round after eating a nasty left straight....its just stupid stupid logic, i feel bad for Turner

Turner won round 1 easily, and anyone that scored round 2 for Gamrot is a fucking idiot and should be ashamed of themselves and their lack of MMA knowledge, Gamrot got absolutely destroyed in round 2 for almost 4 minutes...him winning that round because of a takedown and some rabbit punches is absolutely pathetic scoring.
 
Last edited:
All I care about is round 2 tbh. As you said, Anyone who scored it for Gamrot is a cancer for MMA. Don't care if you score the other 2 for Gamrot

Fire the 30-27 judge immediately
 
Yeah it's a tough one. Gamrot took him down a bunch but did nothing with any of them. Ridiculously easy for Turner to get back to the fence. Turner clearly better on his feet but again apart from that 1 shit in the 3nd that wobbled Gamrot and he danced off, very little in the way of damage beyond a cut at his left temple.
A bit meh all round.
 
I was rooting for Turner, but getting crucifixed multiple times is a little more than "1 takedown"
what the fuck does that even mean... yes its 1 takedown... he landed tiny rabbit punches that did 0 damage whats so ever with that crucifix which he lost in seconds....he had a total of 1 minute and 20 seconds total and lost that crucifix in seconds... how the fuck does that value over almost 4 minutes of domination on the feet? He literally got rocked multiple times and ate the hardest shots of the night which did the most damage by far...this type of thinking is so sad and pathetic its just annoying at this point. We are reverting back to fucking GSP blanket days now,, just get a takedown and everything before that is totally ignored, you could be on your death bed but if you trip and a guy lands on top you lost that round 10-8, shits just insane these days.
 
LMFAO @ "destroyed on the feet".

29-28 either way is aight with me. 30-27 Gamrot no bueno.
 
Gamrot is an elite crotch-sniffer. Before the fight he was averaging more than one takedown attempt per minute. That's insane.
 
Gamrot win easily. Turner is a weight bully and twice his size and still getting manhandled.
 
Agreed. You shouldn't be able to "win" a fight by largely avoiding a fight but largely getting your ass kicked in the fighting that does take place.
 
30-27 was #1 bullshit. Close fight not mad at the decision. That one score was bad though.
 
Yeah I am all for damage trumps wrestling, but this was definitely 2 rounds for Gamrot. As i expected, Jalin will fade round by round and he really did, slowly but surely. He was worse every round and to me he lost last two rounds. Maybe won first… But I can see 30-27 also. Gamrot worked as much as he could, he was trying at least.
 
Back
Top