Elections Trump for POTUS mega thread


Healthiest President ever. Even Congressman Ronny Johnson who is also a Dr will tell you how healthy this man is.

OIP.bx1VFTi21HuBZHYnue59xAAAAA
 
Another idiot who didn't read what I said.


I'm not surprised you'd defend a lie like that, considering you tucked tail and ran the last time we got into it because you got caught lying. You could redeem yourself and admit that claim that there were only white people there was a lie.This is a strange thing for you to cry about.

Yeah, it's not a lie because you were the only person dumb enough to take that statement literally.


How about you highlight the portion of the article(s) that gave you this impression. I think the room is generally curious as to how anyone could have such poor reading comprehension.
 
Another idiot who didn't read what I said.


I'm not surprised you'd defend a lie like that, considering you tucked tail and ran the last time we got into it because you got caught lying. You could redeem yourself and admit that claim that there were only white people there was a lie.This is a strange thing for you to cry about.

so where is this said claim you speak of, and just who is making this claim? are they real world people with a name and face to attach to their claim? post this claim pls!

oh yeah, it has to say ONLY white people in such claim. keyword "only". you're the one making this claim, and i'm sure it will be little effort for you to back it up. if that's really what people are saying of course.

and remember: "not many black people showed up" ≠ "only white people showed up"

i mean sure, there were one or two black people in a crowd full of white people over at a black church. but that's like trying to make the deceiving impression on people that the seattle seahawks have unwavering support and popularity throughout the city of dallas just because a tiny handful of people were wearing seahawks jerseys at AT&T Stadium in a crowd full of cowboys fans, when the seahawks weren't even playing them that day.
 
Last edited:
@cottagecheesefan

Not Flynn, I was smoking strong chit that night.

Tulsi or Byron.


The Biblical stuff still holds. Chapter 11.

Nice. Byron is my first choice, as I think he will bring black males into the fold like never before. Tulsi is my next choice, almost as equal, as will bring independents, especially women over to the coalition.

I think both are able to carry the MAGA torch post this election as well.
 
  • Love
Reactions: N13
Yeah, it's not a lie because you were the only person dumb enough to take that statement literally.


How about you highlight the portion of the article(s) that gave you this impression. I think the room is generally curious as to how anyone could have such poor reading comprehension.

so where is this said claim you speak of, and just who is making this claim? are they real world people with a name and face to attach to their claim? post this claim pls!

oh yeah, it has to say ONLY white people in such claim. keyword "only". you're the one making this claim, and i'm sure it will be little effort for you to back it up. if that's really what people are saying of course.

and remember: "not many black people showed up" ≠ "only white people showed up"

i mean sure, there were one or two black people in a crowd full of white people over at a black church. but that's like trying to make the deceiving impression on people that the seattle seahawks have unwavering support and popularity throughout the city of dallas just because a tiny handful of people were wearing seahawks jerseys at AT&T Stadium in a crowd full of cowboys fans, when the seahawks weren't even playing them that day.
If you two weren't lazy hacks, you could go back and see what I originally was responding to. I understand that may be a complicated process for you, so I've quoted it below. I look forward to you trying to change the subject or disappear entirely.

 
If you two weren't lazy hacks, you could go back and see what I originally was responding to. I understand that may be a complicated process for you, so I've quoted it below. I look forward to you trying to change the subject or disappear entirely.

fair enough. was just making sure you weren't talking out of your ass.

you might be better off trying to make your point to the original author of the tweet and tell him that there was a black person or two in that crowd full of white people. it will completely destroy the narrative.
 
He seems to pull a Mitch McConnell every rally now.
There is a reason his handlers kept him away from the GOP debates. Christie would have humiliated him while having to listen to Trump retorting with fat jokes.


Fun fact...

Donald Trump hasn't debated ANYONE since he got worked by Biden in their debate, four YEARS ago.
 
If you two weren't lazy hacks, you could go back and see what I originally was responding to. I understand that may be a complicated process for you, so I've quoted it below. I look forward to you trying to change the subject or disappear entirely.

I did. At no point did I notice any poster here claim that literally there wasn't a single black person present.

Could you direct us to the post that had you so confused? Because it seems like you're the only one dumb enough to take this literally.
 
fair enough. was just making sure you weren't talking out of your ass.

you might be better off trying to make your point to the original author of the tweet and tell him that there was a black person or two in that crowd full of white people. it will completely destroy the narrative.
I don't really care enough to debate the tweet's author. Just another lame attempt to distort truth and lie to own the chuds. As far as your second sentence, I'm going to chalk it up to you being unable to count above 2.

1718884404764.png

1718884473847.png

I did. At no point did I notice any poster here claim that literally there wasn't a single black person present.

Could you direct us to the post that had you so confused? Because it seems like you're the only one dumb enough to take this literally.
At no point did I say a poster said that. This is where you start to lie again to save face for trying to die on this insignificant hill. I had responded to a mod who added a tweet that made the claim. I re-quoted it in my previous post for you, yet you still want to play this game. Go back and read the exchange slowly, bud.
 
This is where you start to lie again to save face for trying to die on this insignificant hill.

I don't think making fun of you for being the only person to take the comments "there were no black people there," in the most literal sense, is an insignificant hill.

I think there is a genuine political good being done in pointing out just how dumb trump supporters are. Further, I think there is value in discussing just how desperate some of his supporters, like yourself, are to cover up for his lies.

I mean, think about the actual issue being discussed. This all started with media pointing out that the trump campaigns claim that 8,000 people showed up at a black church to see donny, was clearly a lie. A lie in regards to both the number of people that actually showed up (look like about 200 tops to me, which is pretty fucking bad), and a lie in regards to the suggestion that this was a mostly black crowd. In fact, I haven't heard a reporter who found a single member of that church actual congregation in attendance. Looks like they had to bus just about everybody.

And we can all see that. There's literal video of the crowd sitting there while trump is talking. And there is no way it's anywhere near 8,000 people.

But even a lie that obvious, is one you have to fly in here and desperately defend. You just can't let daddy have any criticism. And you decided to go about that, by calling everyone liars because you spotted a handful of black people in pictures.


How about this, we drop this topic. We get right back to the meet and potatoes of this issue. And it's a really easy and direct one. And it's this question: Did they lie about the attendance numbers at this trump speech? Yes or no?

Do you have the integrity to answer that one little question? Or do we need to continue with full on deflection a bit longer?
 
Back
Top