Social Trump blast AG Bondi in now deleted social media post(Fox News)

I’m surprised he has stayed patient with her as long as he has.

She botched the Epstein thing. Unforgivably. While I don’t in the slightest bit buy the democrats newfound interest in it and don’t grant them the high ground on any issue, least of all that..and it has no legs. It was still an unforced error for no reason whatsoever.

Especially that whole show where she had all those influencers come to DC before handing them what she knew was useless trash.

No scalps. She’s yammering about “hate speech” now.

She better start making moves or she’s gonna get canned

That was the party line at the time. Vance was in Theo Von saying they should be released too


If anyone gets let go for being shit at their job before Kash Patel I'm gonna be suspicious. That guy seems borderline retarded to me.
 
Clinton did not deserve to be impeached, Trump did. Yes the Republicans made it partisan.
It's always partisan. You're being partisan with it right now.
 
That was the party line at the time. Vance was in Theo Von saying they should be released too


If anyone gets let go for being shit at their job before Kash Patel I'm gonna be suspicious. That guy seems borderline retarded to me.


Disagree, they simply must keep him on for the entertainment value alone. I mean let's face it, whoever replaces him isn't going to be competent or even selected on those grounds, but whoever the replacement might be, there is little-no chance they will provide us with an endless stream of pictures showing, to those of us who had always wondered, exactly what an over-stimulated squirrel in a state of great perplexity might look like.

And you know those stories from the UK about cocaine hoards being hidden in parks, where foraging squirrels would find, then consume part of the hoard, and thereafter there would be a minor blight on the park in question as a series of over-aggressive squirrels worked through the effects of cocaine hydrolysis, terrifying small dogs and children? Again, how would we know exactly what they looked like, absent Patel's 'now I'm really angry and I'm going to cow you with my fierceness' display opposite Raskin the other day?
 
Disagree, they simply must keep him on for the entertainment value alone. I mean let's face it, whoever replaces him isn't going to be competent or even selected on those grounds, but whoever the replacement might be, there is little-no chance they will provide us with an endless stream of pictures showing, to those of us who had always wondered, exactly what an over-stimulated squirrel in a state of great perplexity might look like.

And you know those stories from the UK about cocaine hoards being hidden in parks, where foraging squirrels would find, then consume part of the hoard, and thereafter there would be a minor blight on the park in question as a series of over-aggressive squirrels worked through the effects of cocaine hydrolysis, terrifying small dogs and children? Again, how would we know exactly what they looked like, absent Patel's 'now I'm really angry and I'm going to cow you with my fierceness' display opposite Raskin the other day?

I must agree that he is the most entertaining politician I've ever seen.

It also does go to show that if he can be in charge of the FBI then anything truly is possible so I suppose that's inspirational in a way. I'll be captain of the England football team yet.
 
I must agree that he is the most entertaining politician I've ever seen.

It also does go to show that if he can be in charge of the FBI then anything truly is possible so I suppose that's inspirational in a way. I'll be captain of the England football team yet.

exactly, you get it. even whilst disowning DEI, they thoroughly own it.
 
It's always partisan. You're being partisan with it right now.

You are just projecting. Clinton was the victim of a witch hunt, that is factual not partisan. Clinton was asked about a personal private matter, should never have been asked.
 
Trump has done thousands of things worse than anything Clinton did.

That doesn't mean Clinton wasn't guilty.
I think the problem is that if Clinton deserved to be impeached once, then Trump deserves to be impeached at least a hundred times.

So people are complaining about the perceived lack of proportionality. But you're right that Clinton was obviously guilty.
 
You are just projecting. Clinton was the victim of a witch hunt, that is factual not partisan.
Sure, but it's also factual that he broke the law, and was cleared on partisan grounds. Trump was also the victim of a witch hunt. He had the Dems up his ass everyday over Russia, and when that fell apart, they impeached him over a phone call suggesting an investigation be opened up against Biden(the horror!). His second impeachment was over him using the word "fight" and trying to make it some direction to attack the Capitol, even though he very clearly said to march peaceful. In both instances, it was the extremely partisan opposition bringing these flimsy charges, and they failed on both attempts...on partisan grounds.

Just face it. You're not exactly an objective observer here.
 
His second impeachment was over him using the word "fight" and trying to make it some direction to attack the Capitol, even though he very clearly said to march peaceful. In both instances, it was the extremely partisan opposition bringing these flimsy charges, and they failed on both attempts...on partisan grounds.

You forgot the part where he lied to the American people for weeks about the election being stolen and then told them they needed to go to the Capitol building and fight like hell or else they wouldn't have a country anymore.

Minor details, huh?

"You're not exactly an objective observer here."

<eyerollstanley>
 
Back
Top