- Joined
- Jul 21, 2014
- Messages
- 19,152
- Reaction score
- 71,507
If I was a progressive I'd want a designer baby, the "obama's son" please.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-38328097
TLDR They say it's to cure diseases for couples who otherwise wouldn't be able to have children or something and the baby actually has DNA from its two mothers instead of just the surrogate mother. Slippery slope sometimes isn't a fallacy, "designer babies".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-38328097
A technique using a donor egg as well as the mother's egg and father's sperm has been developed.
The resulting child has a tiny amount of their DNA from the donor, but the procedure is legal, ethical and scientifically ready.
Babies made from two women and one man have been approved by the UK's fertility regulator.
The UK will not be the first country in the world to have children born through the three-person technique.
A Jordanian couple and doctors in New York performed the procedure in Mexico and the resulting baby is understood to be healthy.
The decision is not universally welcome.
Dr David King, from the campaign group Human Genetics Alert, said: "This decision opens the door to the world of genetically-modified designer babies.
"Already, bioethicists have started to argue that allowing mitochondrial replacement means that there is no logical basis for resisting GM babies, which is exactly how slippery slopes work."
TLDR They say it's to cure diseases for couples who otherwise wouldn't be able to have children or something and the baby actually has DNA from its two mothers instead of just the surrogate mother. Slippery slope sometimes isn't a fallacy, "designer babies".