Economy Trump Election Effects on Immigration

CorninginChristianburg

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Apr 18, 2019
Messages
2,551
Reaction score
1,846
I have some thoughts on the immigration discussion and I wanted to just shout them into the void.

I have a very unique perspective on this issue. I worked at an immigration law firm and in public criminal defense. I voted for Kamala, but do not consider myself a liberal. I'm extremely involved in the immigrant community of my native origin, I know many people who will be personally affected by changes to immigration policy.

1. Democrats are fearmongering/overreacting: there's been a line that has been floated in the past few days since the election result was clear that Trump will drive up mass deportations that will send half the affordable workforce away, prices will skyrocket, Americans will suffer, etc. I don't think this is realistic. I'll be the first to admit that I don't follow Trump's rallies and his speeches very closely. But my understanding of his policy position was that he wants to deport undocumented persons convicted of crimes en masse, at least that this would be his primary focus.

I have represented a lot of people without papers, especially in the criminal defense work. I do not think that undocumented persons are more likely than anyone else in the same socioeconomic groups to commit crimes, I want to be clear on that. In fact, breaking the numbers down with my friends in the industry, I think they may be slightly less likely to do so. However, of those that do commit crimes...we're not talking about your highly industrious citizenry. There is a subset of the undocumented class that works very hard, is very economically productive, and is vital to our workforce. There is a subset of undocumented people who, usually come with lofty goals of supporting their family abroad but either run into issues with substances or issues with assimilating and run with the wrong crowd. There isn't a whole lot of overlap with these subsets. Many in the latter subset struggle to maintain employment, or they are relatively low productivity workers when they are employed. On the other hand, the appear repeatedly in the system, and end up costing the state a non-trivial amount of resources.

There are a lot of statewide laws preventing local LEO from working with ICE, ICE's resources are stretched thin and to be clear, even under Trump 45 they were stretched thin. There will have to be target prioritization, whether Trump likes it or not. Which is to say, even if Trump wanted to deport every illegal immigrant regardless of criminality, which I'm not convinced he does, he will have to focus on deporting only those with records. So I'm really not worried about these "mass deportation waves" having a tremendous economic impact. I think the large underbelly of the economy, the hardworking undocumented worker and his family, will likely go untouched, if for no other reason as a matter of necessity.

2. Trump presidency will be bad for immigration: I am still very concerned about immigration policy under Trump 47. A lot of lip service has been given to wanted legal immigration in the campaign trail. However, the track record shows otherwise. I worked in immigration (not as an attorney) during 45 and although I'm far from a subject matter expert, I know people who are. 45 was a very rough time to be a legal immigrant, particularly in 2019-2020. Especially when it comes to F1, H1B, O1, EB1A, Green Card approvals, these are areas that I think are of tremendous importance to the country's economic prowess and competitiveness.

I do not imagine that they will get better under Trump. I think at the very best case, dream scenario, is that they do not get worse under Trump, than under Biden. And from people in the field, I know they strongly anticipate that it will get worse. These immigrants are the backbone of our country and our economy, and they have tremendous potential to be excellent American citizens. Trump gave a lot of lip service to support for legal immigration. I hope that is reflected in USCIS' policies moving forward.

I've spoken with many legal immigrants. And they are concerned by the actions of undisciplined/unruly undocumented immigrants. I think something that the left often misses is that the victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants...they're not your wealthy white people. They are usually other poor white, poor hispanic, or poor black people. Thus, they have a more nuanced approach to these issues than "he says he will deport people so I will rage!" If Trump's immigration policy can have the precision to remove only those immigrants who have a record of being a blight on their communities, I think it could end up being very popular and even successful. But if the best and the brightest, engineers, doctors, lawyers, researchers in our universities have to be turned away, perhaps due to some nativist bias. I think that will have very bad downstream effects for American competitiveness in the global economy moving forward.
 
This was a good post. I think the lack of responses means most here didn't like what you had to say.
 
I have some thoughts on the immigration discussion and I wanted to just shout them into the void.

I have a very unique perspective on this issue. I worked at an immigration law firm and in public criminal defense. I voted for Kamala, but do not consider myself a liberal. I'm extremely involved in the immigrant community of my native origin, I know many people who will be personally affected by changes to immigration policy.

