International Trump: US control of Greenland is absolute nescessity

[jefferz]

This Alpha could solo Greenland by himself.
Why do all the leaders of MAGA look like SAWFT ass bitches, that got stuffed in lockers in High School.
Elon pasty and pipe cleaner arms, Trump fat, melting pasty skin, and wears a ton of make-up, Vance fucks couches and wears eye-liner. Reagan would be embarrassed by all the SOY Boys who became figure heads in the Grand Oligarch Party.

And let's not forget, Kirk was taking Russian money to spread Russian propaganda.

 

[SandisLL]

Well if about supposed maybe wealthy resources for mining industry? It is corporate business, business is global and it is enough to by enough shares/ a i % in company in order to get control ....
IF after x or xx there will be income from investments.

If about military?
U.S had installed first base in Greenland in 1941 th, it was radio station and meterology station in order to assist ...lend lease deliveries caravans with weather prognosis and radio network.
Next point was installed in 1943 th
... then some during Cold War.
Now at least on paper Greenland does have 2? bases and several points.

Yes, Greenlad was very important during Cold war... radars, radio stations, sonars network... airfields.. Like Iceland...

Will Donny really invest in bases and increase funding for these? 2016-2020 didn't looked that he was very interested at all. Just empty tales about possible purchase ...Greenland.

 

[ShadowRun]

Literally Hitler, just destroyed democracy

 

[ShadowRun]

Literally Hitler, just destroyed democracy

 

[Wrath of Foamy]

This US obsession with Greenland and Denmark seems to be the most random, our of left field thing.

Denmark don't do anything but export salamis.

 

[44nutman]

Literally Hitler, just destroyed democracy

Obama was laughing at Trump talking about the gold plated cuck chair Leon bought him.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

This US obsession with Greenland and Denmark seems to be the most random, our of left field thing.

Denmark don't do anything but export salamis.

Trump has wanted it since his first admin. And has been talked about for decades as a very important strategic area to box Russia in

I don’t like the big boss woman aspect of this clip, a bit cringe, but it does a good job showing the strategic importance

 

[cincymma79]

Multiple pages of Pearl clutching I assume?

 

[Eusung]

lol the left have gone mental over this topic



"When the bombs are in the air" -what a lunatic Kyle has become.

 

[Rob Battisti]

Link

Important article from the former head of NATO strategic command on why Greenland is strategically important for the USA.

 

[Wrath of Foamy]

Trump has wanted it since his first admin. And has been talked about for decades as a very important strategic area to box Russia in

I don’t like the big boss woman aspect of this clip, a bit cringe, but it does a good job showing the strategic importance

Thanks. It was interesting.

With that said however, Greenland is Denmark territory and based on what has been posted in here, Greenland residents seem to be quite happy with that.

 

[ChosenOne]

This US obsession with Greenland and Denmark seems to be the most random, our of left field thing.

Denmark don't do anything but export salamis.

As Climate change continues to lessen sea ice, this trend, if not stopped will open up the Northwest passage shipping lane.

The NorthWest passage would substantially reduce the value of the Panama and Suez Canals as major routes to much of the world sea transport allowing ships much shorter travel time generally and not having to cue up at costly canal and lock systems.

Currently the countries with the strongest territory claims on the Northwest passage are Canada, Russia and Greenland/Denmark.

This is entirely why Trump and the US see it as so strategic as they have no plans to try and slow the effects of climate change and want to ensure they will be the biggest beneficiaries of it.

Beyond that and why Trump muses about taking over Canada is that overall Canada is predicted to be one of the biggest beneficiary of climate change, with the least harm. The border areas of Canada, near the US rising in temps may see them replicate a more normal 'Florida' type temperatures. Desired by many. But vast, vast regions of Canada's north, historically unliveable are now currently opening and are very resource rich (water, lumber, minerals and oil) and that is only going to continue.

YOu can absolutely predict a future where you can draw a line in the US below which water, drought issues, extreme weather and other issues will see people needing to migrate out while at the same time Canada is looking to populate vast areas of now open arable land to generate tax revenue from.

Would Canada open up for a Land Rush type grab for Americans and others willing to move and settle our North, in the way the US West was settled? Would Canada then become the economic power in North America, over time, with the bigger population and mass resource wealth?

