- Joined
- Aug 22, 2018
- Messages
- 10,196
- Reaction score
- 14,068
So no wonder people are trying to diminish his part in this whole, err, movement, but his influence is undeniable.yikes
The problem isn't that you don't understand gender(which you don't). The problem isn't even that you don't want to understand it(no one can force you to learn).did I say that? Hes the pioneer in the gender construct ideology and gender theory.
Transgenderism itself is real disorder, obviously
He doesn't have any credentials. That's the point. I'm not giving "one of the religious right's most influential young voices any fucking clicks, get it? I'm not watching the fucking video and adding to his revenue stream, understand? If you have relevant empirical data to support your stance, post it like @EndlessCritic. Talk is cheap.So you moved from attacking his character to attacking his credentials. Maybe try calling him ugly next?
lol another poster and I have already debunked your bizarre claims with sources.The problem isn't that you don't understand gender(which you don't). The problem isn't even that you don't want to understand it(no one can force you to learn).
The problem is that you think you understand it and spread misinformation based on that flawed understanding.
I will say that naming yourself after la philosopher while at the same time having no intellectual curiosity or critical thinking skills is a bold choice.
Considering sexual orientation and gender identity is at least in part genetic, I would guess higher than average? What there is however no substantial evidence for is social or parental influence, which I'm sure is what you were trying to suggest.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...odel-Noella-McMaher-10-set-make-millions.html
2 trans parents raise a 'theybie' who turns out trans, what are the odds?
This is a profoundly dishonest post.This is a profoundly dishonest post.
John Money coined the term gender identity, but transgender people have existed for as long as people have existed. Decades before Money coined the term, the phenomenon of gender dysphoria and sex-change were studied.
John Money was also an quack whose experiments were unethical and immoral. The Reimer case is shocking and criminal IMO. It also, at its core, has nothing to do with transgender people. The child in question was not transgender.
Transphobes love to pretend that the work of John Money is what spawned the ideology of today, when in fact it's only one(very dark) chapter in the evolution of the understanding of gender.
I love how you all act like gender is some hard concept for conservatives to understand. It's not. It's just really boring and it baffles us that not only do you think it's so great but you use the idea so inconsistently. It's a convoluted mess. When someone critical asks you to define the word woman you can't even do that.The problem isn't that you don't understand gender(which you don't). The problem isn't even that you don't want to understand it(no one can force you to learn).
The problem is that you think you understand it and spread misinformation based on that flawed understanding.
I will say that naming yourself after la philosopher while at the same time having no intellectual curiosity or critical thinking skills is a bold choice.
Considering sexual orientation and gender identity is at least in part genetic, I would guess higher than average? What there is however no substantial evidence for is social or parental influence, which I'm sure is what you were trying to suggest.
literally every leftist proposal to a solution is untestedThere is absolutely no evidence gender identity is in any way genetic. Where are you pulling that nonsense from that it is?
You'd have to be an extremely low IQ individual to believe parental influence doesn't play a part in gender identity.
When you have 2 parents who can't even decide what gender they want to be what chance does the kid have?
He doesn't have any credentials. That's the point. I'm not giving "one of the religious right's most influential young voices any fucking clicks, get it? I'm not watching the fucking video and adding to his revenue stream, understand? If you have relevant empirical data to support your stance, post it like @EndlessCritic. Talk is cheap.
So yeah, again, he's a youtube rando with no relevant credentials that we know of. Thanks for playing, please try again.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...odel-Noella-McMaher-10-set-make-millions.html
2 trans parents raise a 'theybie' who turns out trans, what are the odds?
Pure nonsense. I guess I'm just misremembering when my child was forced to wear a mask at school and became addicted to it to where I would pick her up from the playground and she would still be wearing it outside?100% agree. All the mewling and venting of spleens about transgender people is clear effort to pick out specific anecdotes and blow them up in social media until they're in a frenzy of manufactured outrage, then try to paint the entire concept with the same brush and call it a leftist conspiracy. It's a gross tactic but it works and it's a great way to whip up the base without having any policies that the people in general would support without the need for all that.
It's exactly the same thing with CRT, voter ID, masks, vaccines, and so on and so on. Such and such a very specific situation (real or made up, they don't care)is such an absolute outrage so everything remotely related to it is for sure also bad, particularly if there are Democrats who support any aspect of it. It's sad that it works time and time again, but there it is.
If he is right, that information is documented somewhere. Go get it and let me see. Until then your description of what he said isn't worth a fuck any more than that video. I don't give clicks to "religious right" grifters so you can fuck off if you don't like it. If what he said has any validity he'll have told you in the video where he got his information and you can go get it for me if you want to try to prove what he said is true. Until then, it's no different than "You shall not replace us".You are a rando so by your logic I shouldn't give anything you say the time of day.
If you were good faith here you would have watched the video and seen that Walsh called out your source for using a completely bogus statistic on the number of intersex people. Instead of counting only real intersex people it came up with a competely dishonest criteria to inflate the numbers. They created their own criteria for the ideal man and woman and anything that deviated from it went into their lie on how many intersex people there are.
What kind of credentials do you need to find lies? Anyway since you won't look at my links I'll stop looking at the dumb shit you link.