1. Democrats are fearmongering/overreacting: there's been a line that has been floated in the past few days since the election result was clear that Trump will drive up mass deportations that will send half the affordable workforce away, prices will skyrocket, Americans will suffer, etc. I don't think this is realistic. I'll be the first to admit that I don't follow Trump's rallies and his speeches very closely. But my understanding of his policy position was that he wants to deport undocumented persons convicted of crimes en masse, at least that this would be his primary focus.

I have represented a lot of people without papers, especially in the criminal defense work. I do not think that undocumented persons are more likely than anyone else in the same socioeconomic groups to commit crimes, I want to be clear on that. In fact, breaking the numbers down with my friends in the industry, I think they may be slightly less likely to do so. However, of those that do commit crimes...we're not talking about your highly industrious citizenry. There is a subset of the undocumented class that works very hard, is very economically productive, and is vital to our workforce. There is a subset of undocumented people who, usually come with lofty goals of supporting their family abroad but either run into issues with substances or issues with assimilating and run with the wrong crowd. There isn't a whole lot of overlap with these subsets. Many in the latter subset struggle to maintain employment, or they are relatively low productivity workers when they are employed. On the other hand, the appear repeatedly in the system, and end up costing the state a non-trivial amount of resources.

There are a lot of statewide laws preventing local LEO from working with ICE, ICE's resources are stretched thin and to be clear, even under Trump 45 they were stretched thin. There will have to be target prioritization, whether Trump likes it or not. Which is to say, even if Trump wanted to deport every illegal immigrant regardless of criminality, which I'm not convinced he does, he will have to focus on deporting only those with records. So I'm really not worried about these "mass deportation waves" having a tremendous economic impact. I think the large underbelly of the economy, the hardworking undocumented worker and his family, will likely go untouched, if for no other reason as a matter of necessity.

2. Trump presidency will be bad for immigration: I am still very concerned about immigration policy under Trump 47. A lot of lip service has been given to wanted legal immigration in the campaign trail. However, the track record shows otherwise. I worked in immigration (not as an attorney) during 45 and although I'm far from a subject matter expert, I know people who are. 45 was a very rough time to be a legal immigrant, particularly in 2019-2020. Especially when it comes to F1, H1B, O1, EB1A, Green Card approvals, these are areas that I think are of tremendous importance to the country's economic prowess and competitiveness.

I do not imagine that they will get better under Trump. I think at the very best case, dream scenario, is that they do not get worse under Trump, than under Biden. And from people in the field, I know they strongly anticipate that it will get worse. These immigrants are the backbone of our country and our economy, and they have tremendous potential to be excellent American citizens. Trump gave a lot of lip service to support for legal immigration. I hope that is reflected in USCIS' policies moving forward.

I've spoken with many legal immigrants. And they are concerned by the actions of undisciplined/unruly undocumented immigrants. I think something that the left often misses is that the victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants...they're not your wealthy white people. They are usually other poor white, poor hispanic, or poor black people. Thus, they have a more nuanced approach to these issues than "he says he will deport people so I will rage!" If Trump's immigration policy can have the precision to remove only those immigrants who have a record of being a blight on their communities, I think it could end up being very popular and even successful. But if the best and the brightest, engineers, doctors, lawyers, researchers in our universities have to be turned away, perhaps due to some nativist bias. I think that will have very bad downstream effects for American competitiveness in the global economy moving forward.

Nativism and identitarianism are both silly.

It's never been the case that countries shut up shop and exist outside of each other's pockets - it's a delusional modern fantasy.

That said, there are limits to everything, including migration, and we must be on, near, or possibly beyond those limits. I'm interested to see how it gets dealt with. Will be watching with interest.
 
I've read that Florida immigration policy caused a lot of lost revenue from Orange famers and distributors. There would be a lot of economic issues with a serious crackdown mostly from right leaning industries

More here
 
I have a bad feeling my govt is not ready for all these illegals flooding to the Canadian border.
 
But if the best and the brightest, engineers, doctors, lawyers, researchers in our universities have to be turned away, perhaps due to some nativist bias. I think that will have very bad downstream effects for American competitiveness in the global economy moving forward.
This also asks for a crystal ball that doesn't exist. There's no way to know what the child of an immigrant is going to be, just as with native born Americans.
 