There are many US think tank papers discussing just this, which is why Trump and those who back him have the wet dream of locking Canada and Greenland down as US States so it is the US gaining all that benefit and not falling in stature over time.

 

[Andy Capp]

lol the left have gone mental over this topic



"When the bombs are in the air" -what a lunatic Kyle has become.

Get back to me if the US withdraws from NATO. If--but that's a gigantic if--that happens then you can bet SHTF soon after. Until then, it's more just disgusting and should be an embarrassment to all Americans that you elected this Orange Turd.

 

[Rational Poster]

Link

Important article from the former head of NATO strategic command on why Greenland is strategically important for the USA.

Well, Denmark and Greenland are already part of NATO, so any strategic importance of Greenland to the United States can be fully accessed without direct ownership of the territory. If we wanted to build bases or military infrastructure anywhere in Greenland for strategic defense purposes we just have to ask and they would say yes and probably even contribute. We've already done this multiple times in the past.

Denmark, Greenland, and Iceland have currently and historically always been extremely conciliatory and cooperative with US defense needs on their territory.

 

[LostMyBlackBelt]

Greenland is key to nato controlling Russia, traitor Trump can;t wait for his reward fuck from Putin.

 

[Kingz]

Why exactly are democrats opposed to this?

Adding Greenland is a based idea all around.

If you’re an environmentalist nut job that think the future goes through the Arctic.
If you’re a Russia hawk.
If you’re a capitalist prospector.
If you’re a trade route connoisseur.
This should enjoy broad support and it makes sense.

Adding Greenland is a good idea.

I think democrats are just salty they didn’t think of it..

and if they did think of it, they certainly don’t have Trump’s testicular fortitude to forcefully push for negotations when a weak ass welfare state plays coy.

Let alone any confidence that they will close…like Trump will.

 

[Rational Poster]

Why exactly are democrats opposed to this?

Adding Greenland is a based idea all around.

If you’re an environmentalist nut job that think the future goes through the Arctic.
If you’re a Russia hawk.
If you’re a capitalist prospector.
If you’re a trade route connoisseur.
This should enjoy broad support and it makes sense.

Adding Greenland is a good idea.

I think democrats are just salty they didn’t think of it..

and if they did think of it, they certainly don’t have Trump’s testicular fortitude to forcefully push for negotations when a weak ass welfare state plays coy.

Let alone any confidence that they will close…like Trump will.

We can access all of those benefits without any of the costs associated of being owners of the territory with our current relationship with Denmark and Greenland.

It doesn't make any sense at all.

You bozos are just trying to paint a target around a bullseye because Trump said some dumb shit.

----------------------

 

[USA!USA!]

Why exactly are democrats opposed to this?

Adding Greenland is a based idea all around.

If you’re an environmentalist nut job that think the future goes through the Arctic.
If you’re a Russia hawk.
If you’re a capitalist prospector.
If you’re a trade route connoisseur.
This should enjoy broad support and it makes sense.

Adding Greenland is a good idea.

I think democrats are just salty they didn’t think of it..

and if they did think of it, they certainly don’t have Trump’s testicular fortitude to forcefully push for negotations when a weak ass welfare state plays coy.

Let alone any confidence that they will close…like Trump will.

The issue isn't taking Greenland and making it a US territory. I don't think people are opposed to that idea. It's the threatening allied countries with military action, and making weird propaganda appearances on their island.

The way they are going about it is what is weird, not the fact that they want it. It's not a democrat vs republican thing. If Biden did the same thing, people would think it was fucked up.

 

[HOLA]

The issue isn't taking Greenland and making it a US territory. I don't think people are opposed to that idea. It's the threatening allied countries with military action, and making weird propaganda appearances on their island.

The way they are going about it is what is weird, not the fact that they want it. It's not a democrat vs republican thing. If Biden did the same thing, people would think it was fucked up.

Let's not forget that it's not just Greenland; Orange wants to take over Canada and the Panama canal too.

I assume Cuba will be added to the list at some point in the near future.

 

[Substance Abuse]

Obama was laughing at Trump talking about the gold plated cuck chair Leon bought him.