- Joined
- Jan 24, 2016
- Messages
- 6,952
- Reaction score
- 7,170
This is getting weird my dude.
That's a 4chan racist meme. @cottagecheesefan is straight up dog whistling his white nationalist stance
This is getting weird my dude.
Lawyers are weighing in on Elon 1 million dollar contest and in 52.USC.10307 stature that rewarding people people just to register is against the law. They say in the law inducing people via some form to register in a swing state means by definition is against the law as posted in 52.USC.10307. It due to the nature of targeting people specifically in swing state breaks the law based on the legal definition according to lawyers. I am not a lawyer but so many have dug into this a found huge problems. Nevermind Elon claiming he would not trust software when talking about voting machines yet he wants people to trust his autonomous software in his cars? Look in the mirror much Elon?
Everyone wants fuxk link A-hole I gave the actual link to where F'ing Elon actually breaking the law and you posts this sh$t? Go F yourself and go back into your moms basement oh take off your McDonalds uniform. Oh you don't have many posts since 2004 where you activated again for Trump election by your Russian bosses lol?
Sorry my teleprompter isn't working so I don't know what to respond to this.
Video explaining the case.
DEC brings back memories of my university days.Slack was really the first distro at the time came out of Berkley that seemed to be a huge Unix hub at the time. You could download Slackwear if you had a decent network connection or order on CD. It could fit on one CD around 500 meg. Had pretty much all you need to setup as a server it even had a desktop manager. Red Hat came out shortly after with a much better graphical interface out of North Carolina. But Berkley BSD was king in the 80's early 90's and almost everything was developed off of that except for big IBM boxes and some crazy AI machines yep back then.
"
The Berkeley Software Distribution or Berkeley Standard Distribution[1] (BSD) is a discontinued operating system based on Research Unix, developed and distributed by the Computer Systems Research Group (CSRG) at the University of California, Berkeley. Since the original has become obsolete, the term "BSD" is commonly used for its open-source descendants, including FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, and DragonFly BSD.
BSD was initially called Berkeley Unix because it was based on the source code of the original Unix developed at Bell Labs. In the 1980s, BSD was widely adopted by workstation vendors in the form of proprietary Unix variants such as DEC Ultrix and Sun Microsystems SunOS due to its permissive licensing and familiarity to many technology company founders and engineers. These proprietary BSD derivatives were largely superseded in the 1990s by UNIX SVR4 and OSF/1.
Later releases of BSD provided the basis for several open-source operating systems including FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, DragonFly BSD, Darwin and TrueOS. These, in turn, have been used by proprietary operating systems, including Apple's macOS and iOS, which derived from them[2] and Microsoft Windows (since at least 2000 and XP), which used (at least) part of its TCP/IP code, which was legal.[3][better source needed] Code from FreeBSD was also used to create the operating systems for the PlayStation 5,[4] PlayStation 4,[5] PlayStation 3,[6] PlayStation Vita,[7] and Nintendo Switch.[8][9]
Mach Kernel was the bases for the most amazing OS at the time BeOS . It could run on anything pretty much and had the best UI and programming libraries. It was multithreaded and multitasked but left hanging without a company to implement it.
"
![]()
Lessons from BeOS: optimizing software adoption
Dive into the story of BeOS, an advanced OS that didn't catch on, and learn valuable lessons on optimizing software adoption for modern tech leaders.testdouble.com
Imagine you’ve worked for years to try to create a better way to write software, and now you’ve finally succeeded. But nobody wants to use it. What do you do next?
This is a question I’ve thought about a lot over the past few years. I’ve tried using a variety of programming languages and frameworks that purport to make software development better—and I think they do! But most of them haven’t caught on, usually resulting in them struggling to be maintained. Seeing this play out time and time again, I have to ask myself: Is it worth it to try to make software better? Or is my desire for software to be better a desire that will inevitably leave me disappointed?
This question came to mind again as I’ve been setting up a vintage Macintosh to run BeOS, an operating system developed in the 1990s. I’ve really been getting into vintage Macintoshes lately. I used Macs as a kid, but now I can do things I wasn’t able to afford as a kid, like buy 1995’s most powerful Macintosh to run "
Ran on PC's, Macs, servers , Digital Equipment Alphas an such.
Pretty hilarious considering most Conservatives previous views on electric cars