Trump may fire Mueller next week

[SBJJ]

I just want you to substantiate your claim. No more, no less.

Claim?

U mean my post that was a question? Do you understand the difference between a claim n a question?

I believe trump would be the most important source though. So there is that

Just checked. His lawyers deny it also

 

[SBJJ]

But this is the "source" he is going to fire him

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/d...bert-mueller-before-christmas/article/2643742

Sweet

 

[7437]

You putting this on that level? Ok. If you're right, I want to see jail time.

It still seems like it's based on bullshit.

those are the only other examples of an investigation like this into the president. and whitewater was bullshit too.

 

[splendica]

Ben Shapiro (of not being a dummy fame), thinks Trump may actually be starting to win:

 

[Deleted member 429137]

Ben Shapiro (of not being a dummy fame), thinks Trump may actually be starting to win:

I am certain that if I go back through Shapiro's youtube channel I will see past videos where he's explaining how Trump is actually starting to win. It's the kind of uplifting promises they put out consistently to keep their listeners tuned in.

I also am doubtful that I will see videos of him discussing Trump losing before he was now winning.

 

[splendica]

I am certain that if I go back through Shapiro's youtube channel I will see past videos where he's explaining how Trump is actually starting to win. It's the kind of uplifting promises they put out consistently to keep their listeners tuned in.

I also am doubtful that I will see videos of him discussing Trump losing before he was now winning.

He wasn't much of a fan prior to the election but thought he was better than Hillary. Then throughout the year he had critical moments and still does. I am pro Jew and I know the Jerusalem decision affected Ben's opinion positively. He still is sharp and I'd have expected more negativity if he thought an impeachment was incoming.

 

[Demoslasher]

All I can say to this is Republicans will defend anything so long as the person in question has a R next to their name...the party as a whole has lost any sense of morality, replaced with this tribal mentality that puts the party over their own interests, the people they serve in their district, and America as a whole...fucking hard to watch a party that once actually stood for something devolve into a party of bumper sticker policy and platitudes aimed at the lowest education voter.

Its also sad that you same people spent 8 years trying to crucify Obama for every stupid little thing, yet now we have mounting evidence of a historic scandal involving another nation tampering with the election, that might go all the way to the president which would be a sitting president being accused of treason...and you people are doing everything you can do to defend him

 

[Happy Man]

All I can say to this is Republicans will defend anything so long as the person in question has a R next to their name...the party as a whole has lost any sense of morality, replaced with this tribal mentality that puts the party over their own interests

The Alabama senate vote shows this assumption is incorrect. Many republicans either stayed home and many others actually voted for jones.

 

[AnGrYcRoW]

All I can say to this is Republicans will defend anything so long as the person in question has a R next to their name...the party as a whole has lost any sense of morality, replaced with this tribal mentality that puts the party over their own interests, the the people they serve in their district, and America as a whole...fucking hard to watch a party that once actually stood for something devolve into a party of pumper sticker policy and platitudes aimed at the lowest education voter.

Its also sad that you same people spent 8 years trying to crucify Obama for every stupid little thing, yet now we have mounting evidence of a historic scandal involving another nation tampering with the election, that might go all the way to the president which would be a sitting president being accused of treason...and you people are doing everything you can do to defend him

Quoted because sometimes a like isn't enough

 

[Demoslasher]

The Alabama senate vote shows this assumption is incorrect. Many republicans either stayed home and many others actually voted for jones.

The Alabama vote...a phille that said America was better when Slavery was still in effect and was repeatedly kicked off the bench for invoking Gods Law for atrocious rulings. A man that refuses to debate his opponent, said Muslims couldn't serve in congress, and rode a fucking horse to vote dressed like Howdy fucking Doody...lost by only %2 of the vote...if anything that verifies the point I'm trying to make

 

[Big Nasty Edison]

All I can say to this is Republicans will defend anything so long as the person in question has a R next to their name...the party as a whole has lost any sense of morality, replaced with this tribal mentality that puts the party over their own interests, the the people they serve in their district, and America as a whole...fucking hard to watch a party that once actually stood for something devolve into a party of pumper sticker policy and platitudes aimed at the lowest education voter.

Its also sad that you same people spent 8 years trying to crucify Obama for every stupid little thing, yet now we have mounting evidence of a historic scandal involving another nation tampering with the election, that might go all the way to the president which would be a sitting president being accused of treason...and you people are doing everything you can do to defend him

 

[InternetHero]

If he does it it's because it's his best option, in other words he will do it if he knows they have proof of bad doings and the walls are closing in .

Yeah, I know what you are saying and half-agree, but then again if someone has a team of prosecutors and can go through all of your personal business, especially someone rich and powerful, the chances they find "something" wrong have to be fairly high.

Not that I sympathize with Trump. He went out of his way to make these enemies, and, to do so publicly and noisily, which is not how you handle this kind of politics.

It looks like there will be nothing about collusion and some distantly connected obstruction charges for xyz parties that will likely have nothing to do with Russia, or even Russian square dancing.

 

[Joe]

So much for the investigation going to wrap up soon

How many repubs are going to do trumps dirty work for him and set the environment of mueller needs to be fired?

 

[Deleted member 504083]

 

[Demoslasher]

So much for the investigation going to wrap up soon

How many repubs are going to do trumps dirty work for him and set the environment of mueller needs to be fired?

At this point they would be essentially admitting guilt to fire him after he has uncovered so much. It would effectively make people whom might be giving him the benefit of the doubt, reason to believe that there's something here that the administration wants kept quiet. After all, if you have nothing to hide, you don't fire a person that could prove beyond reasonable doubt to everyone that you are in fact innocent.

The basis for firing him is what exactly? Outside of the shallow and mostly incoherent arguments suggesting that he is bias, there is nothing. And the bias nonsense falls apart at a feathers weight of scrutiny, seeing that the man is a Republican for starters, and a man of unquestionable qualifications for this task, and commanding respect on both sides of the isle. This after all is why he was selected to be the special investigator...until of course Republicans realized that they had thrown their hats in with a candidate that if this investigation keeps going where it's going, could tarnish the Republican Party for a generation. They are in panic mode, make no mistake about it, hence why they are trying to find a way out.

 

[Demoslasher]

So you post a video of a guy that knows next to nothing about anything, yelling things at a news recording(factually incorrect information), to prove what exactly? That YouTube video bloggers are for the most part retarded but unfortunately also love to talk? We already knew that...

 

[Deleted member 504083]

So you post a video of a guy that knows next to nothing about anything, yelling things at a news recording(factually incorrect information), to prove what exactly? That YouTube video bloggers are for the most part retarded but unfortunately also love to talk? We already knew that...

It doesn't matter who's channel it is or what you think of him. The important part is the congressional hearing.

 

[Prex32]

I dont think you have a solid grasp of how government works

it actually shows how dirty they work
get out of your bubble already

 

[DickSarp]

Apparently the police can only say nice things about the people they investigate nowadays.

 

[GSP_37]

What's Jim Jordan getting in return for throwing away any of his credibility?