- Joined
- Feb 12, 2003
- Messages
- 21,148
- Reaction score
- 499
Lol if winning is scaring the uneducated into thinking brown people are coming here to rape and kill them then. Sure
ROFLMAO!
Lol if winning is scaring the uneducated into thinking brown people are coming here to rape and kill them then. Sure
Haven't seen you in a while
Your research showed the percentage of professors and what their views are, that doesn't show how they teach or interpret data.I shared the research.
ROFLMAO!
Wow. Thanks for the insight. Such smartz, such TDS
When you say stupid NPC things, one's response must be laughter.
Your research showed the percentage of professors and what their views are, that doesn't show how they teach or interpret data.
What they all wanted was people to be able to craft, present, and argue with sound logic and statistics to back up that argument.
The only way a professor's political affiliation matters if they're unwilling to accept an argument that isn't with their ideals, and penalizes someone unfairly because they present a viewpoint that contradicts their own.
Better than the black manSo......Orange man good?
TDS kicking in? Man you should see a doctor lol
One symptom of TDS is defending daddy no matter what. Or because libz
Fuck are you ever a moron,or maybe a celebrity.I’m shocked that white voters without college degrees make up 67% of his supporters. Absolutely shocked
it's probably more simple than that. While some occupations are more likely to attract people with strong political affiliations (e.g. police = conservative, social workers = liberal, etc.), most do not. Politics is more likely to be influenced by region and other demographics. Biotech companies are typically located around urban areas with strong academic ties, like Boston, Philadelphia, San Francisco, etc., so there's likely to be plenty of liberal cross-over.
@HomerThompson welcome to the team, rat.Lol grammar nazis are definitely Trump supporters
We can't all have gender studies, sociology or philosophy degrees.
Hard to imagine a time in history when someone like Trump could be as or more electable. If the country was going through an economic crisis or in the middle of a war, voters might have been more drawn to leaders who had displayed nuanced knowledge and competence of the impending crisis the country was about to face. The election was seemingly a rebuke on Liberal culture rather than anything policy specific.
Good points.Na Hillary was such a horrid choice by the Democratic party it dragged down the entire party.
She and her husband Bill was attached to NAFTA an economic downturn it created in the Midwest.
President Trump was effective at convincing midwestern voters he could turn their jobs around.
Hillary did not make trips to depressed areas an only went to key early states like Iowa an New Hampshire an did nearly zero door to door leaving it to her surrogates.
I am pretty sure you could have dug up Genghis Khan an he would have beaten her she was that bad.
You're shocked that the Working Class People who elected him are his supporters?I’m shocked that white voters without college degrees make up 67% of his supporters. Absolutely shocked
You're shocked that the Working Class People who elected him are his supporters?
Low class white people apparently is a pretty large demographic. If you add up all the minorities and the high class white people is probably 50-50 to low class whites.Lol at working class. Some of course are working class but have you seen the people at his rallies?
I don’t know what class that is but the working class isn’t what it was in the 70’s and 80’s. Trump supporters are low class
Lol at working class. Some of course are working class but have you seen the people at his rallies?
I don’t know what class that is but the working class isn’t what it was in the 70’s and 80’s. Trump supporters are low class
Good points.
Slightly off topic, If Hillary won the 2008 primaries, do you think she would have beaten McCain in the General?