I've spoken with many legal immigrants. And they are concerned by the actions of undisciplined/unruly undocumented immigrants. I think something that the left often misses is that the victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants...they're not your wealthy white people. They are usually other poor white, poor hispanic, or poor black people. Thus, they have a more nuanced approach to these issues than "he says he will deport people so I will rage!" If Trump's immigration policy can have the precision to remove only those immigrants who have a record of being a blight on their communities, I think it could end up being very popular and even successful. But if the best and the brightest, engineers, doctors, lawyers, researchers in our universities have to be turned away, perhaps due to some nativist bias. I think that will have very bad downstream effects for American competitiveness in the global economy moving forward.
well said
This also asks for a crystal ball that doesn't exist. There's no way to know what the child of an immigrant is going to be, just as with native born Americans.
nobody can precog what a child is going to be, that's a non issue
we're talking about what they are NOW and what they have to offer NOW
 
nobody can precog what a child is going to be, that's a non issue
we're talking about what they are NOW and what they have to offer NOW
How do you determine what an adult is going to offer society in 10 or 20 years? It's the same impossible ask. That's most of the point of immigration, it's a long term proposition, not what do you offer here and now to the country.
 
I heard the caravan of immigrants coming broke up after Trump won the election.

We need a far more robust and streamlined process. We also need a guest worker program for agriculture where taxes are levied that go to American Citizens Social Security. It could be a win all the way around.
 
How do you determine what an adult is going to offer society in 10 or 20 years? It's the same impossible ask. That's most of the point of immigration, it's a long term proposition, not what do you offer here and now to the country.
you determine what an immigrant offers by what they offer with their current skillset
you don't plan on their kids being exceptional
that's such a ridiculous red herring of an argument
 
This also asks for a crystal ball that doesn't exist. There's no way to know what the child of an immigrant is going to be, just as with native born Americans.
you determine what an immigrant offers by what they offer with their current skillset
you don't plan on their kids being exceptional
that's such a ridiculous red herring of an argument
This guy answered your question.

People getting F1, O1, EB1A, H1B, they are known quantities, they are bringing tangible gifts that we are well aware of. I guess I should break it down -

F1 visa - student visa
O1/EB1 visa - extraordinary ability
H1B visa - skilled worker visa
 
Trump seems to be more bark than bite when it comes to immigration. Actual results regarding deportations, border crossings, etc. seemed to be about average for any other president Democrat or Republican during his first term. I foresee little actually being done by him regarding immigration, but the passion he brings to the matter will make people overlook that and people will find any little victory to show he is doing more than others.
 
Trump seems to be more bark than bite when it comes to immigration. Actual results regarding deportations, border crossings, etc. seemed to be about average for any other president Democrat or Republican during his first term. I foresee little actually being done by him regarding immigration, but the passion he brings to the matter will make people overlook that and people will find any little victory to show he is doing more than others.
unlike then, he has all the infinity stones (houses senate and presidency) and what resembles a popular vote after the disastrous biden term
if there was ever a time for it.. it's now
 
Trump seems to be more bark than bite when it comes to immigration. Actual results regarding deportations, border crossings, etc. seemed to be about average for any other president Democrat or Republican during his first term. I foresee little actually being done by him regarding immigration, but the passion he brings to the matter will make people overlook that and people will find any little victory to show he is doing more than others.
For sure.

Can't help but take away the idea the immigration issue is less about actually doing something, and more using the rhetoric around it to wind up people on both sides of the argument for political gain.
 
you determine what an immigrant offers by what they offer with their current skillset
you don't plan on their kids being exceptional
that's such a ridiculous red herring of an argument
So how are you going to assess aptitude for construction, agricultural, and hospitality/service jobs?

I'm getting at two things here:
1. Most of the opposition from the right to immigration isn't driven by economics, it's prejudice. We can talk about how we're going to increase or expedite legal immigration but the GOP has consistently advocated for the opposite.
2. You're advocating for a lot of government economic planning that has largely been ineffective. It doesn't mean it can't be improved, but probably better to let the labor market sort itself out as much as possible (which it does, illegal immigration tends to drop during economic downturns).
People getting F1, O1, EB1A, H1B, they are known quantities, they are bringing tangible gifts that we are well aware of. I guess I should break it down -

F1 visa - student visa
O1/EB1 visa - extraordinary ability
H1B visa - skilled worker visa
See above. You're missing most of the immigration needs for America.
 
unlike then, he has all the infinity stones (houses senate and presidency) and what resembles a popular vote after the disastrous biden term
if there was ever a time for it.. it's now
I think the thing is Trump seems all about over-promising and under-performing, but being able to appear like he succeeded. If anything I think our immigration issues mainly stem from logistical issues and Trump can't really do any better than those who have tried before. Then there is the fact of why would Republicans get rid of the topic that is very effective in winning them elections.
 
Back
Top